Department of the Army awarded $27M contract for Camp Bucca retro-fit, highlighting administrative management consulting needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,033,000 ($27.0M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-07-22

End Date: 2008-06-02

Contract Duration: 316 days

Daily Burn Rate: $85.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GDW07C2003} CAMP BUCCA -8 CELL RETRO-FIT

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $27.0 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GDW07C2003} CAMP BUCCA -8 CELL RETRO-FIT Key points: 1. The contract value of $27.03 million for administrative management and general management consulting services indicates a significant investment in operational support. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this contract suggests a robust market for specialized consulting services within the Department of Defense. 3. The relatively short duration of 316 days points to a project with a defined scope and timeline, potentially mitigating long-term cost overruns. 4. The use of a Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts risk to the contractor, encouraging cost control and efficient service delivery. 5. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests the primary contractor is likely a larger entity, with potential subcontracting opportunities. 6. The contract's focus on retro-fitting at Camp Bucca implies a need for infrastructure improvement and operational readiness support.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking this contract's value is challenging without specific details on the scope of 'retro-fit' services for an 8-cell facility. However, the $27 million price tag for administrative management consulting over approximately 10 months appears substantial. While the firm fixed-price structure is positive for cost certainty, the per-unit cost for the services rendered is not readily apparent from the provided data. Further analysis would require understanding the specific deliverables and comparing them to similar consulting engagements for facility upgrades or operational support within military contexts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This competitive process is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives the best value. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a healthy level of interest from the market for these administrative management and general management consulting services.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it is designed to drive down costs through market forces, ensuring that public funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely military personnel and operations at Camp Bucca, through improved facilities and administrative support. The services delivered are focused on administrative management and general management consulting, aimed at enhancing the functionality and efficiency of the Camp Bucca facility. The geographic impact is localized to Camp Bucca, a military installation, suggesting a direct impact on military readiness and operational capabilities in that specific area. Workforce implications may include the engagement of specialized consultants and potentially the utilization of local labor for construction or support roles related to the retro-fit.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the scope of 'retro-fit' is not clearly defined and managed.
Risk of contractor performance issues impacting the timeline or quality of the retro-fit.
Dependency on a single awardee for critical administrative and management consulting services.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market, potentially leading to better value.
Defined contract duration (316 days) indicates a focused project scope.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services sector (NAICS 541611). This sector is crucial for government operations, providing expertise in organizational efficiency, process improvement, and strategic planning. The market for these services is broad, encompassing numerous firms ranging from large defense contractors to specialized consulting boutiques. The $27 million award is a significant, though not exceptionally large, sum for a government consulting contract of this nature, reflecting the specialized needs of military installations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the primary awardee is likely a larger entity capable of handling the scope and complexity of the contract. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans, but for a contract of this size and nature, it is common for prime contractors to engage small businesses for specialized support or labor, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Army contracting office responsible for Camp Bucca. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price contract type, which penalizes the contractor for cost overruns. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics and oversight reports may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Military Base Operations Support Contracts
Facility Retro-fit and Renovation Projects
Defense Administrative Services Contracts
Management Consulting Services for Government Agencies

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep in retro-fit projects.
Contractor performance risk impacting project timeline and quality.
Adequacy of defined deliverables for administrative consulting services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $27.0 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GDW07C2003} CAMP BUCCA -8 CELL RETRO-FIT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-07-22. End: 2008-06-02.

What specific administrative management and general management consulting services were required for the Camp Bucca retro-fit?

The provided data does not detail the specific services rendered under contract W91GDW07C2003. However, given the NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) and the context of a 'retro-fit' at Camp Bucca, the services likely encompassed areas such as operational efficiency analysis, process improvement for facility management, strategic planning for resource allocation, organizational structure review, and potentially project management support for the physical retro-fitting aspects. The '8 cell' designation might refer to specific housing, detention, or operational units within the base that required modernization or functional upgrades, necessitating expert consultation on how to best achieve these improvements from an administrative and management perspective.

How does the $27.03 million contract value compare to similar retro-fit projects for military installations?

Comparing the $27.03 million value requires context on the scale and nature of the 'retro-fit' at Camp Bucca. Military base retro-fits can vary dramatically in cost depending on whether they involve structural upgrades, technological modernization, energy efficiency improvements, or simply administrative process enhancements. Without knowing the specifics of the 8-cell retro-fit (e.g., if it's housing, detention facilities, or operational buildings), a direct comparison is difficult. However, for significant infrastructure or operational upgrades at a military installation, $27 million is a substantial but not unprecedented figure, especially if it includes extensive consulting and project management over a defined period.

What are the key risks associated with this Firm Fixed Price contract for the Department of the Army?

While Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contracts are generally favored for cost control, key risks for the Department of the Army include potential scope creep if the retro-fit requirements are not meticulously defined and managed. If the contractor encounters unforeseen issues during the retro-fit that were not adequately accounted for in their fixed price, they might seek change orders, potentially increasing costs. Another risk is contractor performance; if the contractor lacks the expertise or resources to deliver the required administrative and management consulting services effectively, the project could face delays or subpar outcomes, impacting the operational readiness of Camp Bucca. Ensuring robust oversight and clear performance metrics is crucial to mitigate these risks.

What was the historical spending pattern for administrative management consulting services at Camp Bucca prior to this contract?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for administrative management consulting services at Camp Bucca. To assess this, one would need to access historical contract databases and filter for contracts awarded to Camp Bucca or the specific Army command responsible for it, focusing on NAICS code 541611 or similar service categories. Analyzing past spending would reveal trends in the utilization of consulting services, the typical contract values, and the frequency of such awards, providing context for the significance of the $27.03 million award in 2007.

How did the 'full and open competition' process influence the final contract price?

A 'full and open competition' process is designed to leverage market forces to achieve the best possible price for the government. By allowing all responsible sources to bid, the Department of the Army likely received multiple proposals, creating a competitive environment. This competition typically drives down prices as contractors vie for the award, potentially offering more favorable terms and pricing than they might under a sole-source or limited competition scenario. While the exact impact on this specific $27.03 million contract isn't quantifiable without knowing the bid prices, the process itself is a mechanism intended to secure competitive pricing for taxpayers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,033,000

Exercised Options: $27,033,000

Current Obligation: $27,033,000

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline