DoD's $43.3M C130 Recovery Contract Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $43,298,555 ($43.3M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-07-20

End Date: 2008-09-15

Contract Duration: 57 days

Daily Burn Rate: $759.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GDW08M4022} ; FUNDING FOR W912CM-05-D-0011 TASK ORDER 0008 AND 0010; FUNDING FOR W912CM-05-D-0011 TASK ORDER 0008 AND 0010; C130 RECOVERY

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $43.3 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GDW08M4022} ; FUNDING FOR W912CM-05-D-0011 TASK ORDER 0008 AND 0010; FUNDING FOR W912CM-05-D-0011 TASK ORDER 0008 AND 0010; C130 RECOVERY Key points: 1. Contract focused on C130 recovery efforts, indicating a critical need for aviation support. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a broad market search for qualified vendors. 3. The contract duration of 57 days points to a short-term, urgent requirement. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictable spending. 5. The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' raises questions about domestic industrial base utilization and oversight. 6. A significant portion of the funding was allocated to task orders 0008 and 0010, suggesting specific project milestones or phases. 7. The contract's primary service is Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services, applied to a technical recovery effort.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to the specific nature of C130 recovery and the award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees.' Without more detailed performance metrics or comparable foreign contract data, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control, but the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the recovery services provided would require further investigation. The relatively short duration suggests a focused effort, which could imply efficient resource allocation if the recovery objectives were met.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that the Department of the Army sought proposals from all responsible sources. The number of bidders is not specified, but the broad competition mechanism is designed to foster price discovery and ensure that the government receives competitive pricing. The use of full and open competition is generally a positive sign for market engagement and potential for cost savings.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the potential for competitive pricing inherent in a full and open competition. This process aims to ensure that the selected vendor offers the best value, thereby optimizing the use of public funds for critical C130 recovery operations.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and potentially the C130 fleet, through the recovery and restoration of aircraft. Services delivered include administrative and general management consulting, specifically applied to the complex task of C130 recovery. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around C130 operational bases or maintenance facilities, though the foreign awardee aspect could imply operations abroad. Workforce implications are unclear but may involve specialized technical and management personnel required for aircraft recovery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' raises concerns about transparency and potential impact on domestic aerospace support capabilities.
  • Lack of specific details on the nature of 'C130 Recovery' makes it difficult to assess the true scope and necessity of the services.
  • The short duration (57 days) might indicate a reactive, rather than proactive, approach to aircraft maintenance or recovery needs.
  • Limited information on performance metrics makes it hard to gauge the effectiveness of the awarded services.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust search for qualified vendors and competitive pricing.
  • Firm-fixed-price contract type helps to control costs and provides budget certainty.
  • The contract addresses a critical need for C130 aircraft recovery, vital for military aviation readiness.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Aerospace and Defense sector, specifically related to aircraft maintenance, repair, and operational support. The market for specialized aircraft recovery services can be niche, often involving highly technical expertise. The total federal spending on related services, such as aircraft maintenance and repair, is substantial, with significant portions allocated to defense contractors. This contract, though specific, represents a component of the broader defense industrial base supporting critical aviation assets like the C130.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a stated requirement or outcome for this contract, as the 'sb' field is false and 'st' is empty. The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' further suggests that small businesses, particularly domestic ones, were unlikely to be direct recipients of this funding. There is no indication of subcontracting plans or set-asides for small businesses within the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. The firm-fixed-price nature provides some cost oversight. However, the award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' may introduce complexities in monitoring performance and ensuring compliance with U.S. regulations and standards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

  • C130 Hercules Aircraft Sustainment
  • Aviation Maintenance and Repair Services
  • Defense Logistics Support
  • Foreign Military Sales Support
  • Aerospace Engineering Services

Risk Flags

  • Foreign Awardee Transparency
  • Oversight of Foreign Contractors
  • Domestic Industrial Base Impact
  • Specificity of Service Description

Tags

defense, department-of-the-army, c130-recovery, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, administrative-management-consulting, foreign-awardees, aviation-support, short-duration, task-order-funding

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $43.3 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GDW08M4022} ; FUNDING FOR W912CM-05-D-0011 TASK ORDER 0008 AND 0010; FUNDING FOR W912CM-05-D-0011 TASK ORDER 0008 AND 0010; C130 RECOVERY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $43.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-07-20. End: 2008-09-15.

What specific C130 recovery challenges necessitated this contract, and what were the key performance objectives?

The provided data identifies the contract's purpose as 'C130 Recovery' and notes funding for specific task orders (0008 and 0010). However, it lacks granular detail on the exact nature of the recovery efforts. This could range from repairing battle damage, addressing logistical failures, or recovering aircraft from difficult operational environments. Key performance objectives are not explicitly stated in the data. Typically, for recovery operations, objectives would focus on timelines for aircraft restoration, adherence to safety standards, and successful return to operational status. Without further documentation, the specific challenges and objectives remain inferred from the contract title and the nature of C130 operations.

How does the $43.3 million cost compare to similar C130 recovery or specialized aviation support contracts?

Directly comparing this $43.3 million contract to 'similar' C130 recovery contracts is difficult without more specific data on the scope and duration of comparable efforts. C130 recovery can encompass a wide range of activities, from minor repairs to extensive overhauls, each with vastly different cost profiles. Furthermore, the award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' suggests a potentially unique operational context or market that may not align with standard domestic contracting benchmarks. Generally, large-scale aviation support and repair contracts for military aircraft can run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on complexity, duration, and the specific aircraft platform. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests an attempt to cap costs, but the unit cost or cost per recovery action is not discernible from the provided data.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a significant contract to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' for C130 recovery?

Awarding contracts to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' can introduce several risks. Firstly, there are potential challenges in oversight and quality assurance, ensuring that services meet U.S. military standards and specifications. Secondly, geopolitical factors or differing regulatory environments could impact performance or create compliance issues. Thirdly, there might be concerns regarding the security of sensitive information or technology. Lastly, such awards can raise questions about the utilization of the domestic industrial base and the potential loss of specialized skills within U.S. companies. While full and open competition was employed, the specific nature of these foreign awardees and their capabilities requires careful vetting and ongoing monitoring to mitigate these risks.

What is the track record of 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' in supporting U.S. Department of Defense aviation contracts?

The designation 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' is a broad categorization and does not refer to a specific entity with a singular track record. It implies that the contract was awarded to one or more foreign entities that do not fit into more specific pre-defined categories. Therefore, assessing a collective track record is challenging. The Department of Defense does engage foreign contractors for various support services, often when specialized capabilities are required or when operating in specific geographic regions. However, the effectiveness, reliability, and compliance history would vary significantly among the individual entities falling under this umbrella term. A thorough review would necessitate identifying the specific awardees and examining their past performance records, if available.

How does the administrative management and general management consulting service classification (NAICS 541611) align with the C130 recovery mission?

The classification of Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) for a C130 recovery mission might seem unconventional at first glance. However, complex recovery operations often require significant logistical planning, project management, resource coordination, and strategic decision-making. These are all areas where management consulting expertise is valuable. The 'consulting' aspect could involve advising on the most efficient recovery strategies, managing the deployment of technical teams, overseeing procurement of necessary parts or services, and ensuring compliance with operational protocols. Therefore, while the core task is recovery, the management and administrative framework supporting it likely necessitated these consulting services to ensure efficiency and effectiveness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $43,298,555

Exercised Options: $43,298,555

Current Obligation: $43,298,555

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-07-20

Current End Date: 2008-09-15

Potential End Date: 2008-09-15 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-04-13

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending