DoD's $29M Ramadi Substation Contract Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,052,017 ($29.1M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-08-14

End Date: 2011-04-15

Contract Duration: 1,705 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GXY06C0072} RAMADI 132KV SUBSTATION

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GXY06C0072} RAMADI 132KV SUBSTATION Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $29.05 million, was awarded by the Department of the Army for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, the contract aimed to secure services for the Ramadi 132KV Substation. 3. The duration of the contract was 1705 days, spanning from August 2006 to April 2011. 4. The contract type was Firm Fixed Price, indicating a set cost for the services rendered. 5. No specific small business participation was noted for this contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking pricing for foreign awardees on infrastructure projects in conflict zones is challenging due to unique risk factors and market conditions. Without specific cost breakdowns or comparable domestic contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting multiple bidders were considered. This method generally promotes competitive pricing, but the specific nature of the services and location may have influenced the final price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were utilized for this contract, with the final price determined through a competitive bidding process. The effectiveness of the competition in securing the best value for taxpayers is subject to further analysis of the awarded price against market benchmarks.

Public Impact

This contract supported critical infrastructure development in Ramadi, potentially impacting local stability and reconstruction efforts. The use of foreign awardees highlights the complexities of contracting in post-conflict environments and the global nature of defense support services. The significant duration and value suggest a substantial project with long-term implications for the region's power infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific small business participation.
Potential for cost overruns in a complex operational environment.
Limited transparency on cost-effectiveness due to foreign awardee status.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Firm Fixed Price contract type can provide cost certainty.
Supported critical infrastructure in a challenging region.

Sector Analysis

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) can encompass a wide range of support functions. Spending in this sector varies greatly depending on the agency and project scope, but infrastructure support in operational theaters often commands higher costs due to inherent risks and logistical challenges.

Small Business Impact

This contract did not appear to have specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses. The awardees were categorized as 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees,' indicating a focus on entities capable of operating in the specified region rather than domestic small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of contracts awarded to foreign entities in operational theaters is crucial to ensure accountability and prevent misuse of funds. The Department of the Army's oversight mechanisms would be key to monitoring performance and adherence to contract terms, though specific details are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' may lack transparency.
Contract duration is substantial (1705 days).
Location in Ramadi implies significant operational risks.
Lack of specific small business participation noted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GXY06C0072} RAMADI 132KV SUBSTATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-08-14. End: 2011-04-15.

What was the specific nature of the 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' provided for the Ramadi 132KV Substation, and how did it contribute to the project's success?

The provided data does not detail the specific services rendered beyond the broad NAICS code. These services likely involved project management, logistical coordination, technical consulting, or administrative support essential for the construction, operation, or maintenance of the substation. The success would be measured by the substation's operational status, reliability, and contribution to the local power grid.

Given the 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' designation and the location, what were the primary risks associated with this contract, and how were they mitigated?

Primary risks likely included geopolitical instability, security threats, logistical challenges in a non-permissive environment, currency fluctuations, and potential for fraud or corruption. Mitigation strategies might have involved stringent security protocols, robust contract monitoring, clear performance metrics, and potentially insurance or risk-sharing agreements, though these are not specified.

How does the $29 million contract value compare to similar infrastructure projects of this scale in comparable regions or under similar operational conditions?

Direct comparison is difficult without more specific project details and regional cost data. However, infrastructure projects in conflict zones or post-conflict reconstruction efforts often incur higher costs due to increased security, logistical, and operational risks. The $29 million for a 132KV substation over nearly five years may be within a reasonable range, but a detailed cost-benefit analysis against benchmarks would be needed for a definitive assessment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,052,017

Exercised Options: $29,052,017

Current Obligation: $29,052,017

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(F)

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline