DoD Awards $24.4M for Operation McCalli Management Consulting Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,433,635 ($24.4M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-09-27

End Date: 2008-08-30

Contract Duration: 338 days

Daily Burn Rate: $72.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GDW07C4031} TLSA I OPERATION MCCALLI

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GDW07C4031} TLSA I OPERATION MCCALLI Key points: 1. Contract awarded to miscellaneous foreign awardees for administrative and management consulting. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a broad search for qualified vendors. 3. The contract value is substantial, requiring careful monitoring for efficiency and effectiveness. 4. Focus on administrative and general management consulting services indicates support for operational functions.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $24.4M for a 338-day duration appears high for administrative management consulting. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services is recommended to assess pricing reasonableness.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing. However, the specific details of the bidding process and the number of bids received are not provided, limiting a full assessment of price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for management consulting services. Ensuring value for money through competitive bidding and performance monitoring is crucial for responsible stewardship.

Public Impact

Supports critical administrative and management functions within the Department of the Army. Potential for improved operational efficiency through expert consulting services. Transparency in contract execution is vital given the significant financial outlay.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • High contract value for consulting services.
  • Foreign awardees may present unique oversight challenges.
  • Limited detail on specific deliverables and performance metrics.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
  • Supports essential operational functions.

Sector Analysis

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) is a broad category. Spending in this sector can vary widely depending on the specific needs and complexity of the services required by government agencies.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded to small businesses, as indicated by 'sb: false'. This suggests that the scope or requirements of the contract may have favored larger, potentially international, firms.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of this contract is crucial due to its significant value and the nature of consulting services. The Department of the Army is responsible for ensuring performance, accountability, and proper use of funds.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • High contract value.
  • Foreign awardees.
  • Limited information on specific services and deliverables.
  • Lack of detail on performance metrics.
  • Potential for geopolitical or regulatory risks.

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GDW07C4031} TLSA I OPERATION MCCALLI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-09-27. End: 2008-08-30.

What specific administrative and management challenges did Operation McCalli aim to address, and how will these consulting services directly contribute to resolving them?

The provided data lacks specifics on the operational challenges of 'Operation McCalli'. To assess value, understanding the precise objectives, expected outcomes, and the unique expertise foreign awardees bring to these specific administrative and management issues is essential. Without this context, it's difficult to determine if the $24.4M investment is justified by tangible improvements or problem resolution.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a large consulting contract to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees', and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Risks with foreign awardees can include geopolitical instability, differing legal and regulatory frameworks, currency fluctuations, and challenges in communication or cultural understanding. Mitigation strategies might involve stringent vetting, clear contractual clauses on compliance, robust communication protocols, and potentially performance bonds. The lack of specific risk mitigation details in the data warrants further investigation.

How will the effectiveness and impact of the administrative management consulting services be measured and evaluated to ensure taxpayer value?

Effectiveness measurement should involve clearly defined Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) tied to the specific objectives of Operation McCalli. This could include metrics related to process improvements, cost savings achieved, efficiency gains, or successful implementation of new management strategies. Regular performance reviews and independent evaluations would be necessary to confirm that the consulting services are delivering the intended value and meeting contractual obligations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,433,635

Exercised Options: $24,433,635

Current Obligation: $24,433,635

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-09-27

Current End Date: 2008-08-30

Potential End Date: 2008-08-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-04-14

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending