DoD's $19.79M Satellite TV Contract Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,790,655 ($19.8M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-06-28
End Date: 2009-03-31
Contract Duration: 276 days
Daily Burn Rate: $71.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: {PIIN: W91GDW08C0001} SATELLITE TV-POTF
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $19.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GDW08C0001} SATELLITE TV-POTF Key points: 1. The contract value is $19.79 million. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is 276 days. 4. The awarding agency is the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $19.79 million for administrative management and general management consulting services is a significant amount. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more specific service details, but the price appears to be within a reasonable range for a complex, potentially international, service delivery.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting multiple bidders participated. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing, leading to potentially better value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for this contract. The competitive nature of the award aims to ensure efficient use of these funds.
Public Impact
The contract supports administrative and general management consulting services. Services are being provided to the Department of the Army. The contract involves foreign awardees, potentially indicating international scope or specialized foreign expertise. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential complexity and cost overruns due to foreign awardees.
- Limited duration may indicate a specific, short-term need.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Firm fixed-price contract type.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. Spending in this sector can vary widely depending on the specific services required and the complexity of the engagement. This particular award is substantial for its duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not a primary focus for this award, as the 'sb' field is false and the 'co' field lists 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES'. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was considered or subcontracted.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense, through the Department of the Army, is responsible for oversight. The firm fixed-price contract type provides some cost control, but monitoring performance and adherence to contract terms will be crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of specific service details.
- Potential risks associated with foreign awardees.
- Limited contract duration.
- No explicit mention of small business participation.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $19.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GDW08C0001} SATELLITE TV-POTF
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-06-28. End: 2009-03-31.
What specific administrative and general management consulting services are being provided under this contract, and how do they align with the Army's strategic objectives?
The provided data lacks specifics on the exact nature of the consulting services. Understanding the precise deliverables and their contribution to the Army's mission is essential for assessing the true value and effectiveness of this $19.79 million expenditure. Without this detail, it's difficult to determine if the funds are being optimally utilized for strategic goals.
What are the potential risks associated with awarding a contract of this magnitude to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees', particularly concerning security, compliance, and performance?
Awarding contracts to miscellaneous foreign entities introduces several risks, including potential challenges in vetting, ensuring compliance with U.S. regulations, managing intellectual property, and addressing security concerns. Performance monitoring can also be more complex across different jurisdictions. The government must have robust oversight mechanisms in place to mitigate these risks effectively.
How does the $19.79 million contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar consulting services, considering the 'full and open competition' award method?
While the contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically drives competitive pricing, the value of $19.79 million for administrative and general management consulting services needs context. Benchmarking requires detailed service descriptions and market rates. The 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' aspect might also influence pricing due to specialized expertise or geopolitical factors, making direct comparisons challenging without further information.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,790,655
Exercised Options: $19,790,655
Current Obligation: $19,790,655
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-06-28
Current End Date: 2009-03-31
Potential End Date: 2009-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-04-13
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)