DoD's $21.3M Airfield Operations Contract Awarded to Foreign Entity Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,305,423 ($21.3M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-09-25

End Date: 2011-12-31

Contract Duration: 827 days

Daily Burn Rate: $25.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: [PIIN: W91GY3-09-C-0047] MC - AIRFIELD OPERATIONS

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.3 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: [PIIN: W91GY3-09-C-0047] MC - AIRFIELD OPERATIONS Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $21.3 million, supports airfield operations. 2. Awarded to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES', raising questions about domestic vs. foreign sourcing. 3. Utilized a 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' strategy, suggesting a broad search for qualified bidders. 4. The contract's duration was 827 days, ending in late 2011.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $21.3 million for airfield operations over approximately two years is difficult to benchmark without specific service details. The 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' designation warrants further scrutiny regarding pricing compared to domestic alternatives.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This method aims to achieve competitive pricing, but the specific awardee being a 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEE' might suggest unique circumstances or a lack of domestic capability.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for this contract. While competition was open, the foreign awardee raises questions about maximizing domestic economic benefit and potential cost efficiencies compared to domestic providers.

Public Impact

Potential impact on domestic small businesses in the aviation support sector. Questions regarding the strategic implications of awarding critical airfield operations to foreign entities. Transparency concerns related to the 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' designation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Foreign awardee for critical infrastructure support.
Lack of specific details on 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES'.
Potential for higher costs or security risks with foreign contractors.

Positive Signals

Utilized full and open competition.
Contract completed successfully (based on end date).

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under miscellaneous intermediation services, likely supporting aviation logistics and operations. Benchmarking is challenging due to the broad NAICS code and the foreign awardee, but typical airfield support services can range significantly in cost depending on scope and location.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). The 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' designation further suggests that small business participation was unlikely or not a primary consideration in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically involve the Department of the Army ensuring contract performance and adherence to terms. The 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' aspect might necessitate enhanced oversight to ensure compliance and value for taxpayer money.

Related Government Programs

Miscellaneous Intermediation
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Award to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' for critical operations.
Lack of specific service details for benchmarking.
Potential security and reliability concerns with foreign contractors.
Limited transparency on the selection rationale for a foreign entity.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.3 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. [PIIN: W91GY3-09-C-0047] MC - AIRFIELD OPERATIONS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-09-25. End: 2011-12-31.

What specific services were provided under this 'Airfield Operations' contract, and how did the foreign awardee's bid compare to potential domestic offers?

The specific services are not detailed in the provided data. However, 'Airfield Operations' could encompass a wide range of activities including ground support, maintenance, air traffic control assistance, or logistical management. A comparison of the foreign awardee's bid against domestic alternatives is crucial for assessing value for money, especially given the 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' classification, which could imply unique capabilities or potentially higher costs due to international logistics and regulations.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding airfield operations contracts to miscellaneous foreign entities, particularly concerning security and long-term reliability?

Awarding critical infrastructure operations like airfield support to foreign entities can introduce risks related to national security, data security, and supply chain reliability. Geopolitical instability, differing regulatory environments, and potential communication barriers can impact operational continuity. Ensuring robust vetting, clear contractual obligations, and contingency plans is paramount to mitigate these risks and maintain consistent, secure operations.

How effective was the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' in ensuring the best value for the government, given the foreign awardee?

The effectiveness of 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' in achieving best value is questionable when the awardee is a 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEE'. While the process itself aims for competition, the outcome suggests either a lack of qualified domestic bidders or that the foreign entity offered a uniquely advantageous proposal. Further analysis is needed to determine if the pricing was truly competitive and if the foreign award maximized overall value, considering potential hidden costs or risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Finance and Insurance › Other Financial Investment Activities › Miscellaneous Intermediation

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $50,548,841

Exercised Options: $21,305,423

Current Obligation: $21,305,423

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline