DoD's $24.8M Contract for Consulting Services Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,873,586 ($24.9M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-02-21

End Date: 2008-09-29

Contract Duration: 221 days

Daily Burn Rate: $112.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GDW08F4001} GRANT THORTON PROCUREMENT ASSISTANCE CENTER

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GDW08F4001} GRANT THORTON PROCUREMENT ASSISTANCE CENTER Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $24.8 million. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract is for administrative and general management consulting services. 4. The award was made by the Department of the Army. 5. The contract duration is relatively short at 221 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $24.8 million for consulting services is significant. Benchmarking against similar contracts for administrative and general management consulting is difficult without more specific service details, but the price appears within a reasonable range for a large-scale, short-term engagement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were allowed to submit proposals. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is positive for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through a competitive process.

Public Impact

Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process for consulting services. The Department of the Army received management consulting support. The contract duration suggests a focused, short-term project or task order. The award was made in 2008, indicating historical spending data.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Contract awarded in 2008, may not reflect current market rates.
  • Limited information on specific deliverables and performance metrics.
  • Short duration might indicate a specific, time-bound need.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded via full and open competition.
  • Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
  • Clear agency and service type identified.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under professional, scientific, and technical services, specifically administrative and general management consulting. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on agency needs and economic conditions. The value of $24.8 million is moderate for a federal consulting contract.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the contract was likely awarded to a larger firm capable of handling the scope and requirements.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense. Standard federal procurement oversight processes would apply, including review of the acquisition strategy and contract performance.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Awarded in 2008, potentially outdated pricing.
  • Limited detail on specific services and performance.
  • No small business participation noted.
  • Short contract duration may indicate a specific, limited need.

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GDW08F4001} GRANT THORTON PROCUREMENT ASSISTANCE CENTER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-02-21. End: 2008-09-29.

What were the specific consulting services provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Army's mission?

The contract was for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' Without further details, it's difficult to ascertain the precise nature of the services. However, such contracts typically aim to improve organizational efficiency, strategic planning, process optimization, or policy development within the agency. The contribution would depend on the specific tasks performed and their alignment with the Army's operational or administrative objectives at the time.

Given the 2008 award date, what is the potential risk of the pricing being outdated or unrepresentative of current market conditions?

There is a moderate risk that the pricing is outdated. Federal contracts awarded in 2008 may not reflect current market rates due to inflation, changes in labor costs, and evolving service demands. While a Firm Fixed Price contract provides initial cost certainty, the value benchmarked against today's market could differ significantly. Re-evaluating similar services awarded recently would be necessary for a current assessment.

How effective was the 'full and open competition' in ensuring the best value for the government in this specific instance?

The effectiveness of 'full and open competition' in ensuring best value is difficult to assess solely from the provided data. While the method itself is designed to foster competition and potentially lower prices, the actual outcome depends on the number and quality of bids received, the evaluation criteria used, and the specific needs of the Army. Without knowing the competitive landscape and the final negotiated price relative to proposals, we can only assume the process aimed for optimal value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,873,586

Exercised Options: $24,873,586

Current Obligation: $24,873,586

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-02-21

Current End Date: 2008-09-29

Potential End Date: 2008-09-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-04-13

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending