DoD Awards $1.67M for Expeditionary Training Camp Construction, Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,763,250 ($16.8M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-10-01

End Date: 2008-02-12

Contract Duration: 134 days

Daily Burn Rate: $125.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GY008C0011} CONSTRUCT EXPEDITIONARY TRAINING CAMP (SHAIBAH)

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GY008C0011} CONSTRUCT EXPEDITIONARY TRAINING CAMP (SHAIBAH) Key points: 1. Contract awarded for expeditionary training camp construction. 2. Full and open competition was utilized. 3. The contract value is $1.67 million. 4. The awardee is a miscellaneous foreign entity. 5. The contract duration was 134 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $1.67 million for a 134-day construction project appears reasonable given the scope. However, without specific details on the camp's size and features, a precise benchmark is difficult. The firm fixed-price contract suggests a defined scope and cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery. This method allows all eligible contractors to bid, theoretically leading to the most competitive pricing. The award to a miscellaneous foreign awardee suggests a broad reach in the bidding process.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a competitive bidding environment, potentially leading to cost savings.

Public Impact

Supports military readiness by providing essential training facilities. Facilitates international cooperation and training exercises. Contributes to infrastructure development in the region. Potential for job creation during the construction phase.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the construction scope and quality.
Potential geopolitical risks associated with foreign awardees.
Limited information on the small business participation.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition utilized.
Firm fixed-price contract for cost certainty.
Supports critical military training needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under construction services, specifically for building training facilities. Benchmarks for similar expeditionary camp constructions can vary widely based on location, size, and required amenities. The $1.67 million award for a 134-day project suggests a moderately sized undertaking.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor is likely a larger entity.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract management by the Army to ensure timely completion and adherence to specifications. The firm fixed-price nature provides some cost control.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Limited detail on contract scope and deliverables.
Potential geopolitical and logistical risks.
No indication of small business participation.
Awardee category is broad ('miscellaneous foreign awardees').

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GY008C0011} CONSTRUCT EXPEDITIONARY TRAINING CAMP (SHAIBAH)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-10-01. End: 2008-02-12.

What specific features and capacity were included in the expeditionary training camp to justify the $1.67 million cost?

The provided data lacks specific details regarding the camp's features, such as the number of barracks, training areas, utilities, or security infrastructure. To fully assess value, a breakdown of these components and their associated costs would be necessary. Without this, it's challenging to determine if the $1.67 million represents an optimal investment for the intended training capabilities.

What were the primary risks associated with awarding this construction contract to a miscellaneous foreign awardee, and how were they mitigated?

Risks could include geopolitical instability, logistical challenges in a foreign region, differing labor laws and standards, and potential currency fluctuations. Mitigation strategies might involve stringent security protocols, performance bonds, clear contractual clauses addressing these issues, and close monitoring by the contracting officer. The specific mitigation efforts are not detailed in the provided data.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value was obtained for this training camp construction?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging broad participation and competitive pricing. While the process itself is a strong mechanism for achieving value, its effectiveness depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the responsiveness of bidders, and the evaluation criteria used. The award to a 'miscellaneous foreign awardee' suggests the competition reached a wide pool, but the ultimate value realization depends on the final delivered product meeting all requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,763,250

Exercised Options: $16,763,250

Current Obligation: $16,763,250

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline