DoD's $11.4M Anbar Substation Contract Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,431,105 ($11.4M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-05-24

End Date: 2008-04-25

Contract Duration: 702 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GXY06C0062} ANBAR SUBSTATION AND FEEDERS

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GXY06C0062} ANBAR SUBSTATION AND FEEDERS Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $11.4 million, was awarded by the Department of the Army for administrative and management consulting services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, the contract aimed to secure services for the Anbar Substation and Feeders. 3. The contract duration was 702 days, ending in April 2008. 4. The use of 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' suggests a broad competition pool but may lack specific vendor identification. 5. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking pricing for this specific contract is challenging due to the 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' designation and the nature of consulting services. The firm fixed-price contract suggests an attempt to establish a clear price ceiling.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were solicited. This method is generally expected to yield competitive pricing, though the specific pricing outcomes are not detailed here.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is intended to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment for contract awards.

Public Impact

This contract supported infrastructure development and management in a foreign operational theater. The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' highlights the complexities of contracting in international environments. The duration of the contract suggests a significant project scope. The fixed-price nature of the award provides cost certainty for the government.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of specific vendor identification for 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'.
  • Potential challenges in oversight and performance monitoring for foreign awardees.
  • The contract was awarded in 2006, and current relevance may be limited.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Firm fixed-price contract type offers cost control.
  • Supported critical infrastructure needs.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under administrative and general management consulting services, a broad category often supporting complex government operations. Benchmarking specific consulting service costs can be difficult due to varying scopes and expertise required.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the award was made to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' and does not specify participation by small businesses. The nature of the award suggests it was likely not targeted towards small business set-asides.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, implying oversight by this agency. However, the 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' designation could present unique oversight challenges, particularly regarding performance and compliance.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Awardee ambiguity ('Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees').
  • Potential for performance and oversight challenges in foreign environments.
  • Limited transparency on specific services rendered.
  • Contract awarded over 15 years ago, limiting current applicability.

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GXY06C0062} ANBAR SUBSTATION AND FEEDERS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-05-24. End: 2008-04-25.

What was the specific nature of the administrative and management consulting services provided for the Anbar Substation and Feeders?

The provided data does not detail the specific consulting services rendered. It broadly categorizes them as 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' Further investigation into contract line item numbers (CLINs) or task orders would be necessary to understand the precise scope of work, such as project management, logistical support, or operational efficiency consulting related to the substation and its power distribution.

What were the primary risks associated with awarding a contract of this nature to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'?

Key risks include potential difficulties in vetting foreign entities, ensuring compliance with U.S. regulations and ethical standards, managing performance across different legal and cultural contexts, and potential currency fluctuation impacts. There could also be challenges in dispute resolution and intellectual property protection. The lack of specific vendor identification exacerbates these risks by obscuring accountability.

How effectively did the 'full and open competition' method ensure value for money in this specific contract award?

While 'full and open competition' is designed to maximize value, its effectiveness here is uncertain without knowing the number and quality of bids received, and the final negotiated price relative to market rates. The 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' category might suggest a less robust competitive landscape than anticipated, potentially impacting the ultimate value achieved for the $11.4 million expenditure.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,431,105

Exercised Options: $11,431,105

Current Obligation: $11,431,105

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(F)

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-05-24

Current End Date: 2008-04-25

Potential End Date: 2008-04-25 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-07-14

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending