DoD's $14.5M Iraqi International Academy contract awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees for construction

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,551,452 ($14.6M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-09-20

End Date: 2011-09-30

Contract Duration: 740 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: [PIIN: W91GY0-09-C-0042] IRAQI INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.6 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: [PIIN: W91GY0-09-C-0042] IRAQI INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY Key points: 1. Contract awarded for industrial building construction services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 3. The contract duration was 740 days. 4. The award was made by the Department of the Army. 5. The contract type was Firm Fixed Price. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $14.5 million for the Iraqi International Academy project represents a significant investment in infrastructure. Benchmarking this cost is challenging without specific details on the scope of construction, materials, and labor involved. However, given the location and the nature of building an academy, the price appears within a reasonable range for such a specialized project, though a detailed cost breakdown would be necessary for a more precise valuation. The firm fixed price contract type suggests that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if managed effectively.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This method is generally preferred as it fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the use of full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process was intended.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential contractors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive bids and achieving the best value for the government's investment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are the students and staff of the Iraqi International Academy, who will gain access to improved educational facilities. The services delivered include the construction of industrial buildings, likely encompassing classrooms, administrative spaces, and potentially specialized learning environments. The geographic impact is concentrated in Iraq, contributing to local development and infrastructure. The project implies a need for skilled labor in construction, potentially benefiting the local workforce in Iraq.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the scope of work and construction materials makes a precise value-for-money assessment difficult.
The geopolitical context of Iraq could introduce unforeseen risks and logistical challenges impacting project timelines and costs.
Limited information on the number of bidders in the full and open competition makes it hard to gauge the true extent of competitive pressure.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent procurement process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor.
The project aims to enhance educational infrastructure, a positive societal impact.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Industrial Building Construction sector, a segment of the broader construction industry. The construction market, particularly in post-conflict or developing regions, can be subject to unique challenges and opportunities. The size of this contract, approximately $14.5 million, is moderate for a government construction project. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other educational facility construction projects funded by the Department of Defense or similar international bodies in similar regions.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a specific requirement, as the 'sb' field is false and no set-aside was mentioned. This suggests that the competition was likely focused on larger firms or those capable of undertaking significant industrial construction projects. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans, so the impact on the small business ecosystem is not directly quantifiable from this data alone, but it implies that opportunities for small businesses would likely arise through subcontracting if they were engaged by the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Army's contracting and project management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency would be facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Construction Contracts
Overseas Educational Facility Construction
Iraq Reconstruction Projects
Industrial Building Projects

Risk Flags

Geopolitical Risk
Logistical Challenges in Iraq
Foreign Contractor Performance Uncertainty

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.6 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. [PIIN: W91GY0-09-C-0042] IRAQI INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-09-20. End: 2011-09-30.

What was the specific scope of work for the Iraqi International Academy construction?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Industrial Building Construction' under PIIN W91GY0-09-C-0042 for the Iraqi International Academy. However, the specific scope of work, such as the number of buildings, square footage, specific facilities (e.g., classrooms, dormitories, administrative offices), and the types of industrial construction involved, is not detailed in the summary data. This level of detail is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the project's requirements and for accurately benchmarking its cost and value. Further investigation into the contract's statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS) would be necessary to ascertain the precise deliverables.

How many bids were received for this full and open competition?

The provided data states the contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' but does not specify the number of bids received. In a full and open competition, the goal is to solicit offers from as many potential sources as are capable of meeting the government's requirements. While the data confirms the procurement method, the actual number of bids submitted is a key indicator of the level of competition achieved. A higher number of bids typically suggests greater interest and potentially more competitive pricing. Without this information, it's difficult to definitively assess the effectiveness of the competition in driving value for the government.

What is the historical spending pattern for the Iraqi International Academy project or similar initiatives by the Department of the Army in Iraq?

The provided data pertains to a single contract (W91GY0-09-C-0042) awarded in 2009 for the Iraqi International Academy, totaling $14.5 million. To understand historical spending patterns, one would need to examine the Department of the Army's procurement history related to educational facilities or infrastructure development in Iraq over a longer period. This would involve searching for prior or subsequent contracts for the same academy, or similar projects at other educational institutions in the region. Analyzing trends in contract values, types, and durations would reveal patterns in investment and identify any significant shifts in spending priorities or execution strategies over time.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this construction contract?

The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this construction contract. Typically, for infrastructure projects like the Iraqi International Academy, KPIs would focus on adherence to schedule (on-time completion), adherence to budget (within the firm fixed price), quality of construction (meeting specifications and standards), safety compliance (zero major incidents), and stakeholder satisfaction (e.g., from the end-users of the academy). The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type itself implies a primary performance metric is delivering the agreed-upon scope within the fixed price. Without access to the contract's SOW or performance reports, these KPIs remain speculative.

What is the track record of 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' as a contractor?

The awardee is listed as 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES,' which is a broad category rather than a specific company name. This designation suggests that the contract was awarded to entities not typically categorized within standard US business classifications, possibly foreign firms or joint ventures operating in Iraq. Assessing a 'track record' for such a general designation is not feasible. To evaluate performance, one would need to identify the specific entity or entities that comprised 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' for this contract and then research their individual performance history on government contracts, particularly those involving construction in complex environments.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Industrial Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,551,452

Exercised Options: $14,551,452

Current Obligation: $14,551,452

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline