Fort Gordon Barracks Construction Awarded for $24.1M Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,071,961 ($24.1M)
Contractor: Engineering Design Technologies, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2012-09-10
End Date: 2014-02-16
Contract Duration: 524 days
Daily Burn Rate: $45.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: TBUP FY12 BARRACKS BUILDINGS 25718&25721, FORT GORDON, GA
Place of Performance
Location: AUGUSTA, RICHMOND County, GEORGIA, 30905
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.1 million to ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: TBUP FY12 BARRACKS BUILDINGS 25718&25721, FORT GORDON, GA Key points: 1. Construction project for barracks at Fort Gordon, GA. 2. Awarded to ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for $24.1 million. 3. Procurement method was full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 4. Project duration was 524 days, completed on time. 5. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests cost certainty.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $24.1 million for barracks construction appears reasonable given the project scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar construction projects would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The procurement utilized full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and ensures fair market value.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers received a fair price for the construction services.
Public Impact
Improved living conditions for soldiers at Fort Gordon. Supports military readiness and personnel retention. Economic stimulus through construction jobs in Georgia.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope changes.
- Dependence on contractor's ability to meet quality standards.
Positive Signals
- Completed within the planned timeframe.
- Firm Fixed Price contract limits cost uncertainty.
- Competitive award process.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector is crucial for maintaining and upgrading federal facilities, with benchmarks varying significantly based on project type and location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not primary awardees for this specific contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses participated as subcontractors or were excluded from the bidding process.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army managed this procurement. Oversight would typically involve contract administration, quality assurance, and ensuring compliance with federal acquisition regulations.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep impacting cost.
- Contractor performance risk.
- Dependency on specific construction expertise.
- Adequacy of competition despite source exclusion.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ga, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.1 million to ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. TBUP FY12 BARRACKS BUILDINGS 25718&25721, FORT GORDON, GA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-09-10. End: 2014-02-16.
What was the specific reason for excluding certain sources in the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method?
The exclusion of sources in a 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' procurement typically occurs when specific technical requirements or prior work necessitate limiting the pool of eligible bidders. This could be due to proprietary technology, unique expertise, or integration with existing systems. The justification for exclusion must be clearly documented to ensure fairness and prevent undue restriction of competition.
How does the final cost compare to the initial estimated cost for this barracks construction project?
The provided data does not include the initial estimated cost for the barracks construction project. Therefore, a direct comparison to the final award amount of $24.1 million cannot be made. Understanding the estimated cost would be crucial for assessing the efficiency of the bidding process and the contractor's pricing strategy.
Were there any performance issues or change orders during the contract period that impacted the final cost or delivery timeline?
The data indicates the contract was completed within the specified duration (524 days) and awarded on a Firm Fixed Price basis, suggesting a stable cost and schedule. However, without detailed contract performance reports, it's impossible to definitively rule out minor issues or change orders that may have been managed within the existing contract framework without significant impact.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912HN09R0059
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1705 ENTERPRISE WAY SE STE 200, MARIETTA, GA, 30067
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Emerging Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,071,961
Exercised Options: $24,071,961
Current Obligation: $24,071,961
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912HN11D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-09-10
Current End Date: 2014-02-16
Potential End Date: 2014-02-16 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-10-17
More Contracts from Engineering Design Technologies, Inc.
- Project Number 76364, SOF Battalion Operations Facility, Fort Bragg, NC — $33.5M (Department of Defense)
- Base BID- Repairs-- — $25.6M (Department of Defense)
- Tbup Barracks Rehab Bldg. 29702 and Bldg. 25720 — $24.9M (Department of Defense)
- Base BID: Construction/Renovation of AIT — $24.5M (Department of Defense)
- Base Item - SOF Group Headquarters — $23.5M (Department of Defense)
View all Engineering Design Technologies, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)