DoD's $26M Contract for Divisional Training Centers Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,955,236 ($26.0M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-03-04
End Date: 2009-03-08
Contract Duration: 369 days
Daily Burn Rate: $70.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: {PIIN: W91GY008C0019} DIVISIONAL TRAINING CENTERS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $26.0 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GY008C0019} DIVISIONAL TRAINING CENTERS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS Key points: 1. The contract value of $25.96 million for training centers suggests a significant investment in operational readiness. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this contract indicates a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. The use of a definitive contract type implies a clear scope of work and established terms. 4. The absence of small business participation warrants further investigation into market accessibility.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $25.96 million for administrative management and general management consulting services is substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large-scale training facility management or consulting services would be necessary to assess its pricing effectiveness.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting multiple bidders were considered. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing, though the specific number of bids received is not detailed.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently, but the ultimate value for money depends on the quality of services delivered and the final price achieved relative to market rates.
Public Impact
Enhances operational readiness and training capabilities for the Department of the Army. Supports diverse training needs across various geographical locations. Potential for long-term impact on military personnel development and mission effectiveness.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 70 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation.
- Foreign awardees may present unique logistical or oversight challenges.
- Fixed-price contract type could shift risk to the contractor, but scope creep could be an issue.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Clear contract type (definitive contract).
- Significant investment in critical training infrastructure.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. Spending in this area by the DoD is often driven by the need for specialized expertise to support complex operations and strategic initiatives.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small businesses were not involved in this award (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the scope or nature of the requirement may have favored larger, potentially international, firms, or that outreach to small businesses was insufficient.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would focus on contract performance, adherence to terms, and ensuring the services provided meet the Army's training objectives. The use of a definitive contract implies a defined scope, which should aid in monitoring.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Foreign awardee considerations.
- Lack of small business participation.
- Potential for scope creep in consulting services.
- Fixed-price contract risks if scope is not well-defined.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $26.0 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GY008C0019} DIVISIONAL TRAINING CENTERS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-03-04. End: 2009-03-08.
What specific management consulting services were provided under this contract, and how did they directly contribute to the effectiveness of divisional training centers?
The contract focused on administrative management and general management consulting services. These likely encompassed areas such as logistical support, operational planning, resource allocation, and potentially curriculum development or training program optimization for the divisional training centers. The effectiveness would be measured by improvements in training efficiency, cost savings, or enhanced readiness outcomes.
Given the award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees,' what are the primary risks associated with contract performance and oversight, and how were these mitigated?
Risks include potential challenges in communication, differing regulatory environments, geopolitical considerations, and difficulties in enforcing contract terms or quality standards. Mitigation strategies might involve stringent vetting processes, clear performance metrics, robust communication protocols, and potentially leveraging host-nation support or specific security arrangements.
How does the fixed-price contract type align with the nature of administrative management and general management consulting services, and what is the potential impact on cost control and contractor pe
A fixed-price contract aims to provide cost certainty. For consulting services, it implies a well-defined scope of work. If the scope is clear, it can incentivize efficiency. However, if unforeseen issues arise or the scope is not perfectly defined, it could lead to contractor disputes or reduced service quality if they try to cut corners to maintain profitability.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $25,955,236
Exercised Options: $25,955,236
Current Obligation: $25,955,236
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-03-04
Current End Date: 2009-03-08
Potential End Date: 2009-03-08 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-07-14
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)