DoD Awards $15.1M for Asphalt Road Construction to Foreign Entities Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,092,305 ($15.1M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-09-19

End Date: 2011-03-11

Contract Duration: 538 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 15

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCT ASPHALT-PAVED ROAD

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: CONSTRUCT ASPHALT-PAVED ROAD Key points: 1. Spending focused on highway construction, a common infrastructure need. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The awardee is a miscellaneous foreign entity, raising potential oversight questions. 4. The contract type is firm-fixed-price, which transfers risk to the contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $15.1 million for road construction appears within a reasonable range for a project of this scope. However, without specific project details or comparable bids, a precise valuation is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were allowed to submit proposals. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for infrastructure development, with competition aiming to secure the best value.

Public Impact

Infrastructure development supports economic activity and transportation efficiency. Foreign awardees may present unique logistical and oversight challenges. The use of firm-fixed-price contracts can lead to predictable costs for the government.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Foreign awardee
Lack of specific project details

Positive Signals

Full and open competition
Firm fixed price contract

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the construction sector, specifically highway, street, and bridge construction. Spending in this area is often driven by infrastructure needs and government investment in public works.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award, as the awardee is listed as 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' and 'sb' is false.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of foreign contractors can be more complex than domestic ones, requiring careful monitoring to ensure contract compliance and quality standards are met. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract helps define cost expectations.

Related Government Programs

Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Foreign awardee
Limited project scope detail
Potential for higher oversight burden
Lack of small business participation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.1 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. CONSTRUCT ASPHALT-PAVED ROAD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-09-19. End: 2011-03-11.

What specific road construction activities were included in this $15.1 million contract, and how do they compare to industry benchmarks for similar projects?

The contract specifies 'CONSTRUCT ASPHALT-PAVED ROAD' but lacks granular detail on the scope of work. Benchmarking would require information on project size (e.g., miles paved, complexity of terrain), materials used, and labor costs. Without this, assessing value against industry standards is challenging, though the overall value is substantial for road construction.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a significant construction contract to a 'miscellaneous foreign awardee' under full and open competition?

Risks include potential challenges in contract oversight, quality assurance, and adherence to U.S. labor and environmental standards. There might also be geopolitical considerations or currency exchange rate fluctuations impacting the final cost. Ensuring the foreign entity has the necessary security clearances and operational capacity is also crucial.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for taxpayers in this asphalt road construction contract?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bids. However, the effectiveness depends on the number and quality of bidders, the clarity of the solicitation, and the evaluation criteria. The presence of foreign awardees suggests a broad competition, but without bid details, it's hard to definitively state if the lowest price or best technical solution was achieved.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W917PM09R0021

Offers Received: 15

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,443,353

Exercised Options: $15,092,305

Current Obligation: $15,092,305

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline