DoD's $106M Contract for Construction ECPs Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $106,006,500 ($106.0M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-10-11
End Date: 2008-06-30
Contract Duration: 628 days
Daily Burn Rate: $168.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: {PIIN: W91GEU07C0002} CONSTRUCT ECP'S
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $106.0 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GEU07C0002} CONSTRUCT ECP'S Key points: 1. The contract value of $106M is significant, indicating a substantial project scope. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' designation raises questions about the specific entities involved and their qualifications. 4. The Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) sector is broad and requires clarity on the specific services rendered.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $106M is substantial. Without specific per-unit cost data or comparable contract benchmarks for similar ECP projects, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. The firm fixed price structure provides some cost certainty.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing. However, the nature of 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' might limit the pool of truly comparable domestic bidders, potentially impacting the price discovery process.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers, aiming to secure the best value. The final taxpayer impact depends on the efficiency and effectiveness of the services provided by the foreign awardees.
Public Impact
Potential impact on domestic small businesses that may not have been able to compete with foreign entities. Questions regarding the transparency and oversight of contracts awarded to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'. The long duration of the contract (628 days) suggests a complex and potentially high-impact project.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specificity regarding 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'.
- Potential for less stringent oversight compared to domestic contracts.
- The broad NAICS code may obscure the actual services procured.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Firm fixed price contract type offers cost predictability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. Spending in this sector can vary widely depending on the specific services. Benchmarks are difficult without knowing the precise nature of the 'Construction ECPs'.
Small Business Impact
The contract does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' suggests that small businesses, particularly domestic ones, may have faced significant competition challenges.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight of contracts awarded to foreign entities can be more complex. The Department of the Army's ability to ensure accountability and performance for 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' is crucial for effective spending.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Vague description of services ('Construction ECPs').
- Unspecified 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'.
- Potential for reduced oversight compared to domestic contracts.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
- Long contract duration.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $106.0 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GEU07C0002} CONSTRUCT ECP'S
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $106.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-10-11. End: 2008-06-30.
What specific 'Construction ECPs' were procured under this contract, and how does the $106M value align with industry standards for such projects?
The term 'Construction ECPs' is vague and could refer to a wide range of activities, from minor upgrades to major overhauls. Without further details on the specific scope of work, it's challenging to assess if the $106M represents good value. Industry benchmarks for similar projects would require a precise definition of the ECPs and their scale.
What are the risks associated with awarding a large contract to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees', particularly concerning quality control, security, and compliance?
Awarding contracts to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' introduces risks related to varying quality standards, potential security vulnerabilities, and differing compliance regulations. Ensuring consistent quality control and adherence to US standards requires robust oversight mechanisms. Security vetting of foreign personnel and entities is also paramount to mitigate risks.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the best possible outcome given the awardees were foreign entities?
While 'full and open competition' aims for the best value, its effectiveness can be influenced by the specific pool of bidders. If the 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' were the only or primary entities capable of performing the work, the competition might have been less robust than intended. Assessing effectiveness requires understanding the bidding landscape and the justification for selecting foreign awardees.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $106,006,500
Exercised Options: $106,006,500
Current Obligation: $106,006,500
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(F)
Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-10-11
Current End Date: 2008-06-30
Potential End Date: 2008-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-07-14
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)