DoD's $34.7M Life Support Contract for Adak Island Faces Scrutiny Over Value and Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $34,731,983 ($34.7M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-01-12

End Date: 2011-08-31

Contract Duration: 1,327 days

Daily Burn Rate: $26.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91B4M08C0015} ADRASKAN NTC LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $34.7 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91B4M08C0015} ADRASKAN NTC LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded for life support services at Adak, Alaska, totaling $34.7M. 2. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting. 3. Full and open competition was utilized, but specific pricing benchmarks are unclear. 4. Concerns exist regarding the long duration and potential for cost overruns. 5. No small business participation was noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $34.7M over 1327 days suggests a daily rate of approximately $26,173. Without specific service details or comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess value. The fixed-price nature provides some cost control.

Cost Per Unit: $26,173 (estimated daily)

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad solicitation. However, the lack of detailed performance metrics and the long duration may have limited the number of responsive bids and potentially impacted price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for essential life support services in a remote location. While competition was sought, the long-term nature and potential for scope creep warrant careful monitoring to ensure cost-effectiveness.

Public Impact

Ensures essential life support services for personnel at a remote military installation. Supports operational readiness by maintaining infrastructure and services. The long contract duration raises questions about adaptability to changing needs and potential for price escalation. Lack of small business involvement limits opportunities for smaller enterprises in this contract.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Long contract duration (1327 days)
  • Remote location may limit competition and increase costs
  • Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult
  • No small business participation

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition was utilized
  • Firm fixed-price contract type
  • Essential services provided

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management consulting. Spending in this area can vary widely based on agency needs and contract scope. Benchmarks are difficult without more specific service details.

Small Business Impact

The contract explicitly states no small business participation. This suggests that the prime contractor did not subcontract to small businesses or that the nature of the services did not lend itself to small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would focus on ensuring the contractor meets all life support requirements as stipulated in the contract. Monitoring performance against the firm fixed-price terms and managing any potential scope changes are key accountability measures.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost creep due to long duration
  • Logistical challenges and higher operating costs in remote locations
  • Difficulty in assessing true value without detailed service scope
  • Limited visibility into subcontractor performance (if any)
  • Lack of small business participation

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $34.7 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91B4M08C0015} ADRASKAN NTC LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $34.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-01-12. End: 2011-08-31.

What specific life support services were included, and how were they benchmarked against industry standards to ensure fair pricing?

The provided data lacks specifics on the exact life support services rendered. Benchmarking against industry standards would require detailed service descriptions, labor categories, and quantities. Without this, assessing fair pricing is challenging, though the firm fixed-price structure offers some cost certainty.

Given the remote location and long duration, what measures were in place to mitigate risks of cost overruns and ensure continued service quality?

The firm fixed-price contract type inherently shifts some cost overrun risk to the contractor. However, for a remote location over a long period, contingency planning for logistical challenges, potential price fluctuations in materials or labor, and ensuring contractor solvency are crucial oversight areas.

How effectively did the full and open competition process identify the most capable and cost-effective provider for these specialized services?

While 'full and open' indicates a broad solicitation, its effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the solicitation's requirements and evaluation criteria. The long duration and remote nature might have deterred some potential bidders, potentially limiting the pool of highly competitive offers and impacting the ultimate cost-effectiveness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $38,625,129

Exercised Options: $38,625,129

Current Obligation: $34,731,983

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(F)

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-01-12

Current End Date: 2011-08-31

Potential End Date: 2011-08-31 12:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-08-18

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending