DoD's $97.4M Contract for Consulting Services Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $97,377,879 ($97.4M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-01

End Date: 2011-05-31

Contract Duration: 2,068 days

Daily Burn Rate: $47.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91B4M06C0011} INCREMENTAL FUNDING

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $97.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91B4M06C0011} INCREMENTAL FUNDING Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $97.4 million, was awarded under full and open competition. 2. The awardee is 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES', indicating a broad pool of potential contractors. 3. The contract duration is 2068 days, spanning from October 2005 to May 2011. 4. The service category is Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611). 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, providing cost certainty.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $97.4 million over approximately 5.7 years suggests a significant investment in consulting services. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale, long-term consulting contracts would be necessary to fully assess its value proposition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery, allowing multiple bidders to submit proposals. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing compared to limited or sole-source approaches.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award process likely resulted in a more cost-effective outcome for taxpayers compared to non-competitive methods.

Public Impact

Taxpayers benefit from competitive bidding processes that aim to secure the best value. The long duration suggests a sustained need for these consulting services within the Department of the Army. The 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' designation raises questions about the specific entities performing the work and their geographic location. The lack of specific small business participation noted might indicate missed opportunities for smaller firms.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The Department of Defense frequently procures administrative and management consulting services to support its vast operations. Spending benchmarks for such services can vary widely based on scope, duration, and the specific expertise required.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside or requirement for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the competition was likely focused on larger or foreign entities capable of meeting the contract's demands.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms for its procurements. However, the broad 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' designation warrants further scrutiny to ensure accountability and performance.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $97.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91B4M06C0011} INCREMENTAL FUNDING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $97.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-01. End: 2011-05-31.

What was the specific nature of the administrative and general management consulting services provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Department of the Army's mission?

The contract falls under NAICS code 541611, 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' These services typically involve advising organizations on improving efficiency, management structures, and operational processes. Without further details, it's difficult to pinpoint the exact contributions, but they likely supported strategic planning, organizational reform, or operational enhancements within the Army.

Given the 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' designation, what were the risks associated with performance, security, and intellectual property protection?

Awarding to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' can introduce risks related to geopolitical stability, differing legal frameworks, and potential security vulnerabilities. Ensuring robust contract clauses for intellectual property protection, data security, and performance standards is crucial. The long duration and significant value necessitate diligent monitoring to mitigate these potential risks effectively.

How does the $97.4 million expenditure over 2068 days compare to industry benchmarks for similar consulting services, and was it considered a cost-effective investment?

A direct comparison to industry benchmarks is challenging without knowing the specific services rendered. However, a $97.4 million contract over nearly six years represents a substantial investment. The firm fixed-price structure provides some cost control, but the true cost-effectiveness hinges on the tangible outcomes and efficiencies achieved by the consulting services delivered.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $111,589,637

Exercised Options: $111,589,637

Current Obligation: $97,377,879

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-10-01

Current End Date: 2011-05-31

Potential End Date: 2011-05-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-12-19

More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

View all Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending