DoD Awards $11.8M Direct Labor Contract to Bowhead Manufacturing for Facilities Support in Virginia

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,785,016 ($11.8M)

Contractor: Bowhead Manufacturing Company, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-05-01

End Date: 2008-04-30

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $32.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: Other

Official Description: DIRECT LABOR

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22204

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.8 million to BOWHEAD MANUFACTURING COMPANY, L.L.C. for work described as: DIRECT LABOR Key points: 1. Significant direct labor spending of $11.8M highlights the cost of personnel in facilities support. 2. The contract was not available for competition, raising questions about price discovery and potential value. 3. Lack of small business participation is noted, despite the contract's size. 4. The sector is Facilities Support Services, a critical but often overlooked area of government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Pricing is difficult to assess without a competitive benchmark. The contract was not available for competition, suggesting potential for inflated costs compared to a market-driven price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not available for competition. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no market pressure to offer the best price.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in the government paying more than necessary for these services, impacting taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential facilities support services due to a lack of competition. The absence of small business involvement could limit opportunities for smaller, potentially more agile companies. The long duration of the contract (365 days) suggests a need for consistent, ongoing support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 30 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
No small business participation
Limited transparency on pricing

Positive Signals

Direct labor spending clearly identified
Contract supports essential facilities operations

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) are crucial for maintaining government infrastructure. Spending benchmarks vary widely based on the scope and location of services, but direct labor often represents a significant portion of the total cost.

Small Business Impact

This contract did not involve small businesses, as indicated by the 'sb' flag being false. This represents a missed opportunity to engage smaller enterprises in government contracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status warrants further oversight to ensure the government received fair value. Accountability for the pricing and performance rests with the contracting officers.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Support Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition limits price discovery.
Potential for overpayment due to non-competitive award.
No small business participation.
Limited transparency on pricing justification.
Unknown performance metrics and evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.8 million to BOWHEAD MANUFACTURING COMPANY, L.L.C.. DIRECT LABOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOWHEAD MANUFACTURING COMPANY, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-05-01. End: 2008-04-30.

What was the justification for not making this contract available for competition, and what steps were taken to ensure a fair price?

The justification for limiting competition is not provided in the data. Typically, such decisions are based on specific circumstances like urgent needs or the unavailability of multiple responsible sources. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the fairness of the price discovery process. Further investigation into the contract file would be necessary to understand the rationale and the government's efforts to mitigate potential cost overruns.

What is the typical cost range for similar facilities support services in Virginia, and how does this contract's direct labor cost compare?

Benchmarking direct labor costs for facilities support services is challenging without detailed scope of work and labor categories. However, $11.8 million for direct labor over a year suggests a substantial workforce or high-skill labor. A comparative analysis against other government or commercial contracts for similar services in the region would be needed to determine if this cost is reasonable or excessive.

What performance metrics were established for this contract, and how was contractor performance evaluated?

The provided data does not include information on performance metrics or evaluation. Effective oversight requires clear performance standards and regular assessments to ensure the contractor is meeting requirements and delivering value. Without this data, it's difficult to gauge the effectiveness of the services provided under this contract.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W9133L07R0017

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation (UEI: 079253902)

Address: 6700 ARCTIC SPUR RD, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99518

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,785,016

Exercised Options: $11,785,016

Current Obligation: $11,785,016

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W9133L07D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline