DoD Awards $47.2M for Mahalla Power Station Services, Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $47,223,766 ($47.2M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-02-25

End Date: 2008-08-29

Contract Duration: 551 days

Daily Burn Rate: $85.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GXY07C0009} OLD AND NEW MAHALLA POWER STATION

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $47.2 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GXY07C0009} OLD AND NEW MAHALLA POWER STATION Key points: 1. Significant contract value for administrative and management consulting services. 2. Full and open competition indicates a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of 551 days suggests a substantial project scope. 4. Awardee is a miscellaneous foreign entity, requiring careful oversight.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $47.2M for administrative and general management consulting services is substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more specific service details, but the price appears to be within a reasonable range for a project of this duration and scope, assuming effective service delivery.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting multiple bidders participated. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value through a competitive process.

Public Impact

Potential impact on energy infrastructure development in the region. Highlights DoD's engagement in international projects. Transparency in the bidding process is crucial for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Foreign awardee requires enhanced vetting and monitoring.
  • Scope of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' is broad and may lack specificity.
  • Potential for cost overruns if project management is not robust.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition utilized.
  • Firm fixed price contract type limits cost risk.
  • Clear start and end dates provided.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under administrative and general management consulting services, a broad category. The value is significant, suggesting a complex or long-term engagement. Benchmarks for this specific type of service, especially in a foreign context, are challenging to establish without further detail.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the awardee is 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' and does not specify small business participation. There is no indication of small business set-aside or subcontracting goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will be critical given the foreign awardee and the broad nature of the services. The Department of the Army's contracting activity suggests established oversight mechanisms, but their effectiveness in this specific international context needs to be confirmed.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Foreign awardee requires enhanced vetting and monitoring.
  • Broad service description lacks specificity.
  • Potential for performance issues with a foreign entity.
  • Geopolitical risks associated with international contracts.

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $47.2 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GXY07C0009} OLD AND NEW MAHALLA POWER STATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $47.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-02-25. End: 2008-08-29.

What specific administrative and management consulting services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Mahalla Power Station project's success?

The contract description 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' is very broad. To assess value, specific deliverables and outcomes related to the Mahalla Power Station project are needed. Understanding the precise nature of the consulting, such as project management, operational efficiency improvements, or regulatory compliance assistance, would allow for a more accurate evaluation of the $47.2M investment and its impact on the power station's development or operation.

What were the key risks identified during the full and open competition process, and how were they mitigated by the Department of the Army?

While full and open competition generally mitigates price risks, other risks such as performance, security, and geopolitical factors associated with a foreign awardee are significant. The Department of the Army would have needed to conduct thorough due diligence on the 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES,' assess their capacity and reliability, and potentially implement specific contract clauses to manage risks related to international operations, compliance, and project execution.

How effective was the firm fixed price contract type in controlling costs for this $47.2M award, considering the 551-day duration?

A firm fixed price contract is designed to provide cost certainty for the government. For a 551-day contract valued at $47.2M, this contract type aimed to shift the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. Its effectiveness would depend on the accuracy of the initial cost estimates, the contractor's ability to manage resources efficiently, and the robustness of contract administration in preventing scope creep or unforeseen issues that could necessitate contract modifications.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $47,223,766

Exercised Options: $47,223,766

Current Obligation: $47,223,766

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-02-25

Current End Date: 2008-08-29

Potential End Date: 2008-08-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-04-14

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending