DoD Awards $25.6M for Building Construction to Engineering Design Technologies, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,630,816 ($25.6M)
Contractor: Engineering Design Technologies, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2014-09-24
End Date: 2016-07-04
Contract Duration: 649 days
Daily Burn Rate: $39.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: BASE BID- REPAIRS--
Place of Performance
Location: AUGUSTA, RICHMOND County, GEORGIA, 30905
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $25.6 million to ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: BASE BID- REPAIRS-- Key points: 1. The contract value is $25.6 million, awarded by the Department of the Army. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting some limitations. 3. The contract is for building construction, a sector with significant federal spending. 4. The award was a delivery order under a larger contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $25.6 million is substantial for building repairs. Benchmarking against similar construction contracts is difficult without more specific project details, but the price appears within a reasonable range for a project of this scale.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition method was 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting price discovery and competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers are impacted by the $25.6 million expenditure. The limited competition may have resulted in a higher price than if full and open competition had been utilized.
Public Impact
Federal spending on infrastructure and building maintenance is a significant taxpayer concern. The Department of Defense's construction projects are critical for operational readiness. Ensuring fair competition in contracting is vital for taxpayer value and economic fairness.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition after exclusion of sources
- No small business participation noted
Positive Signals
- Awarded by Department of Defense
- Firm Fixed Price contract type
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a sector that sees consistent federal investment for facility maintenance and upgrades. Benchmarks for this sector vary widely based on project scope and location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (sb: false). This suggests the prime contractor is not a small business, and there's no indication of subcontracting to small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was a delivery order, implying it was part of a larger contract vehicle. Oversight would typically involve monitoring performance against the delivery order terms and ensuring compliance with the parent contract's regulations.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition
- No small business participation
- Potential for cost overruns if repairs are more extensive than anticipated
- Contract duration of 649 days
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ga, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $25.6 million to ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. BASE BID- REPAIRS--
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2014-09-24. End: 2016-07-04.
What was the specific nature of the building repairs and their criticality to the Department of Defense's mission?
The specific nature of the repairs is not detailed in the provided data. Understanding the criticality would require examining the Statement of Work (SOW) for the delivery order. Essential repairs to operational facilities would have a direct impact on mission readiness, while less critical upgrades might have a lower immediate impact.
What were the reasons for excluding certain sources in the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' process?
The exclusion of sources typically occurs when specific capabilities, past performance, or unique requirements necessitate a narrowed pool of bidders. The justification for exclusion would need to be documented by the agency, often related to technical specifications, security clearances, or specialized equipment availability.
How does the $25.6 million award compare to the total value of the parent contract and the number of delivery orders issued against it?
The provided data does not include the total value of the parent contract or the number of delivery orders. This information is crucial for understanding the overall scope of the contract vehicle and how this specific award fits into the larger acquisition strategy. It also helps assess the cumulative spending under the contract.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912HN09R0059
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1705 ENTERPRISE WAY SE STE 200, MARIETTA, GA, 30067
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Emerging Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $25,630,816
Exercised Options: $25,630,816
Current Obligation: $25,630,816
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912HN11D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2014-09-24
Current End Date: 2016-07-04
Potential End Date: 2016-07-04 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-10-30
More Contracts from Engineering Design Technologies, Inc.
- Project Number 76364, SOF Battalion Operations Facility, Fort Bragg, NC — $33.5M (Department of Defense)
- Tbup Barracks Rehab Bldg. 29702 and Bldg. 25720 — $24.9M (Department of Defense)
- Base BID: Construction/Renovation of AIT — $24.5M (Department of Defense)
- Tbup FY12 Barracks Buildings 25718&25721, Fort Gordon, GA — $24.1M (Department of Defense)
- Base Item - SOF Group Headquarters — $23.5M (Department of Defense)
View all Engineering Design Technologies, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)