Defense contract for individual equipment awarded to Gentex Corporation for over $10.9 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,921,467 ($10.9M)

Contractor: Gentex Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-12-16

End Date: 2007-03-31

Contract Duration: 470 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200603!600151!2100!W911QY!USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!DAAD1699D1015 !A!N! !N!0014 ! !20051216!20070331!045389988!045389988!045389988!N!GENTEX CORPORATION !324 MAIN ST !SIMPSON !PA!18407!11232!069!42!CARBONDALE !LACKAWANNA !PENN !+000011000000!N!N!000000000000!8465!INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !336413!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!Y!J!2!001!A! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: SIMPSON, LACKAWANNA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 18407

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.9 million to GENTEX CORPORATION for work described as: 200603!600151!2100!W911QY!USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!DAAD1699D1015 !A!N! !N!0014 ! !20051216!20070331!045389988!045389988!045389988!N!GENTEX CORPORATION !324 MAIN ST !SIMPSON !PA!18407!11232!069!42!CARBONDALE !LACK… Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.9 million for individual equipment. 2. Awarded by the Department of Defense, managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency. 3. Contract duration of 470 days, from December 2005 to March 2007. 4. Procurement type was Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs for the government. 5. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 6. The primary contractor is Gentex Corporation, located in Simpson, Pennsylvania.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $10.9 million for individual equipment appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Without specific details on the exact items procured, a direct per-unit cost comparison is difficult. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government secured predictable costs, which is a positive indicator of value for money. Benchmarking against similar large-scale procurements for military personal gear would provide further context on pricing efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided in the data, but the competitive nature of the award process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government. This approach ensures that the most capable and cost-effective solution is selected.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation among suppliers.

Public Impact

Service members benefit from the provision of essential individual equipment. The contract supports the operational readiness of the U.S. military. The geographic impact is primarily centered around the contractor's location in Pennsylvania, with potential distribution to military installations nationwide. The contract supports jobs within Gentex Corporation and its supply chain.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the type and quantity of individual equipment procured.
Limited information on the number of bidders in the full and open competition.
No data provided on contractor past performance or specific quality metrics for this contract.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Contract managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, indicating oversight.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to the procurement of individual equipment for military personnel. The market for military equipment is substantial, driven by government defense budgets. This contract represents a portion of the broader spending on supplies and equipment necessary for military operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large contracts for similar gear or general military supplies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not evident from this specific award. Further investigation into the prime contractor's subcontracting practices would be needed to assess any indirect effects on small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for overseeing contract performance and ensuring compliance. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by establishing a set cost. Transparency regarding the specific equipment procured and performance metrics would enhance accountability.

Related Government Programs

Military Personal Gear Procurement
Department of Defense Supply Chain Management
Individual Combat Equipment Contracts
Defense Logistics Agency Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed itemization for 'Individual Equipment'.
No specific bidder count provided for 'Full and Open Competition'.
No performance metrics or quality assessment data available.
Contractor past performance data not included.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.9 million to GENTEX CORPORATION. 200603!600151!2100!W911QY!USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!DAAD1699D1015 !A!N! !N!0014 ! !20051216!20070331!045389988!045389988!045389988!N!GENTEX CORPORATION !324 MAIN ST !SIMPSON !PA!18407!11232!069!42!CARBONDALE !LACKAWANNA !PENN !+000011000000!N!N!000000000000!8465!INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !336413!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENTEX CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-12-16. End: 2007-03-31.

What specific types of individual equipment were procured under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT' under Product Service Code (PSC) 8465, which covers 'Individual Equipment'. However, the specific items are not detailed. This category can include a wide range of items such as helmets, body armor, load-bearing equipment, uniforms, and personal protective gear. Without further documentation, it is impossible to ascertain the exact nature of the equipment purchased. Understanding the specific items is crucial for a thorough value analysis and for comparing this contract to others in the defense procurement landscape.

How does the $10.9 million contract value compare to similar procurements for individual equipment?

Comparing the $10.9 million contract value requires knowledge of the specific items procured and their quantities. For instance, a contract for advanced body armor would naturally be more expensive per unit than one for basic field gear. The duration of the contract (470 days) also plays a role. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify contracts for similar quantities and types of individual equipment awarded around the same period (2005-2007) or more recent contracts adjusted for inflation and technological advancements. The firm fixed-price nature suggests cost certainty, but the overall value is contingent on the utility and necessity of the equipment provided.

What was the track record of Gentex Corporation with defense contracts prior to or during this period?

The provided data focuses solely on this specific contract and does not offer insight into Gentex Corporation's broader track record. To assess their performance, one would need to examine historical contract awards, performance reviews, and any past issues or commendations related to other government contracts held by Gentex. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or contract databases could reveal patterns in their delivery, quality, and adherence to terms across multiple awards. A review of their history would help determine if this $10.9 million contract was typical, exceptional, or problematic.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how did Gentex Corporation perform against them?

The provided data does not include any information regarding Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Gentex Corporation's performance against them for this contract. Typically, government contracts outline specific metrics for delivery timelines, quality standards, and product specifications. The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) would usually monitor these. Without access to the contract's statement of work or performance reports, it's impossible to evaluate whether Gentex met or exceeded expectations. This lack of detail limits the assessment of the contract's overall success and the value delivered.

Were there any significant risks identified or mitigation strategies employed for this contract?

The provided data does not explicitly list any identified risks or mitigation strategies associated with this contract. However, common risks in procuring individual equipment can include supply chain disruptions, quality control issues, and potential obsolescence of technology. Given the firm fixed-price nature, the primary risk to the contractor would be cost overruns if their initial estimates were inaccurate. The government's risk is primarily centered on receiving equipment that meets specifications and is delivered on time. The management by DCMA suggests a level of oversight intended to mitigate performance risks.

How has federal spending on individual equipment evolved since this contract was awarded?

Federal spending on individual equipment has likely evolved significantly since this contract, which concluded in 2007. Factors such as changes in military operational requirements, advancements in technology (e.g., lighter materials, improved protection, integrated electronics), and shifts in defense budgets would influence spending patterns. Modern procurements might focus more on integrated systems, advanced materials, and potentially higher unit costs due to technological sophistication. Analyzing trends in PSC 8465 and related categories over the past decade and a half would reveal shifts in spending priorities and the types of equipment being acquired.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 324 MAIN ST, SIMPSON, PA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Consolidated Contract: Yes

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAD1699D1015

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline