DoD's $109M Law Enforcement Services Contract Awarded to Science Applications International Corporation Shows Fair Value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $109,217,793 ($109.2M)

Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-04-01

End Date: 2020-11-30

Contract Duration: 2,800 days

Daily Burn Rate: $39.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $109.2 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Key points: 1. The contract demonstrates a reasonable value for the services provided, aligning with industry benchmarks. 2. Competition was robust, indicating a healthy market for these specialized professional services. 3. Risk indicators appear manageable, with no significant red flags identified in the contract's execution. 4. Performance context suggests a stable, long-term engagement for essential law enforcement support. 5. This contract positions within the broader professional services sector, supporting critical government functions.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value of approximately $109 million over its period of performance suggests a fair price for comprehensive law enforcement professional services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized technical and scientific support indicates that the pricing is competitive. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure, while potentially leading to cost overruns if not managed carefully, allows for flexibility in addressing evolving requirements. The overall value proposition appears sound given the critical nature of the services rendered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of three bidders suggests a competitive landscape for these specialized services. A competitive bidding process generally leads to better price discovery and encourages vendors to offer their best terms and pricing, ultimately benefiting the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive award process through potentially lower overall costs and a wider array of innovative solutions being considered. The assurance of a fair market price is a key advantage.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from enhanced law enforcement capabilities and professional support services. Services delivered include a range of professional, scientific, and technical support crucial for law enforcement operations. The contract's impact is primarily within federal law enforcement agencies, supporting their mission objectives. Workforce implications include the employment of skilled professionals in scientific, technical, and analytical roles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost creep in cost-plus contracts if not rigorously monitored.
  • Reliance on a single large contractor for critical services could pose a long-term risk if not managed proactively.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, ensuring market-driven pricing.
  • Contract duration suggests a stable and predictable need for these services.
  • Contractor has a significant presence in government contracting, implying experience and capacity.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of specialized expertise. The specific NAICS code, 541990 (All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services), indicates a diverse set of support functions. The federal government is a major consumer of these services, utilizing them across numerous agencies for everything from research and development to operational support and consulting. Spending in this sector is often driven by national security, scientific advancement, and the need for specialized technical knowledge.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. The award to a large prime contractor like Science Applications International Corporation suggests that the primary focus was on capability and capacity rather than small business participation. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any small business subcontracting opportunities were mandated or voluntarily pursued by the prime.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Army contracting officers and program managers. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure necessitates diligent oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and allocable to the contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract reporting mechanisms, and the Inspector General's office would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

  • Federal Law Enforcement Support Services
  • Professional and Technical Services Contracts
  • Department of Defense Support Services
  • Scientific and Technical Consulting

Risk Flags

  • Cost-plus contract type requires diligent oversight to manage potential cost overruns.
  • Long contract duration necessitates ongoing performance monitoring.
  • Reliance on a single large contractor for critical services.

Tags

professional-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, definitive-contract, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, science-applications-international-corporation, law-enforcement, virginia, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $109.2 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. IGF::OT::IGF LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $109.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-04-01. End: 2020-11-30.

What is the historical spending trend for IGF::OT::IGF LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES contracts?

Historical spending data for this specific contract vehicle, 'IGF::OT::IGF LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,' indicates a significant investment by the Department of Defense. The provided data shows a total award value of $109,217,792.78 over its performance period from April 1, 2013, to November 30, 2020. While this single contract represents a substantial sum, understanding the broader trend would require examining all prior and subsequent contracts awarded under this or similar task order structures for law enforcement professional services. Without access to a comprehensive database of all such contracts over a longer period, it's difficult to establish a definitive spending trend. However, the duration and value of this award suggest a consistent and substantial requirement for these services within the DoD.

How does the contractor's performance on this contract compare to industry standards for similar services?

Assessing Science Applications International Corporation's (SAIC) performance on this specific contract against industry standards requires access to performance evaluations, quality assurance reviews, and potentially past performance questionnaires that are not publicly available in this dataset. However, SAIC is a large, established government contractor with a significant track record across various defense and civilian agencies. Their longevity and continued success in securing large contracts suggest a generally positive performance history. For this particular contract, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition and completed its term without immediate, widely publicized issues implies a level of satisfactory performance. To provide a definitive comparison, one would need to consult internal DoD performance metrics or contractor debriefs, if available.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract of this magnitude?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts, like the one awarded to SAIC, carry inherent risks, particularly at a magnitude of $109 million. The primary risk for the government is cost overrun. While the fee is fixed, the 'cost' portion is reimbursable, meaning the contractor is incentivized to incur costs to perform the work. If costs escalate beyond initial estimates due to unforeseen complexities, scope creep, or inefficient performance, the government bears the financial burden. For the contractor, the risk lies in underestimating costs, which could erode their fixed fee profit margin. Effective management, rigorous oversight, and clear definition of scope are crucial to mitigate these risks. The government must ensure that all costs claimed are reasonable, allocable, and allowable, and that the contractor is performing efficiently.

What is the strategic importance of these law enforcement professional services to the Department of the Army?

The strategic importance of law enforcement professional services to the Department of the Army (DoA) is multifaceted. These services likely support the DoA's internal security, investigative functions, and potentially broader law enforcement missions within military installations or operational theaters. This can include functions such as physical security, investigations into criminal activity, intelligence gathering, and compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. By outsourcing these specialized functions to contractors like SAIC, the DoA can leverage external expertise, maintain operational flexibility, and focus its organic military and civilian personnel on core warfighting and defense missions. The continuity provided by such contracts ensures that critical support functions are consistently available, thereby maintaining order, security, and operational readiness.

How does the competition level (3 bidders) impact the final price and innovation for this type of service?

A competition involving three bidders for a contract of this nature generally strikes a balance between ensuring adequate competition and managing the administrative burden of a solicitation process. Three bidders typically provide enough market pressure to drive competitive pricing and encourage innovative solutions, as each bidder seeks to differentiate themselves. This level of competition suggests that the market is not overly concentrated, allowing multiple capable firms to participate. It is generally considered a healthy number that prevents a 'race to the bottom' while still ensuring that the government receives value. The specific impact on innovation depends on the evaluation criteria used; if innovation is a key factor in the source selection, bidders are more likely to propose novel approaches.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesOther Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesAll Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W91CRB12R0009

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12010 SUNSET HILLS RD, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $109,264,811

Exercised Options: $109,264,811

Current Obligation: $109,217,793

Actual Outlays: $238,110

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $14,840,296

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2013-04-01

Current End Date: 2020-11-30

Potential End Date: 2020-11-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-31

More Contracts from Science Applications International Corporation

View all Science Applications International Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending