Dod's $18.9M Construction Contract for Site Adapt Construction Khogayani Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,944,057 ($18.9M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-06-30

End Date: 2013-01-21

Contract Duration: 1,666 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: SITE ADAPT CONSTRUCTION KHOGAYANI

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: SITE ADAPT CONSTRUCTION KHOGAYANI Key points: 1. The contract value of $18.9 million represents a significant investment in infrastructure. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The duration of 1666 days indicates a long-term project with substantial scope. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which transfers risk to the contractor. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction. 6. The awarding agency is the Department of Defense, with the Department of the Army as the specific service. 7. The contract was awarded on June 30, 2008, and completed on January 21, 2013.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific contract is challenging without detailed cost breakdowns or comparable project data. The $18.9 million expenditure over approximately 4.5 years suggests a substantial project. However, without information on the scope of work, specific deliverables, or market conditions at the time of award, a definitive value-for-money assessment is difficult. The firm fixed-price nature implies that the contractor bore the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator if the final price was competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With 3 bidders identified, the competition level appears moderate. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors. The fact that it was competed openly suggests an effort to secure the best value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it is intended to drive down prices through market forces and ensure that the government receives services at a competitive rate.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely the Department of Defense and the Department of the Army, receiving the constructed facility. The services delivered include commercial and institutional building construction, implying the creation or renovation of physical infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to the site where the construction took place, likely a military installation. Workforce implications would include employment opportunities for construction workers, engineers, and project managers involved in the project.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes it difficult to assess if the $18.9M was an optimal price.
The 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' designation raises questions about contractor vetting and oversight for foreign entities.
Limited information on performance metrics or quality of the completed construction.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor.
Project duration of over 4 years indicates a significant and potentially complex undertaking.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly for government projects, is characterized by large contract values and stringent requirements. This contract falls under commercial and institutional building construction, a broad category encompassing various types of non-residential structures. Government spending in this area is often driven by infrastructure needs, modernization efforts, and operational requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale construction projects awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies for similar types of facilities.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract included a small business set-aside. The contract was awarded to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES,' suggesting it was not specifically targeted towards U.S. small businesses. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may have existed, but this information is not provided. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless significant subcontracting occurred.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver the specified construction within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed project performance and cost justifications may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Construction Contracts
Department of the Army Infrastructure Projects
Federal Building and Infrastructure Procurement
Foreign Military Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Foreign Contractor Award
Lack of Specific Contractor Identification
Limited Performance Data

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. SITE ADAPT CONSTRUCTION KHOGAYANI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-06-30. End: 2013-01-21.

What specific type of commercial or institutional building was constructed under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 236220, which covers Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. However, the specific type of building (e.g., barracks, administrative facility, training center, hospital wing) is not detailed in the summary data. Further investigation into the contract's statement of work or project descriptions would be necessary to identify the exact nature of the facility constructed. This information is crucial for understanding the project's purpose and its alignment with the Department of the Army's operational needs.

How did the final cost compare to the initial estimated cost, if available?

The provided data does not include information on the initial estimated cost of the contract, nor does it detail the final cost if it deviated from the awarded amount. As this was a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract, the awarded amount of $18,944,056.50 represents the ceiling price. In an FFP structure, the contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns. Without comparative data on estimated costs or any change orders, it's impossible to assess if the final expenditure was efficient relative to initial projections or market expectations at the time of bidding.

What was the geographic location of the construction project?

The contract identifier 'SITE ADAPT CONSTRUCTION KHOGAYANI' suggests the construction likely took place in or near Khogayani, Afghanistan, given the context of U.S. military operations in that region during the contract period (2008-2013). The term 'SITE ADAPT' implies that the construction involved adapting a specific site for military or institutional purposes. Confirming the precise geographic location would require accessing the full contract details or related project documentation, which are not included in the summary data.

What is the track record of 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' with the Department of Defense?

The designation 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' is a broad category and does not refer to a single specific entity. It implies that the award was made to one or more foreign entities that do not fit into more specific contractor classifications. Assessing the track record of such a diverse group is challenging. Typically, federal agencies maintain databases of contractor performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS). Without knowing the specific foreign entity or entities that received this award, a detailed track record analysis is not feasible. However, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition suggests some level of vetting occurred.

Were there any performance issues or disputes during the contract's execution?

The summary data provided does not contain information regarding performance issues, disputes, or contract modifications during the execution of the SITE ADAPT CONSTRUCTION KHOGAYANI contract. Typically, such details would be found in contract performance reports (like CPARS), modification logs, or litigation records. The contract duration of 1666 days (approximately 4.5 years) and its completion date suggest a substantial project lifecycle. The absence of readily available negative performance indicators in summary data does not guarantee flawless execution, but it also doesn't provide evidence of significant problems.

How does the $18.9M contract value compare to similar construction projects awarded by the DoD during that period?

Comparing the $18.9 million contract value requires identifying similar projects based on scope (e.g., building type, size), location, and time frame. During 2008-2013, the Department of Defense undertook numerous construction projects, particularly in support of operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. Projects of similar scale for base infrastructure, administrative facilities, or logistical hubs could range from several million to tens of millions of dollars. Without specific project details for 'SITE ADAPT CONSTRUCTION KHOGAYANI,' a precise benchmark is difficult. However, $18.9 million is a substantial sum, indicative of a significant construction undertaking, likely within the typical range for major facility development by the DoD in a contingency environment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W917PM08R0064

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,196,579

Exercised Options: $19,196,579

Current Obligation: $18,944,057

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline