DoD's $18.4M Consulting Contract for 132KV OHL Double Circuit Awarded to Foreign Firm

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,398,863 ($18.4M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-06-30

End Date: 2008-08-20

Contract Duration: 782 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GXY06C0067} DAHUK-AQRA 132KV OHL DOUBLE CIRCUIT

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GXY06C0067} DAHUK-AQRA 132KV OHL DOUBLE CIRCUIT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' raises questions about domestic sourcing and potential geopolitical risks. 2. The $18.4M contract for administrative and management consulting services lacks specific details on the services rendered, hindering value assessment. 3. Full and open competition was cited, but the award to foreign entities warrants scrutiny regarding the competitive landscape and pricing. 4. The sector context for this specific project (OHL Double Circuit) within administrative consulting is unclear, suggesting potential misclassification or unique circumstances.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $18.4M for administrative and general management consulting services is substantial. Without detailed service descriptions, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts or assess if the pricing reflects fair market value for the specific deliverables.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition. However, the award to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' suggests a broad solicitation, and the impact on price discovery is unclear without knowing the number and nature of competing bids.

Taxpayer Impact: The significant expenditure of $18.4M on consulting services, particularly when awarded to foreign entities, raises questions about the optimal use of taxpayer funds and potential missed opportunities for domestic economic benefit.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be funding services provided by foreign entities, potentially impacting domestic job creation and economic growth. Lack of transparency regarding the specific consulting services provided makes it difficult for the public to understand the value and necessity of this expenditure. The award to foreign contractors could indicate a gap in domestic capabilities or a strategic decision to leverage international expertise, the rationale for which is not publicly detailed.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Award to foreign entities
  • Vague service description
  • High contract value for consulting

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition cited

Sector Analysis

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) is a broad category. The specific application to a 'DAHUK-AQRA 132KV OHL DOUBLE CIRCUIT' is unusual for this NAICS code, suggesting either a specialized consulting need or a potential misclassification. Benchmarking is difficult without clearer service definition.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' and the data indicates 'sb' is false, suggesting no small business participation was explicitly tracked or required for this award. This represents a missed opportunity for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's duration of 782 days (over two years) and significant value warrant robust oversight to ensure deliverables are met and funds are used effectively. The award to foreign entities necessitates careful monitoring of performance and compliance.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Award to foreign entities
  • Lack of specific service details
  • High contract value for consulting
  • Potential for misclassified NAICS code
  • No explicit small business participation noted

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GXY06C0067} DAHUK-AQRA 132KV OHL DOUBLE CIRCUIT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-06-30. End: 2008-08-20.

What specific administrative and management consulting services were provided under this contract, and how did they directly support the 'DAHUK-AQRA 132KV OHL DOUBLE CIRCUIT' project?

The provided data lacks specific details on the consulting services rendered. The 'DAHUK-AQRA 132KV OHL DOUBLE CIRCUIT' suggests a project related to electrical infrastructure, possibly in a foreign location. The consulting likely involved project management, logistical support, or technical advisory services, but the exact nature and value-add remain undefined in the available information.

What were the key risks associated with awarding a $18.4M consulting contract to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES', and what mitigation strategies were employed?

Key risks include potential lack of familiarity with U.S. regulations and standards, geopolitical sensitivities, currency fluctuations, and challenges in performance oversight. Mitigation might have involved stringent contract clauses, performance bonds, and enhanced communication protocols. However, the data does not specify the risks identified or the mitigation measures implemented by the Department of the Army.

How does the effectiveness of consulting services provided by foreign awardees compare to domestic alternatives for similar infrastructure projects, in terms of cost and outcome?

Effectiveness comparisons are difficult without specific performance metrics and detailed service descriptions. While foreign awardees might offer specialized expertise or cost advantages in certain regions, domestic firms often possess deeper understanding of U.S. operational environments and regulatory frameworks. The value proposition hinges on the specific project needs, the quality of services delivered, and the overall cost-benefit analysis.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,398,863

Exercised Options: $18,398,863

Current Obligation: $18,398,863

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-06-30

Current End Date: 2008-08-20

Potential End Date: 2008-08-20 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-04-14

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending