Department of Defense awarded $14.6M for security services, with a significant portion allocated to consulting

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,611,783 ($14.6M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-06-01

End Date: 2008-03-22

Contract Duration: 295 days

Daily Burn Rate: $49.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GDW07C4005} FOB SECURITY FOR WARHORSE, GABE, NORMANDY&CALDWELL

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.6 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GDW07C4005} FOB SECURITY FOR WARHORSE, GABE, NORMANDY&CALDWELL Key points: 1. The contract's value appears reasonable given the scope of security services and consulting provided. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration was relatively short, indicating a need for immediate or short-term services. 4. The primary service category, Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services, points to a focus on operational efficiency or strategic planning. 5. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a major component of the DoD. 6. The firm-fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $14.6 million for a period of approximately 10 months is within a reasonable range for specialized security and management consulting services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for security support and administrative consulting within the Department of Defense suggests that the pricing was likely competitive. The firm-fixed-price structure further supports value by establishing clear cost expectations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but the use of this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is beneficial for price discovery and ensuring the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically leads to more favorable pricing for taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to offer their best terms and conditions.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from enhanced security and administrative management services. Services delivered likely include security personnel, operational support, and strategic consulting for military installations or operations. The geographic impact is likely concentrated within the operational area of the Department of the Army. Workforce implications may include the deployment of security personnel and consulting staff, potentially impacting local employment in the service area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if consulting services are not clearly defined.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical security functions.
Risk of cost overruns if not managed tightly under the fixed-price structure.

Positive Signals

Utilized full and open competition, maximizing potential for competitive pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
Awarded to a vendor with demonstrated capability in administrative and management consulting.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is crucial for government operations, providing expertise that enhances efficiency and effectiveness. The market size for such services within the federal government is substantial, with numerous contracts awarded annually across various agencies for similar support.

Small Business Impact

The contract details do not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions. Given the nature of the services (security and consulting), it is possible that larger, more specialized firms were the primary bidders. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were made available to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the requiring activity within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics may not always be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Security Services
Management and Consulting Services
Army Support Contracts
Federal Administrative Services

Risk Flags

Short contract duration may indicate urgent need or pilot program.
Description 'FOB SECURITY' could imply deployment in potentially hazardous or remote locations.
Combination of security and consulting services requires careful scope management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.6 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GDW07C4005} FOB SECURITY FOR WARHORSE, GABE, NORMANDY&CALDWELL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-06-01. End: 2008-03-22.

What was the specific nature of the security services provided under this contract?

The contract PIIN W91GDW07C4005, with the description 'FOB SECURITY FOR WARHORSE, GABE, NORMANDY&CALDWELL', suggests that the security services were likely related to physical security at specific locations or for specific operations designated by these codenames. While the contract falls under the NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services), the description points to a blend of security provision and potentially the management or consulting related to those security operations. Without access to the detailed contract statement of work, the precise nature of the security services (e.g., personnel, equipment, surveillance, risk assessment) remains general, but it was clearly a critical requirement for the Department of the Army.

How does the contract value compare to similar security and consulting contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?

The contract value of approximately $14.6 million for a duration of about 10 months is a significant award. Benchmarking requires comparing it to contracts with similar scopes (security services combined with management consulting) and durations within the Department of the Army. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, the government aimed for cost certainty. While specific comparable contract data is not provided here, the value suggests a substantial requirement, likely involving specialized expertise or a considerable security footprint. The average value for such combined service contracts can vary widely, but this figure appears to be within the upper range for short-term, specialized support.

What were the primary risks associated with this contract, and how were they mitigated?

Key risks for this contract likely included performance risk (ensuring the contractor delivered effective security and consulting services), schedule risk (completing the work within the 10-month period), and potentially cost risk if the fixed-price structure was not well-defined. Mitigation strategies would have included thorough pre-award evaluations of the contractor's capabilities, a detailed statement of work, clear performance metrics, and active contract management by the Army. The firm-fixed-price contract itself mitigates cost overrun risk for the government, provided the scope is well-defined and managed.

What is the historical spending pattern for 'FOB SECURITY FOR WARHORSE, GABE, NORMANDY&CALDWELL' or similar services by the Department of the Army?

This specific contract (W91GDW07C4005) was awarded in 2007. To assess historical spending patterns, one would need to examine contract awards for similar services by the Department of the Army over several fiscal years. This would involve searching databases for contracts with related PIINs, descriptions, or NAICS codes (like 541611 or potentially security-related codes). Without that broader search, it's difficult to establish a trend. However, the Department of the Army consistently spends billions on various support services, including security and consulting, making this contract a part of a larger, ongoing expenditure pattern for operational support.

What does the 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' classification imply about the contract's objectives?

The classification under NAICS code 541611 indicates that a primary objective of this contract was to obtain expert advice and assistance in organization, planning, and control. This could encompass a wide range of activities, such as improving operational efficiency, developing strategic plans, reorganizing management structures, or implementing new administrative procedures. When combined with the security service description, it suggests the consulting may have been focused on optimizing security operations, managing security risks, or advising on security policy and procedures within the context of specific military operations or installations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,611,783

Exercised Options: $14,611,783

Current Obligation: $14,611,783

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline