DoD's $11.5M Warehousing Contract Awarded to URS Federal Services in 2005

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,508,728 ($11.5M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-14

End Date: 2006-10-31

Contract Duration: 382 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: HILL AFB, DAVIS County, UTAH, 84056

State: Utah Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.5 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract was for general warehousing and storage services, a critical logistical function. 3. The award was made by the Defense Logistics Agency, a key support agency for the DoD. 4. The contract duration was approximately 1 year and 3 months. 5. The contract type was Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 6. The contractor, URS Federal Services, Inc., has a track record with government contracts.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this 2005 contract is challenging due to the age of the data and the lack of specific performance metrics. However, the $11.5 million award for approximately 15 months of general warehousing and storage services suggests a significant operational scope. Without comparable contract data from the same period or detailed breakdowns of services rendered, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor bore the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if managed effectively.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 6 bids suggests a reasonable level of competition for these warehousing services. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government, as contractors vie to win the award.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers likely benefited from a competitive pricing environment, as multiple bidders likely submitted proposals, driving down costs compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract were the Department of Defense units relying on efficient warehousing and storage of supplies. The services delivered included general warehousing and storage, crucial for maintaining operational readiness. The contract was executed in Utah (UT), indicating a specific geographic impact for logistical support. The contract supported the logistical workforce involved in warehousing and supply chain management.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's efficiency and effectiveness beyond the initial award.
The contract's age (awarded in 2005) limits the relevance of current market comparisons for pricing and service delivery.
No information is provided on potential subcontracting, which could impact small business participation.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust and fair bidding process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor, potentially protecting the government from unexpected cost increases.
The Defense Logistics Agency's involvement indicates adherence to established procurement and logistical protocols.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the General Warehousing and Storage sector, a critical component of the broader logistics and supply chain management industry. The market for warehousing services is substantial, driven by the need for efficient storage and distribution across various sectors, including government and commercial. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without more specific details on the scope of services, but large-scale government contracts for warehousing often represent significant investments in maintaining operational capabilities.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (sb: false) and there is no indication of small business subcontracting goals (ss: false). Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal, unless URS Federal Services, Inc. voluntarily engaged small businesses as subcontractors, which is not detailed in this data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), a component of the Department of Defense. DLA has established procedures for contract administration and performance monitoring. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often not publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Defense Logistics Agency Operations
DoD Supply Chain Management
General Warehousing Services
Federal Logistics Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract awarded in 2005, limiting current relevance and comparability.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data.
No information on small business subcontracting utilization.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.5 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-14. End: 2006-10-31.

What was the specific nature of the 'General Warehousing and Storage' services provided under this contract?

The term 'General Warehousing and Storage' typically encompasses a range of services related to the receipt, storage, inventory management, and dispatch of goods. For the Department of Defense, this could include storing military equipment, spare parts, rations, fuel, ammunition, and other essential supplies. Specific activities might involve maintaining climate-controlled environments for sensitive items, tracking inventory levels, ensuring proper handling and safety protocols, and preparing items for shipment or distribution to various military installations or operational theaters. The exact scope would have been detailed in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW).

How does the $11.5 million contract value compare to similar warehousing contracts awarded by the DoD around 2005?

Directly comparing the $11.5 million value of this 2005 contract to similar DoD warehousing contracts from the same period is challenging without access to a comprehensive database of historical contract awards with detailed service scopes. However, $11.5 million for approximately 15 months of service suggests a substantial operational requirement. Factors influencing contract value include the volume and type of goods stored, the geographic location, the duration of the contract, and the specific services required (e.g., specialized storage, inventory management systems, security). Larger, more complex logistical operations would naturally command higher contract values.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate URS Federal Services, Inc.'s performance on this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate URS Federal Services, Inc.'s performance. Typically, for warehousing contracts, KPIs might include metrics such as on-time delivery rates, inventory accuracy, order fulfillment timeliness, facility cleanliness and safety compliance, response times to requests, and adherence to budget. The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) would have established these KPIs in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) to ensure the contractor met the required service levels. Without access to the PWS or performance reports, a detailed assessment of their performance against these metrics is not possible.

What is the track record of URS Federal Services, Inc. with government contracts, particularly with the Department of Defense?

URS Federal Services, Inc. (now part of AECOM) has a significant history of performing contracts for various U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Defense. Their portfolio often includes large-scale engineering, construction, environmental, and operational support services. Prior to its acquisition, URS was a major federal contractor. Their involvement in contracts like this warehousing agreement demonstrates their capability to manage complex logistical operations for the military. A deeper dive into contract databases like FPDS or USAspending would reveal the breadth and value of their past government engagements.

Were there any identified risks or challenges associated with this contract during its performance period?

The provided data does not explicitly detail any specific risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this contract. However, general risks inherent in large warehousing contracts can include supply chain disruptions, fluctuations in demand, facility maintenance issues, labor availability and cost, and ensuring compliance with stringent government regulations regarding storage and security. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract would have placed the onus on URS Federal Services, Inc. to manage these risks effectively to maintain profitability. Any significant issues would typically be documented in contract performance reports or through formal contract modifications.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Warehousing and Storage › General Warehousing and Storage

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 900 CLOPPER ROAD, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SP071002D7004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline