DoD's Army Spends $1.45B on Specialty Trade Contractors for Additional Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,447,708,825 ($1.4B)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-06-16

End Date: 2028-12-30

Contract Duration: 6,772 days

Daily Burn Rate: $213.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: ADDITIONAL SERVICES MCA-FUNDED

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $1.45 billion to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: ADDITIONAL SERVICES MCA-FUNDED Key points: 1. Significant spending on miscellaneous foreign awardees raises questions about domestic economic impact. 2. The contract spans over 18 years, indicating a long-term commitment and potential for cost escalation. 3. Lack of small business participation suggests a missed opportunity for economic inclusion. 4. The broad 'All Other Specialty Trade Contractors' category lacks specificity, potentially obscuring detailed cost drivers.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's large value and extended duration, coupled with a lack of specific performance metrics or benchmarks in the provided data, make a direct pricing assessment difficult. Without comparable contracts for similar 'additional services' from the Army or other agencies, it's hard to determine if the $1.45 billion is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which is generally positive for price discovery. However, the 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' aspect and the broad nature of the services could limit the pool of truly competitive bidders, potentially impacting the final price achieved.

Taxpayer Impact: The substantial $1.45 billion expenditure represents a significant allocation of taxpayer funds. The long duration and foreign awardees warrant scrutiny to ensure maximum value and benefit to the US economy.

Public Impact

Taxpayers are funding extensive specialty trade services over nearly two decades. The contract's duration and foreign awardees may limit direct economic benefits to U.S. small businesses. Oversight is crucial to ensure the services procured are essential and cost-effective throughout the contract's life.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Long contract duration (18+ years)
  • Foreign awardees
  • No small business participation
  • Broad service category

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition
  • Firm fixed price contract type

Sector Analysis

The 'All Other Specialty Trade Contractors' sector is diverse, encompassing a wide range of services. A $1.45 billion contract for such services, especially over an 18-year period, is substantial. Benchmarks for this broad category are difficult to establish without more specific service details.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. This represents a significant missed opportunity to leverage the capabilities of small businesses and foster economic growth within the sector.

Oversight & Accountability

With a contract duration exceeding 18 years and involving foreign awardees, robust oversight is essential. The Department of the Army must ensure diligent monitoring of performance, costs, and adherence to contract terms to maintain accountability and taxpayer value.

Related Government Programs

  • All Other Specialty Trade Contractors
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long-term commitment (18+ years)
  • Foreign awardees
  • Lack of small business participation
  • Vague service description
  • Potential for cost overruns despite FFP due to broad scope

Tags

all-other-specialty-trade-contractors, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, billion-dollar

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $1.45 billion to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. ADDITIONAL SERVICES MCA-FUNDED

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.45 billion.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-06-16. End: 2028-12-30.

What specific 'additional services' are being procured under this contract, and how do they align with the Department of the Army's evolving mission needs over an 18-year period?

The provided data lacks specificity regarding the 'additional services' procured. Understanding the exact nature of these services is critical to assessing their necessity and value over the contract's extensive 18-year duration. Without this detail, it's challenging to determine if the $1.45 billion expenditure aligns with the Army's strategic objectives or if it represents potentially outdated or inefficient service provisions.

What is the rationale for awarding such a long-term contract to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' instead of domestic contractors, and what are the implications for U.S. economic benefit and national s

The rationale for prioritizing foreign awardees for a substantial $1.45 billion contract over an 18-year term is unclear and warrants investigation. While full and open competition was utilized, the focus on foreign entities raises concerns about missed opportunities for U.S. job creation and economic stimulus. Furthermore, reliance on foreign contractors for essential services could pose national security risks that need thorough assessment.

How does the firm fixed price structure mitigate risks associated with the broad 'All Other Specialty Trade Contractors' category and the extended contract duration?

A firm fixed price (FFP) contract is intended to shift cost risk to the contractor, providing budget certainty for the government. However, the broad nature of 'All Other Specialty Trade Contractors' and the 18-year duration present inherent risks. Without detailed service definitions and performance metrics, the FFP may not adequately protect against scope creep, unforeseen cost increases, or contractor underperformance, potentially leading to suboptimal value despite the pricing structure.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionOther Specialty Trade ContractorsAll Other Specialty Trade Contractors

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,494,029,663

Exercised Options: $1,494,029,663

Current Obligation: $1,447,708,825

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-06-16

Current End Date: 2028-12-30

Potential End Date: 2028-12-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-10

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending