DoD's $20M camera suite contract awarded to TKC Global Solutions, raising questions about competition and value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,996,808 ($20.0M)

Contractor: TKC Global Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-12-31

End Date: 2013-12-31

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $54.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: DIGITAL STILL CAMERA SUITE, THERMAL COMP

Place of Performance

Location: STAFFORD, STAFFORD County, VIRGINIA, 22554

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.0 million to TKC GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: DIGITAL STILL CAMERA SUITE, THERMAL COMP Key points: 1. The contract's value of $19.99M for a digital still camera suite and thermal components warrants scrutiny. 2. Awarded as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', the lack of open bidding limits price discovery and potentially inflates costs. 3. The duration of 365 days for a specialized equipment purchase may indicate a need for ongoing support or a pilot program. 4. The specific nature of 'DIGITAL STILL CAMERA SUITE, THERMAL COMP' suggests a niche requirement within the Department of the Navy. 5. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests this contract was not specifically targeted to support small businesses. 6. The 'VA' (Virginia) state code for the contractor's location is noted, but its direct impact on this specific procurement is unclear without further data.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific details on the camera suite's capabilities and market rates for similar thermal imaging equipment. The $19.99M price tag for a one-year duration raises concerns about cost-effectiveness, especially given the lack of competitive bidding. A comparison to other government procurements for advanced imaging systems or commercial off-the-shelf thermal cameras would be necessary to assess if this price represents fair market value. The absence of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to evaluate the return on investment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded under a sole-source justification, meaning it was not openly competed. This typically occurs when only one vendor can provide the required goods or services due to proprietary technology, unique capabilities, or urgent needs. The lack of competition means potential bidders were not given an opportunity to offer their solutions, which can lead to higher prices and less innovation. The Department of the Navy would need to provide a strong justification for why only TKC Global Solutions could fulfill this requirement.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards limit taxpayer value by preventing the government from benefiting from competitive pricing and potentially more innovative solutions from multiple vendors. This can result in higher overall spending for the same or lesser capability.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from the acquisition of specialized digital still and thermal camera equipment. This equipment is likely intended for surveillance, reconnaissance, or operational support missions within naval forces. The geographic impact is primarily within the operational areas of the Department of the Navy, potentially global. Workforce implications may include training for personnel to operate and maintain the new camera systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition may lead to inflated pricing and reduced value for taxpayer dollars.
  • Sole-source awards can stifle innovation by not engaging a broader market of potential suppliers.
  • Insufficient detail on the specific capabilities of the camera suite makes it hard to assess its true necessity and cost-effectiveness.
  • The contract duration of one year for specialized equipment might indicate a short-term need or a gap in longer-term strategic planning.

Positive Signals

  • The award to TKC Global Solutions suggests they possess specialized capabilities or technology required by the Navy.
  • The fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, assuming the scope is well-defined.
  • The contract is for a specific, tangible product (camera suite), indicating a clear deliverable.

Sector Analysis

The defense sector frequently procures advanced imaging and surveillance technologies. Contracts for specialized camera systems, including thermal imaging, are common for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions. The market for such equipment is often characterized by high barriers to entry due to technological complexity and R&D investment. While specific market size data for 'digital still camera suites with thermal components' is not readily available, the broader defense optics and imaging market is substantial, with significant government spending allocated annually. This contract fits within the broader category of defense electronics and sensor procurement.

Small Business Impact

The contract details indicate that this was not a small business set-aside, nor is there information suggesting subcontracting opportunities for small businesses were mandated. The award to TKC Global Solutions, a company that may or may not be a small business itself, does not appear to have been driven by a specific strategy to boost small business participation. Without further information on TKC's size or subcontracting plans, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear, but the lack of set-aside suggests limited direct benefit.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms of the Firm Fixed Price contract, ensuring delivery of the specified camera suite. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, with public details often restricted for national security or proprietary reasons. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

  • Defense Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) Systems
  • Department of Defense Advanced Imaging Technology Procurement
  • Naval Special Warfare Equipment Acquisition
  • Thermal Imaging Systems for Military Applications

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award raises concerns about fair pricing and competition.
  • Lack of detailed specifications makes value assessment difficult.
  • Potential for overpayment due to absence of competitive bidding.

Tags

defense, department-of-the-navy, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, camera-equipment, thermal-imaging, specialized-equipment, virginia, tkc-global-solutions, photographic-equipment-manufacturing

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.0 million to TKC GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, LLC. DIGITAL STILL CAMERA SUITE, THERMAL COMP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TKC GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-12-31. End: 2013-12-31.

What specific capabilities does the 'DIGITAL STILL CAMERA SUITE, THERMAL COMP' offer, and how do they align with the Department of the Navy's operational requirements?

The provided data does not detail the specific capabilities of the camera suite. However, 'digital still camera suite' implies a system for capturing high-resolution still images, likely for documentation, analysis, or intelligence gathering. The inclusion of 'thermal components' indicates the system can also detect infrared radiation, enabling it to see heat signatures. This is crucial for operations in low-light conditions, identifying hidden targets, or monitoring temperature variations. For the Department of the Navy, such a suite could be used for aerial reconnaissance, shipboard surveillance, or ground operations, providing enhanced situational awareness and intelligence gathering capabilities beyond standard visual spectrum cameras. Without further documentation, the exact alignment with specific operational requirements remains speculative.

Can the $19.99M price tag for this camera suite be justified compared to similar commercial or government procurements?

Justifying the $19.99M price tag is difficult without comparative data. The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, which inherently limits price discovery and can lead to higher costs than a competitive procurement. To assess value, one would need to benchmark against similar advanced digital camera systems with integrated thermal imaging capabilities available on the commercial market or procured by other government agencies. Factors such as resolution, sensor type, durability, software integration, and support services significantly influence pricing. Given the lack of competition and detailed specifications, it is plausible that the price could be higher than what might be achieved through a competitive process or compared to less specialized commercial alternatives.

What are the risks associated with awarding a contract of this magnitude on a sole-source basis?

Awarding a $19.99M contract on a sole-source basis carries several risks. Primarily, it risks paying a premium price due to the absence of competitive pressure, potentially leading to inefficient use of taxpayer funds. It also limits the government's access to a wider range of technological solutions and innovations that might be offered by other qualified vendors. Furthermore, sole-source awards can create a perception of favoritism or a lack of transparency, potentially undermining public trust. There's also a risk that the government may not be getting the best possible value or the most suitable technology if alternative solutions were not explored. Finally, it can discourage potential future competitors from entering the market if they perceive opportunities are consistently awarded without competition.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar camera systems by the Department of the Navy or other defense agencies?

Historical spending data for similar camera systems by the Department of the Navy or other defense agencies is not provided in the current dataset. However, advanced imaging and surveillance equipment, including thermal cameras, are a consistent area of procurement within the defense sector. Spending can vary significantly based on technological advancements, specific mission requirements, and the scale of deployment. Agencies like the Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps also procure similar systems. Analyzing past contracts for high-resolution digital cameras, specialized lenses, and integrated thermal imaging modules, especially those awarded competitively, would provide a benchmark for understanding typical price ranges and contract values over time.

What is the track record of TKC Global Solutions, LLC in fulfilling government contracts, particularly for complex technology procurements?

The provided data does not include information on the track record of TKC Global Solutions, LLC. To assess their performance, one would need to review their contract history, including past performance evaluations, any reported contract disputes or terminations, and the successful delivery of goods or services on previous government contracts. Their experience with similar complex technology procurements, such as advanced camera systems or defense electronics, would be particularly relevant. Without this information, it is difficult to gauge their reliability and capability in executing this specific $19.99M contract effectively.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingCommercial and Service Industry Machinery ManufacturingPhotographic and Photocopying Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: PHOTOGRAPHIC EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: M6785412R7002

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Nana Regional Corporation Inc (UEI: 079253761)

Address: 3201 C ST STE 400F, ANCHORAGE, AK, 00

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,996,808

Exercised Options: $19,996,808

Current Obligation: $19,996,808

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6785413D7002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-12-31

Current End Date: 2013-12-31

Potential End Date: 2013-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-05-23

More Contracts from TKC Global Solutions, LLC

View all TKC Global Solutions, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending