DoD's $24.8M Medium Trucks & Parts Contract Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,862,000 ($24.9M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-04-30

End Date: 2008-03-25

Contract Duration: 330 days

Daily Burn Rate: $75.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GY007C0030} MEDIUM TRUCKS AND SPARE PARTS

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GY007C0030} MEDIUM TRUCKS AND SPARE PARTS Key points: 1. Contract awarded for medium trucks and spare parts, totaling $24.8 million. 2. Procurement utilized full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The awardee is listed as 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES', raising questions about vendor vetting and domestic economic impact. 4. The contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $24.8 million for medium trucks and parts appears substantial. Without specific unit details or benchmarks for similar procurements, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the duration of 330 days suggests a significant operational need.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely solicited. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for the best value to be determined through the bidding process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition aims to secure the best possible prices for taxpayers by encouraging a wide range of bids and preventing price gouging.

Public Impact

Taxpayers benefit from competitive pricing through the full and open competition method. Availability of medium trucks and spare parts is crucial for military operational readiness. The use of 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' may impact domestic job creation and economic benefits. Transparency in awarding contracts to foreign entities is important for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 75 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Awardee 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' lacks specificity.
  • Potential for less oversight on foreign vendors.
  • Impact on domestic small businesses is unclear as 'sb' is false.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition utilized.
  • Contract awarded by Department of the Army.
  • Clear contract type: Firm Fixed Price.

Sector Analysis

This contract for medium trucks and parts falls under the broader category of defense procurement, specifically related to logistics and equipment. Spending in this sector is critical for maintaining military readiness and operational capabilities. Benchmarks for such procurements vary widely based on vehicle type, quantity, and specific parts required.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this contract ('sb': false). This suggests the contract was either too large or not structured to accommodate small business prime contractors, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller enterprises in this procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense. Standard oversight mechanisms for federal contracts would apply, including performance monitoring and compliance checks. However, the nature of the awardee ('MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES') might necessitate additional scrutiny regarding performance and adherence to terms.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Awardee identification is vague ('MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES').
  • Potential lack of domestic economic benefit.
  • Limited insight into specific parts and truck models procured.
  • Small business participation was not a stated factor.

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GY007C0030} MEDIUM TRUCKS AND SPARE PARTS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-04-30. End: 2008-03-25.

What specific types and quantities of medium trucks and spare parts were procured under this contract, and how do their prices compare to market rates for similar items?

The provided data lacks specific details on the exact types and quantities of medium trucks and spare parts. Without this granular information, a precise comparison to market rates is impossible. The contract value of $24.8 million and a duration of 330 days offer a general scale, but unit pricing and volume discounts significantly influence the overall cost-effectiveness.

What are the risks associated with awarding a significant contract for essential military equipment to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES', particularly concerning supply chain security and vendor reliab

Awarding contracts to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' introduces potential risks related to supply chain integrity, quality control, and geopolitical stability. Ensuring the reliability and security of foreign suppliers for critical military assets requires robust vetting processes and continuous monitoring to mitigate disruptions and maintain operational readiness.

How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the best value for taxpayers, given the potentially vague description of the awardee?

The 'full and open competition' method is designed to maximize value by encouraging broad participation and competitive bidding. However, the vagueness of 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' raises questions about the thoroughness of the vetting process and whether all competitive advantages were fully realized. Transparency in the selection criteria and evaluation of foreign bidders is crucial for confirming optimal taxpayer value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,862,000

Exercised Options: $24,862,000

Current Obligation: $24,862,000

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-04-30

Current End Date: 2008-03-25

Potential End Date: 2008-03-25 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-04-14

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending