DoD's $20.76M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to SPECPRO TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,763,417 ($20.8M)

Contractor: Specpro Technical Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-09-01

End Date: 2014-08-31

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: M9543012RCTR066

Place of Performance

Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78232

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.8 million to SPECPRO TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC for work described as: M9543012RCTR066 Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract value of over $20 million indicates a significant investment in facilities support. 3. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government. 4. The duration of 729 days (approximately 2 years) suggests a medium-term service requirement. 5. Awarded by the Department of the Navy, indicating a focus on naval facilities. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 points to facilities support services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract requires more detailed service scope and performance data. However, the fixed-price nature provides some cost control. Without comparable contract data for similar facilities support services within the Department of Defense or other agencies, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The award amount of over $20 million for a two-year period needs to be evaluated against the specific services rendered and the market rates for such services in the Texas region.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. While this indicates an initial intent for broad competition, the 'after exclusion of sources' clause suggests that certain potential bidders may have been excluded at some stage. The number of bidders is not provided, which limits the assessment of the competitive landscape. A truly full and open competition typically involves a broad solicitation to all responsible sources.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive process, even with exclusions, aims to secure the best possible price for taxpayers. The extent of competition directly influences price discovery and the likelihood of achieving cost savings.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy and its personnel, who will receive essential facilities support services. Services delivered likely include maintenance, repair, janitorial, groundskeeping, and potentially security for naval facilities. The geographic impact is concentrated in Texas, where the contractor is based and services are presumably rendered. This contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sector, particularly in Texas.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess service quality.
The 'after exclusion of sources' clause raises questions about the breadth of competition.
Limited transparency on the number of bidders and evaluation criteria.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a competitive process, which generally favors better pricing.
Firm Fixed Price contract type offers budget predictability.
Contractor is based in Texas, potentially supporting local economy.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader Commercial Services sector. This contract represents a significant portion of spending within this niche for the Department of the Navy in Texas. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale facilities management contracts awarded by federal agencies, particularly those supporting military installations. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous providers ranging from small businesses to large corporations.

Small Business Impact

The contract details indicate that small business participation was not a primary set-aside consideration ('ss': false, 'sb': false). There is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award was made to a large business or that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses were not specifically mandated or tracked in this award notice. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Navy, responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring compliance with contract terms. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price structure, where the contractor is responsible for delivering services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is limited by the available data; however, contract award details are generally publicly accessible through federal procurement databases.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support (BOS)
Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Facilities Maintenance and Repair Services
Government Contracting Services

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in award abstract.
Contract value requires thorough benchmarking against similar services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.8 million to SPECPRO TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC. M9543012RCTR066

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SPECPRO TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-09-01. End: 2014-08-31.

What specific facilities support services are included in this contract?

The provided data identifies the contract under NAICS code 561210, which covers Facilities Support Services. This broad category typically encompasses a range of activities such as building maintenance and cleaning, groundskeeping, pest control, security, and potentially utility management. However, the exact scope of services, including specific tasks, performance standards, and deliverables, is not detailed in the provided award abstract. A comprehensive understanding would require reviewing the full contract statement of work (SOW).

How does the $20.76 million contract value compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?

Comparing this $20.76 million contract value requires access to a broader dataset of similar contracts. However, for a duration of approximately two years (729 days), this amount suggests a substantial service requirement. Large-scale facilities support contracts for military bases can range from a few million to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on the size and complexity of the installation. Without specific details on the scope of services and the facilities supported, a direct comparison is difficult. It is advisable to benchmark against contracts for similar-sized naval facilities or installations in comparable geographic regions to assess if the pricing is competitive.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate SPECPRO TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC's performance under this contract?

The provided award abstract does not contain information regarding the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance metrics established for this contract. Typically, government contracts, especially for services, include detailed performance standards and evaluation criteria outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW). These KPIs would likely relate to response times for maintenance requests, quality of cleaning, adherence to safety protocols, and overall customer satisfaction. The absence of this information in the abstract suggests it is detailed within the full contract documentation.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy in Texas?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy in Texas would require a comprehensive review of past contract awards within that specific agency and geographic region. This contract, valued at over $20 million over two years, represents a significant expenditure. To understand the pattern, one would need to aggregate data on similar contracts awarded over several fiscal years, noting trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the contractors involved. This would help determine if this award is consistent with previous spending levels or represents an increase or decrease.

What is the risk associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for facilities support services?

Firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts are generally preferred by the government for services where the scope of work is well-defined, as they shift most of the cost risk to the contractor. For facilities support services, the primary risk for the government under an FFP contract is ensuring that the contractor delivers the required quality and scope of services within the agreed price. If the contractor underestimates costs or encounters unforeseen issues, they bear the loss. Conversely, if the contractor is highly efficient, they may realize higher profit margins. The risk for the contractor lies in accurately estimating all costs, including labor, materials, and overhead, for the entire contract duration.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Bristol BAY Native Corporation (UEI: 060036357)

Address: 1077 CENTRAL PARKWAY SOUTH, SUITE 100, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78232

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,763,417

Exercised Options: $20,763,417

Current Obligation: $20,763,417

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $4,000,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6785410D8024

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline