Over $41.7 million awarded for administrative management consulting services to support the Iraqi Army

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $41,771,591 ($41.8M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-05-23

End Date: 2011-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,133 days

Daily Burn Rate: $36.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GY008C0027} TIKRIT LOG BASES FOR THE IRAQI ARMY

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $41.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GY008C0027} TIKRIT LOG BASES FOR THE IRAQI ARMY Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. The contract was awarded under a full and open competition. 3. The contract type is a firm fixed price definitive contract. 4. The contract duration was over three years. 5. The awardee is listed as 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES'. 6. The contract was managed by the Department of the Army.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $41.7 million for administrative management consulting over three years is substantial. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, it's difficult to benchmark value for money. The 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' designation suggests a lack of readily available comparative data for similar contracts. The firm fixed-price nature provides cost certainty, but the overall value assessment is limited by the absence of detailed performance and outcome data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The number of bidders is not specified, but the designation suggests a competitive process was intended. A competitive award generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the potential for competitive pricing, ensuring that the government is not overpaying for administrative management consulting services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Iraqi Army, receiving administrative and management support. Services delivered include general management consulting to enhance operational efficiency. The geographic impact is focused on Iraq, supporting military operations. Workforce implications are likely related to the contractor's personnel deployed to support the Iraqi Army.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it hard to assess effectiveness.
The awardee 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' lacks transparency regarding contractor identity and track record.
Limited information on the specific consulting services provided.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair process.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Contract duration of over three years indicates a sustained need for the services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This is a broad category encompassing a wide range of advisory services aimed at improving organizational efficiency and effectiveness. The market for such services is large and diverse, with numerous firms capable of providing support. This contract's focus on supporting a foreign military's administrative functions is a specific niche within this sector.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract involved small business set-asides or subcontracting opportunities. The awardee designation does not provide information on their size or small business status. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor engaged small businesses for subcontracting, which is not specified.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army personnel. Accountability measures would be tied to the firm fixed-price contract terms and performance expectations. Transparency is limited by the lack of detailed public information regarding the specific services and the awardee's background.

Related Government Programs

Foreign Military Sales Support
Defense Consulting Services
Management and Administrative Support Contracts
International Security Assistance

Risk Flags

Lack of transparency regarding awardee identity.
Absence of specific performance metrics.
Difficulty in benchmarking value due to limited comparative data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $41.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GY008C0027} TIKRIT LOG BASES FOR THE IRAQI ARMY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $41.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-05-23. End: 2011-06-30.

What specific administrative and management challenges was the Iraqi Army facing that necessitated this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact administrative and management challenges faced by the Iraqi Army. However, contracts of this nature typically aim to address issues such as improving organizational structure, streamlining processes, enhancing resource management, developing strategic plans, or implementing best practices in administrative functions. The duration of the contract (over three years) suggests a significant and ongoing need for support in these areas, likely related to rebuilding or modernizing military operations and infrastructure.

What is the track record and background of 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' as a contractor?

The designation 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' is highly generic and does not refer to a specific, identifiable contractor with a known track record. This suggests that the award may have been made to an entity not typically registered or tracked within standard US federal contracting databases, or it could be a placeholder for a foreign entity. Without further information or a specific PIIN, it is impossible to assess the contractor's past performance, experience, or reliability. This lack of transparency raises concerns about due diligence and accountability.

How does the $41.7 million contract value compare to similar administrative consulting contracts for foreign militaries?

Benchmarking this $41.7 million contract value against similar contracts for administrative consulting to foreign militaries is challenging due to the limited information available. The specific nature of the services, the geographic location (Iraq), and the recipient (Iraqi Army) are key factors. However, large-scale, multi-year consulting engagements for military organizations can easily reach tens of millions of dollars, especially in post-conflict or capacity-building scenarios. The value appears substantial but requires detailed comparison with contracts for comparable scope and complexity to determine if it represents good value.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables associated with this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or deliverables for this contract. For administrative management consulting services, typical KPIs might include improvements in process efficiency, cost savings achieved, successful implementation of new management systems, or enhanced organizational capacity. The absence of this information in the public record makes it difficult to objectively assess the contractor's performance and the overall effectiveness of the services rendered.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative management consulting services for the Iraqi Army by the Department of Defense?

The provided data focuses on a single contract (W91GY008C0027). To understand historical spending patterns, a broader analysis of contracts awarded to the Iraqi Army for administrative management consulting services by the Department of Defense over multiple fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve querying federal procurement databases for similar contracts, identifying trends in spending, and noting any significant fluctuations or shifts in contracting strategies. Without this broader dataset, it's impossible to establish a historical spending pattern.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $41,771,591

Exercised Options: $41,771,591

Current Obligation: $41,771,591

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(F)

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline