Department of the Army awarded $17.8M for medium cargo trucks under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,842,500 ($17.8M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-09-25

End Date: 2009-11-05

Contract Duration: 406 days

Daily Burn Rate: $43.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GY008C0062} MEDIUM CARGO TRUCKS

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GY008C0062} MEDIUM CARGO TRUCKS Key points: 1. The contract value of $17.8 million for medium cargo trucks appears reasonable given the duration and firm-fixed-price nature. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these goods, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. The contract duration of 406 days indicates a need for sustained supply, with potential for follow-on orders. 4. The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' warrants further investigation into the specific entities and their capabilities. 5. The absence of small business set-asides means opportunities for smaller firms may be limited in this specific award. 6. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor, which is generally favorable for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $17.8 million for medium cargo trucks, awarded in 2008, needs to be benchmarked against similar procurements from that era. Given the firm-fixed-price structure and a duration of 406 days, the overall price appears to be within a reasonable range, assuming the trucks met all specified requirements. Without more detailed specifications of the trucks and market conditions at the time, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive nature of the award is a positive indicator.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is expected to drive down prices and improve the quality of offerings. The government likely received multiple proposals, allowing for a thorough evaluation and selection of the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a robust bidding process and ensures that the government is not locked into a single provider, which could lead to price inflation.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army, receiving essential medium cargo trucks for logistical support. The services delivered are the provision of medium cargo trucks, crucial for military operations and transportation. The geographic impact is likely global, supporting Army deployments and operations wherever needed. Workforce implications are minimal for the government, with the primary labor involved being within the contractor's organization.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific contractor identification beyond 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' raises concerns about transparency and accountability.
The age of the data (2008 award) limits its relevance for current market comparisons and performance analysis.
No information is provided on the specific type or capabilities of the medium cargo trucks, making it difficult to assess suitability and value.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that should have yielded favorable pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type minimizes cost overrun risk for the government.
The contract was awarded to meet a specific need for medium cargo trucks, indicating a clear requirement.

Sector Analysis

The procurement of medium cargo trucks falls under the broader defense logistics and equipment sector. This sector is characterized by significant government spending, driven by the need for specialized vehicles and equipment for military operations. Market size for such vehicles is substantial, with numerous domestic and international manufacturers capable of supplying these goods. This contract represents a typical procurement within the defense supply chain, focused on acquiring essential transportation assets.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the procurement was likely aimed at larger-scale manufacturers or distributors capable of fulfilling the order. Consequently, direct subcontracting opportunities for small businesses under this specific award may be limited, unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages them. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular contract is likely minimal.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of the Army contracting office. As a definitive contract awarded in 2008, it would have been subject to standard federal procurement regulations and oversight mechanisms in place at that time. Transparency is limited by the available data, which does not detail specific oversight activities or performance reviews. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Military Vehicle Procurement
Logistics and Transportation Services
Department of Defense Supply Chain Management
Foreign Military Sales (potential if trucks supplied to allies)

Risk Flags

Lack of Specific Contractor Identification
Vague Description of Goods Procured
Dated Procurement Data (2008)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GY008C0062} MEDIUM CARGO TRUCKS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-09-25. End: 2009-11-05.

What specific types and capabilities of medium cargo trucks were procured under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact types or capabilities of the medium cargo trucks procured under PIIN W91GY008C0062. The description is limited to 'MEDIUM CARGO TRUCKS'. To understand the value and suitability, details such as payload capacity, chassis type, engine specifications, environmental operating conditions, and any specialized equipment (e.g., troop transport configurations, cargo bed types) would be necessary. Without this information, it is difficult to assess if the $17.8 million award was appropriate for the specific goods received.

Who were the 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees', and what was their track record?

The designation 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' is highly generic and lacks specificity regarding the actual companies or entities that received the contract funds. This makes it impossible to assess their individual track records, past performance, or reliability. In a typical federal procurement, awardees are identified by name, allowing for due diligence and performance history checks. The vagueness here could indicate a complex contracting structure, a large consortium, or simply a lack of detailed reporting in the source data. Further investigation would be required to identify the specific foreign entities involved.

How does the $17.8 million contract value compare to similar procurements for medium cargo trucks around 2008?

Benchmarking the $17.8 million contract value requires access to comparable data from the 2008-2009 timeframe. Factors such as the number of trucks, specific models, technical specifications (e.g., payload, off-road capability, armor), and included services (e.g., delivery, maintenance) would be crucial for an accurate comparison. Without this granular data, it's challenging to definitively state if the price was high or low. However, given it was a firm-fixed-price contract awarded under full and open competition, the government likely aimed for competitive pricing. The duration of 406 days suggests a significant quantity or a complex delivery schedule.

What were the primary risks associated with this contract, and how were they managed?

Key risks for this contract likely included delivery delays, quality control issues with the trucks, and potential cost overruns if it were not a firm-fixed-price contract. Given the 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' designation, risks related to international logistics, differing regulatory compliance, and communication barriers might also have been present. The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type inherently shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. The government's management of risks would typically involve clear performance standards, inspection and acceptance protocols, and potentially performance bonds. The duration of the contract (406 days) also presents a risk of changing requirements or market conditions.

What was the historical spending pattern for medium cargo trucks by the Department of the Army prior to and following this award?

The provided data only includes a single contract (W91GY008C0062) for medium cargo trucks awarded in 2008. To analyze historical spending patterns, data on all similar procurements by the Department of the Army over several fiscal years would be needed. This would allow for the identification of trends in contract volume, average award values, dominant contract types, and key suppliers. Without a broader dataset, it's impossible to establish a historical spending context for this specific $17.8 million award or to determine if it represented a significant deviation from previous or subsequent spending.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,842,500

Exercised Options: $17,842,500

Current Obligation: $17,842,500

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(F)

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline