DoD awards $22M for JBSA San Antonio dorm repairs, with 12 bids received

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,987,172 ($22.0M)

Contractor: Engineering Design Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-10-21

End Date: 2021-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,805 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF REPAIR LACKLAND STUDENT DORMS B10652 AND B10804 AT JBSA SAN ANTONIO, LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

Place of Performance

Location: JBSA LACKLAND, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78236

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $22.0 million to ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF REPAIR LACKLAND STUDENT DORMS B10652 AND B10804 AT JBSA SAN ANTONIO, LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS Key points: 1. Contract value of $21.99M for dormitory repairs at JBSA San Antonio. 2. Competition involved 12 bidders, indicating a reasonably competitive market. 3. Risk indicators appear moderate given the construction nature and fixed-price contract. 4. Project duration of 1805 days spans nearly five years. 5. Contract falls under commercial and institutional building construction sector. 6. Spending on similar construction projects needs benchmarking for value assessment.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $21.99M for dormitory repairs at JBSA San Antonio appears within a typical range for large-scale construction projects. However, without specific details on the scope of work, the condition of the dorms, or the specific repairs undertaken, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar dormitory renovation projects at other military installations or comparable institutional buildings would provide a clearer picture of whether the pricing reflects market rates and efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, with 12 bids received. This level of competition suggests that multiple firms were aware of and interested in the opportunity, which generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors. The exclusion of sources clause might indicate specific technical requirements or prior performance considerations that narrowed the initial pool, but the subsequent open competition with 12 bidders is a positive sign for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition among 12 bidders is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely drove down the final contract price compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario. This competitive pressure helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used more efficiently.

Public Impact

Service members stationed at JBSA San Antonio will benefit from improved living conditions. The contract delivers essential repair and renovation services for critical infrastructure. Geographic impact is localized to JBSA San Antonio, Texas. The project supports jobs in the construction sector within the San Antonio region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long project duration (1805 days) could lead to cost overruns or delays if not managed effectively.
Scope creep in construction projects can significantly increase final costs.
Potential for unforeseen site conditions requiring additional funding or schedule adjustments.
Reliance on a single contractor for an extended period may limit flexibility.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
Full and open competition with 12 bidders suggests a healthy market and competitive pricing.
Awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a focus on military infrastructure needs.
Project location at a major Air Force base (JBSA San Antonio) ensures direct benefit to military personnel.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a broad category encompassing the building and renovation of non-residential structures. The market for such services is typically robust, with numerous firms capable of undertaking large-scale projects. Federal spending in this sector often involves infrastructure improvements, facility upgrades, and new construction for government agencies. Benchmarking would involve comparing this contract's value and scope to other similar military or institutional building projects to assess cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

While the contract was awarded under full and open competition and the data does not indicate a specific small business set-aside, the prime contractor, ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., may have subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The extent to which small businesses participate will depend on the prime contractor's subcontracting plan and the nature of the work required. Further investigation into subcontracting goals and achievements would be necessary to fully assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant contracting command within the Department of the Army. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected during the performance of the contract.

Related Government Programs

Military Housing Construction
Base Infrastructure Renovation
Department of Defense Facilities Management
Construction Services for Federal Agencies

Risk Flags

Extended project duration increases risk of cost escalation and delays.
Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting budget and schedule.
Need for robust oversight due to long contract performance period.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $22.0 million to ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF REPAIR LACKLAND STUDENT DORMS B10652 AND B10804 AT JBSA SAN ANTONIO, LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-10-21. End: 2021-09-30.

What specific repairs were included in the $21.99M contract for JBSA San Antonio dormitories?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'REPAIR LACKLAND STUDENT DORMS B10652 AND B10804 AT JBSA SAN ANTONIO'. However, the specific scope of work, such as the type of repairs (e.g., structural, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, cosmetic), the extent of the damage, and the materials to be used, is not detailed in the summary data. A comprehensive understanding of the value requires a detailed breakdown of the repair items, quantities, and associated costs. Without this granular information, it's difficult to ascertain if the $21.99M represents a fair price for the services rendered.

How does the $21.99M contract value compare to similar dormitory repair projects at other military installations?

Benchmarking this $21.99M contract against similar dormitory repair projects at other military installations is crucial for assessing value for money. Factors such as the size and condition of the dormitories, the specific repairs required, regional labor and material costs, and the overall economic climate at the time of award all influence project costs. A preliminary comparison suggests that for extensive renovations of multiple dormitory buildings, this figure is within a plausible range. However, a detailed analysis would require identifying comparable projects and adjusting for these variables to determine if the pricing is competitive and efficient.

What are the primary risks associated with a nearly five-year construction project like this one?

A project duration of 1805 days (nearly five years) for dormitory repairs presents several significant risks. Firstly, the risk of cost escalation due to inflation in material prices and labor rates over such an extended period is high, even with a firm fixed-price contract, if scope changes or unforeseen issues arise. Secondly, there's an increased likelihood of encountering unforeseen site conditions (e.g., hazardous materials, structural issues not apparent during initial inspection) that could necessitate change orders and budget adjustments. Thirdly, managing a project over such a long timeframe can lead to potential delays, contractor performance degradation, and difficulties in maintaining consistent oversight. Finally, the extended duration might also impact the operational readiness or living conditions of the service members if the repairs are phased or disruptive.

What is the track record of ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in performing similar federal construction contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in performing similar federal construction contracts is not detailed in the provided summary data. To assess their capability and past performance, one would typically review their contract history, including the types and values of previous projects, their on-time and on-budget completion rates, and any past performance evaluations or disputes. A contractor's history of successfully delivering similar projects, especially within the Department of Defense or for institutional buildings, would provide confidence in their ability to execute this JBSA San Antonio dormitory repair contract effectively.

How does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' contracting method impact price discovery and taxpayer value?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' method aims to balance the benefits of broad competition with specific requirements. Initially, certain sources might be excluded based on predefined criteria (e.g., technical capabilities, past performance). However, the subsequent 'full and open competition' among the remaining eligible sources allows multiple bidders to propose solutions. This process generally leads to robust price discovery as numerous firms vie for the contract. For taxpayers, this method can be advantageous if the exclusion criteria are justified and do not unduly limit competition, as it can ensure that technically capable contractors compete, potentially driving down costs and improving the quality of the final service or product delivered.

What are the potential implications of awarding a large construction contract to a single entity for nearly five years?

Awarding a large construction contract to a single entity for nearly five years carries several implications. On the positive side, it can foster a strong working relationship and allow the contractor to develop deep familiarity with the project site and requirements, potentially leading to efficiencies. However, it also concentrates risk with one firm and reduces flexibility. If the contractor underperforms, faces financial difficulties, or encounters unforeseen challenges, the entire project could be jeopardized. Furthermore, a prolonged single-contractor engagement might limit opportunities for incorporating new technologies or innovative approaches that could arise during the project's lifecycle. Continuous and rigorous oversight is essential to mitigate these risks and ensure accountability throughout the extended performance period.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W9126G13R0014

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1705 ENTERPRISE WAY SE STE 200, MARIETTA, GA, 30067

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,354,372

Exercised Options: $21,987,172

Current Obligation: $21,987,172

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W9126G15D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline