DoD's $21.2M Volar Barracks Renovation: Full & Open Competition, Firm Fixed Price Contract Awarded
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,218,524 ($21.2M)
Contractor: QBS Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-09-30
End Date: 2012-01-30
Contract Duration: 852 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: VOLAR BARRACKS RENOVATION
Place of Performance
Location: FORT CAMPBELL, CHRISTIAN County, KENTUCKY, 42223
State: Kentucky Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.2 million to QBS INC for work described as: VOLAR BARRACKS RENOVATION Key points: 1. Spending of $21.2M on barracks renovation. 2. Contract awarded by Department of the Army. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests cost certainty. 4. Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $21.2M for barracks renovation appears within a reasonable range for a project of this scope. However, without specific details on the scope of work and location, a precise benchmark is difficult. The firm fixed price structure aims to control costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' indicates a limited competition, which may not yield the best possible pricing. This approach could restrict the pool of eligible bidders and potentially lead to higher costs than a truly open competition.
Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for the barracks renovation. A more open bidding process could have driven down prices.
Public Impact
Military personnel housing quality improvement. Potential impact on soldier morale and readiness. Economic activity in Kentucky through construction.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition may increase costs.
- Project duration of 852 days is substantial.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type.
- Awarded by Department of the Army.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant area of government spending. Benchmarks for similar renovation projects vary widely based on location, scope, and specific building types.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate whether small businesses participated in or benefited from this contract. Further analysis would be needed to assess small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight of this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Army contracting office. The firm fixed price nature provides some cost accountability, but performance and quality oversight remain crucial.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may result in higher costs.
- Lack of detail on scope of work hinders value assessment.
- Potential for cost overruns despite FFP contract.
- Long project duration of 852 days.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ky, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.2 million to QBS INC. VOLAR BARRACKS RENOVATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is QBS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-09-30. End: 2012-01-30.
What was the specific scope of work for the Volar Barracks renovation, and how does the $21.2M cost compare to similar projects with comparable scope and location?
The specific scope of work for the Volar Barracks renovation is not detailed in the provided data. To accurately assess value, this information is critical. Comparing the $21.2M cost to similar projects requires detailed project specifications, square footage, types of upgrades (e.g., structural, HVAC, electrical, cosmetic), and the specific geographic location to account for regional cost variations.
What were the reasons for excluding other sources in the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' method, and did this exclusion lead to a higher price than anticipated?
The reasons for excluding other sources are not specified, but typically involve justifications like specific technical requirements, urgent needs, or prior experience. This limited competition structure inherently carries a risk of reduced price competition, potentially leading to a higher final price compared to a broader, unrestricted solicitation. An analysis of the bids received versus the government's estimate would reveal if the price was indeed higher.
How effectively did the firm fixed price contract type ensure cost control and prevent cost overruns during the 852-day project duration?
The firm fixed price contract type is designed to provide cost certainty by shifting most of the risk to the contractor. However, its effectiveness in preventing cost overruns depends heavily on the initial bid accuracy, the contractor's management, and the clarity of the contract's scope. Unexpected issues or scope creep, even with an FFP contract, can still lead to change orders and increased costs, requiring diligent oversight.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912QR08R0040
Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1548 LINDEN AVE S, ALLIANCE, OH, 44601
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,218,524
Exercised Options: $21,218,524
Current Obligation: $21,218,524
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912QR09D0018
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-09-30
Current End Date: 2012-01-30
Potential End Date: 2012-01-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-04-29
More Contracts from QBS Inc
- Construction for the Fire Station, Located AT Youngstown AIR Reserve Base, OH — $15.7M (Department of Defense)
- Design/Build Construction of the Full Facility Restoration of the J Diamond Usarc — $14.9M (Department of Defense)
- Ibct VMF, FTK — $10.5M (Department of Defense)
- Base BID for Project NO Zrvl092008 Zanesville Building 1 Renovation — $9.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)