DoD Awarded $35.4M for Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees in Q3 2009

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $35,420,320 ($35.4M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-06-15

End Date: 2009-06-15

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: [PIIN: W91GDW-09-D-4028-0001] JUL - SEP 2009 BTW REQMNT

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $35.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: [PIIN: W91GDW-09-D-4028-0001] JUL - SEP 2009 BTW REQMNT Key points: 1. Spending focused on miscellaneous intermediation services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating defined scope and cost. 4. No small business participation noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $35.4M for a single quarter is substantial. Without specific service details or benchmarks for 'Miscellaneous Intermediation,' a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the scale suggests a significant need.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust process for soliciting bids and achieving competitive pricing. This method generally leads to better price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for taxpayer value, as it aims to secure the best possible prices through market forces.

Public Impact

Significant federal spending on miscellaneous services for foreign awardees. Contract awarded during the 2009 fiscal year. Details on the specific nature of 'Miscellaneous Intermediation' are limited, impacting public understanding of the expenditure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detail on specific services provided.
No small business participation.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Firm Fixed Price contract type.

Sector Analysis

The spending falls under miscellaneous intermediation services, a broad category. Benchmarking is challenging without more specific service descriptions, but $35.4M for a quarter indicates a significant procurement within this undefined sector.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. This suggests that the procurement may have been structured in a way that favored larger or specialized entities, or that opportunities were not effectively presented to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was made by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract management and performance monitoring to ensure services meet requirements and funds are used appropriately.

Related Government Programs

Miscellaneous Intermediation
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Vague service description ('Miscellaneous Intermediation').
No small business participation.
Significant expenditure for a single quarter.
Limited information on awardee type (foreign).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $35.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. [PIIN: W91GDW-09-D-4028-0001] JUL - SEP 2009 BTW REQMNT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $35.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-06-15. End: 2009-06-15.

What specific services were procured under 'Miscellaneous Intermediation' for this $35.4M award?

The provided data lacks specific details on the services rendered under the 'Miscellaneous Intermediation' category. This broad classification makes it difficult to ascertain the exact nature of the work performed, the necessity of the services, or the value proposition for the government. Further investigation into contract line item details or performance reports would be required to understand the specifics.

What risks are associated with awarding a large sum for vaguely defined 'Miscellaneous Intermediation' services?

The primary risk is a lack of clear scope, potentially leading to cost overruns, subpar performance, or services that do not fully meet the government's needs. Without precise definitions, it's harder to measure success or hold contractors accountable. There's also a risk of inefficient resource allocation if the services are not critical or could be obtained more cost-effectively through other means.

How effective was the full and open competition in ensuring optimal value for this contract?

While full and open competition is generally a strong mechanism for achieving value, its effectiveness here is partially obscured by the vague service description. The process likely ensured a competitive bidding environment, driving down prices relative to what a sole-source award might yield. However, without knowing the specific service benchmarks or the quality of services delivered, a definitive assessment of 'optimal value' remains challenging.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Finance and Insurance › Other Financial Investment Activities › Miscellaneous Intermediation

Product/Service Code: AGRICULTURAL SUPPLIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $35,420,320

Exercised Options: $35,420,320

Current Obligation: $35,420,320

Timeline