DoD's $10.5M IBCT VMF, FTK contract awarded to QBS INC in 2007, completed in 2009
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,546,623 ($10.5M)
Contractor: QBS Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-07-26
End Date: 2009-04-30
Contract Duration: 644 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: IBCT VMF, FTK
Place of Performance
Location: FORT KNOX, HARDIN County, KENTUCKY, 40121
State: Kentucky Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.5 million to QBS INC for work described as: IBCT VMF, FTK Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.5M for construction services. 2. Awarded to QBS INC by the Department of the Army. 3. Utilized Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources. 4. Contract duration was 644 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $10.5M for construction services appears reasonable for the period of performance (2007-2009). Benchmarking against similar projects from that era would provide a more precise assessment of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources, indicating a competitive process. However, the specific reason for excluding other sources needs further investigation to ensure optimal price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests efforts to secure fair pricing, but the exclusion of sources warrants scrutiny to confirm taxpayer value.
Public Impact
Construction projects can impact local economies through job creation and material sourcing. Military construction projects are vital for operational readiness and troop support. Transparency in contracting ensures public trust and efficient use of taxpayer funds.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Reason for exclusion of sources in competition needs clarification.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes assessing effectiveness difficult.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process.
- Contract completed within its duration.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on government infrastructure needs and economic conditions. Benchmarks for similar DoD construction projects from 2007-2009 would be relevant.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight of this contract would have involved the Department of the Army ensuring compliance with contract terms and quality standards. Post-award reviews or audits would provide insights into accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for reduced competition due to source exclusion.
- Lack of detailed performance data hinders effectiveness assessment.
- Need for benchmarking against similar projects from the same era.
- Unclear small business participation.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ky, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.5 million to QBS INC. IBCT VMF, FTK
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is QBS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-07-26. End: 2009-04-30.
What was the specific justification for excluding sources in the 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' method, and did this impact the final price?
The justification for excluding sources in this contracting method is crucial. If the exclusion was not well-founded or limited competition unnecessarily, it could lead to higher prices than a truly open competition. Understanding the rationale behind the exclusion is key to assessing whether the government secured the best possible value and if taxpayer funds were used efficiently.
How did the final cost of $10.5M compare to the initial bid or estimated cost for this construction project?
Comparing the final cost to the initial bid or estimated cost is essential for evaluating financial performance. Significant deviations could indicate issues with initial estimations, scope creep, or unforeseen challenges during execution. A detailed cost breakdown and variance analysis would reveal the efficiency of project management and adherence to budget.
What were the key performance indicators for this contract, and were they met by QBS INC?
Assessing the contractor's performance against key metrics is vital for understanding contract effectiveness. Without specific performance indicators (e.g., quality of work, adherence to schedule, safety compliance), it's difficult to determine if QBS INC successfully delivered the required construction services. Post-completion reviews or client feedback would offer insights into the project's success.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912QR04R0006
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 1548 LINDEN AVE S, ALLIANCE, OH, 06
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,546,623
Exercised Options: $10,546,623
Current Obligation: $10,546,623
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912QR04D0016
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-07-26
Current End Date: 2009-04-30
Potential End Date: 2009-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-06-04
More Contracts from QBS Inc
- Volar Barracks Renovation — $21.2M (Department of Defense)
- Construction for the Fire Station, Located AT Youngstown AIR Reserve Base, OH — $15.7M (Department of Defense)
- Design/Build Construction of the Full Facility Restoration of the J Diamond Usarc — $14.9M (Department of Defense)
- Base BID for Project NO Zrvl092008 Zanesville Building 1 Renovation — $9.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)