DoD's $14.5M contract for power station services shows administrative management consulting costs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,479,866 ($14.5M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-12-01

End Date: 2008-04-05

Contract Duration: 491 days

Daily Burn Rate: $29.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GXY07C0005} SERVICE AND SUPPLIES TO AL QUDIS POWER STATION.

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.5 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GXY07C0005} SERVICE AND SUPPLIES TO AL QUDIS POWER STATION. Key points: 1. Contract value of $14.5M for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Awarded by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense. 3. Utilized a full and open competition procurement method. 4. Contract type is a definitive contract with a firm fixed price. 5. Duration of the contract was 491 days. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $14.5 million for administrative management and general management consulting services is difficult to benchmark without specific deliverables. The firm fixed price suggests a defined scope, but the lack of detailed service descriptions or comparable contracts makes a precise value-for-money assessment challenging. The duration of 491 days for services related to a power station suggests a focused, project-based engagement. Further analysis would require understanding the specific consulting tasks performed and their impact on the power station's operations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but the use of this procurement method generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the most advantageous offer. The open competition suggests a healthy market for these types of administrative management consulting services.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the potential for competitive pricing and the assurance that the government sought the best value through an open bidding process.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of Defense and its operational units, specifically those managing or overseeing the Al Qudis Power Station. The services delivered are administrative management and general management consulting, aimed at improving the efficiency or effectiveness of operations at the power station. The geographic impact is localized to the region where the Al Qudis Power Station is located. Workforce implications are not explicitly detailed but could involve the deployment of specialized consulting personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed service descriptions makes it hard to assess the true value and necessity of the consulting services.
Limited information on the number of bidders in the full and open competition could obscure potential price advantages missed.
The contract's focus on administrative management for a power station might indicate underlying operational or logistical challenges requiring external expertise.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Firm fixed price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
The contract duration is defined, allowing for clear project timelines and management.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the administrative management and general management consulting services sector, a broad category encompassing advisory services for businesses and government organizations. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in areas like operational efficiency, strategic planning, and organizational development. The total federal spending on management consulting services is substantial, with agencies frequently engaging contractors to support complex operations and policy implementation. This specific contract's focus on a power station suggests a niche application within a critical infrastructure sector.

Small Business Impact

This contract did not include a small business set-aside, as indicated by the 'sb' field being false. Therefore, small businesses were not specifically targeted for this award. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. The absence of a set-aside suggests that the procurement was likely aimed at larger, more established firms capable of providing the specialized consulting services required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, though detailed performance metrics and deliverables are often not publicly disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Management and Consulting Services
Operational Support Services
Government Administration
Infrastructure Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of specific contractor identification for 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES'.
Ambiguity in the specific services rendered under 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services'.
Difficulty in benchmarking value due to undefined deliverables and scope.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.5 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GXY07C0005} SERVICE AND SUPPLIES TO AL QUDIS POWER STATION.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-12-01. End: 2008-04-05.

What specific administrative management and general management consulting services were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'SERVICE AND SUPPLIES TO AL QUDIS POWER STATION' and falls under NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services). However, the specific nature of the consulting services is not detailed. Typically, such contracts could involve process improvement, organizational restructuring, strategic planning, operational efficiency analysis, or logistical support for the power station's management. Without further documentation, the exact scope of work remains unspecified, making it difficult to assess the direct impact or necessity of the consulting engagement.

How does the $14.5 million contract value compare to similar administrative consulting contracts for power stations?

Benchmarking this $14.5 million contract value against similar administrative consulting services for power stations is challenging due to the limited public data on specific deliverables and contract scopes. Consulting fees can vary widely based on the complexity of the project, the duration, the expertise required, and the geographic location. Contracts for critical infrastructure like power stations might command higher values due to the high stakes involved. However, without comparable contract details (e.g., specific services rendered, duration, number of consultants, and their rates), a direct comparison to ascertain value for money is not feasible. The firm fixed price suggests a defined scope, but the absence of that scope in the provided data limits comparative analysis.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not include information on the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics established for this contract. For administrative management and general management consulting services, KPIs could range from improvements in operational efficiency, cost savings achieved, successful implementation of new management strategies, or enhanced organizational effectiveness at the Al Qudis Power Station. The firm fixed price nature of the contract implies that the contractor was expected to deliver a defined scope of work, and performance would be evaluated against that scope. However, the specific metrics used for evaluation are not publicly available in this dataset.

What was the track record of the contractor (MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES) prior to this award?

The entity 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' is a broad designation and does not refer to a specific, identifiable contractor with a readily available track record in public databases. This designation often implies that the award was made to entities outside the United States, potentially through specific procurement channels for foreign entities or as a collective term for multiple small foreign awards. Without a specific contractor name or Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), it is impossible to assess their past performance, experience, or reliability for this particular contract. This lack of specific contractor identification hinders a thorough assessment of their track record.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative management consulting services by the Department of the Army for power station operations?

The provided data only includes details for this single contract (W91GXY07C0005). To analyze historical spending patterns for administrative management consulting services by the Department of the Army related to power station operations, a broader dataset encompassing multiple contracts over several fiscal years would be required. This would involve querying federal procurement databases for similar contracts awarded by the Department of the Army, filtering by relevant NAICS codes (like 541611) and keywords related to 'power station' or 'energy infrastructure'. Without such a comprehensive analysis, it's impossible to identify trends, average spending, or significant shifts in procurement for these services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,479,866

Exercised Options: $14,479,866

Current Obligation: $14,479,866

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(F)

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline