Dod's $16.9M Contract for G-Boss Trainers/Installers Awarded to Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,917,328 ($16.9M)

Contractor: Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-09-29

End Date: 2012-11-30

Contract Duration: 1,158 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: G-BOSS TRAINERS/INSTALLERS

Place of Performance

Location: RED BANK, MONMOUTH County, NEW JERSEY, 07701

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.9 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: G-BOSS TRAINERS/INSTALLERS Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the contract duration and type. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a time and materials contract type posing some cost control challenges. 4. Performance context is within engineering services for the Department of the Army. 5. Sector positioning is within defense services, a significant area of federal spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of approximately $16.9 million over 1158 days suggests a daily rate of around $14,592. This rate needs to be benchmarked against similar engineering services contracts for trainers and installers. Without specific per-unit cost data for trainers or installation hours, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the duration and scope imply a substantial project, and the time and materials (T&M) pricing structure can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of 3 bids suggests a reasonable level of competition. A competitive bidding process generally helps in achieving fair market prices and encourages contractors to offer their best value propositions.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at competitive prices, thereby optimizing the use of public funds.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from specialized training and installation services for the G-BOSS system. This contract supports the operational readiness and effectiveness of Army personnel through system training. The geographic impact is primarily in New Jersey, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for trainers and installers within MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials (T&M) contract type can lead to cost uncertainty if not managed diligently.
Limited public information on specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor efficiency.
The contract duration of over three years requires ongoing monitoring to ensure continued value.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
Contractor has a track record with the Department of Defense, suggesting familiarity with requirements.
The contract addresses a specific need for training and installation, contributing to system readiness.

Sector Analysis

The defense sector, particularly engineering services, is a critical component of federal spending. This contract falls under engineering services (NAICS 541330), which encompasses a wide range of activities supporting military systems. Spending in this category is often driven by the need for specialized technical expertise to maintain and enhance complex defense platforms. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for system training and installation services within the Department of Defense and other federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses as suppliers or partners, which could indirectly benefit them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would include performance reviews, adherence to contract terms, and delivery of services as specified. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance data may be limited. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Training Contracts
Engineering Services for Military Systems
G-BOSS System Support
Army Logistics and Readiness Programs

Risk Flags

Time and Materials contract type requires robust oversight to control costs.
Limited data on specific performance metrics hinders detailed value assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.9 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. G-BOSS TRAINERS/INSTALLERS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-09-29. End: 2012-11-30.

What is the historical spending pattern for G-BOSS trainers and installers by the Department of the Army?

Analyzing historical spending for G-BOSS trainers and installers by the Department of the Army requires access to detailed contract databases beyond the provided data. However, the award of this $16.9 million contract in 2009 suggests a sustained need for these services. Federal spending on defense training and system support is generally consistent, fluctuating based on modernization efforts, operational tempo, and budget allocations. To provide a comprehensive historical view, one would need to aggregate data for similar contracts over several fiscal years, identifying trends in contract values, durations, and the number of awarded contracts to understand the overall investment in this capability.

How does the per-unit cost of training or installation under this contract compare to industry benchmarks?

The provided data does not include specific per-unit cost breakdowns for training sessions or installation hours, making a direct comparison to industry benchmarks impossible. The contract is a Time and Materials (T&M) type, which bills based on labor hours and material costs incurred. To assess per-unit cost, we would need to know the number of hours billed per trainer, the hourly rates, and the cost of any materials used for each training event or installation. Industry benchmarks for specialized technical training and installation services can vary significantly based on complexity, required certifications, and geographic location. Without these granular details, a value-for-money assessment based on per-unit costs cannot be definitively made.

What is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.'s track record with similar Department of Defense contracts?

MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. has a history of contracting with the Department of Defense, as evidenced by this award. To fully assess their track record, a broader review of their past performance on similar contracts would be necessary. This would involve examining contract databases for other awards related to training, installation, engineering services, or system support for defense applications. Key aspects to evaluate would include their performance ratings, any past performance issues or disputes, their ability to deliver on time and within budget on previous projects, and their overall experience with the specific technologies or systems involved. A positive history on comparable contracts would increase confidence in their ability to execute this current award successfully.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for engineering services?

The primary risk associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract, such as this one for engineering services, is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts do not have a ceiling on the total cost, as the government pays for the actual labor hours and materials used. This can lead to unpredictability in final costs if the scope of work expands or if project timelines are extended. For the government, effective oversight and diligent management are crucial to ensure that labor hours are reasonable and necessary, and that material costs are fair. Without strong controls, contractors may have less incentive to control costs, potentially leading to a lower value for taxpayer money.

How does the level of competition (3 bidders) impact the pricing and value for this contract?

Having three bidders in a full and open competition generally suggests a healthy level of market interest and competition. This number of bidders is often considered sufficient to drive competitive pricing, as companies vie for the contract award. It implies that MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. had to offer a competitive price and value proposition to win. While more bidders could potentially lead to even lower prices, three bidders typically provide a good balance, ensuring that the government receives proposals from multiple qualified sources without the administrative burden of evaluating a very large number of bids. This level of competition is generally favorable for taxpayers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Mantech International Corporation (UEI: 053518312)

Address: 12015 LEE JACKSON MEMORIAL HWY, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,396,388

Exercised Options: $16,917,328

Current Obligation: $16,917,328

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W15P7T06DE403

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline