DoD's $39M Site Development Contract Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $39,227,378 ($39.2M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-02-11
End Date: 2010-01-05
Contract Duration: 694 days
Daily Burn Rate: $56.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 15
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: SITE DEVELOPMENT / IMPROVEMENTS FARAH
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $39.2 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: SITE DEVELOPMENT / IMPROVEMENTS FARAH Key points: 1. The contract awarded to miscellaneous foreign awardees for site development and improvements represents a significant investment. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust process for selecting the contractor. 3. The contract duration of 694 days indicates a substantial project scope. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the Department of Defense.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $39.2M for site development is substantial. Without specific benchmarks for similar projects in the region or scope, assessing its pricing relative to market rates is challenging. The fixed-price nature provides some cost certainty.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery, as it allows multiple bidders to submit proposals. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing compared to sole-source or limited competitions.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely received a fair price, though the overall value for money depends on project execution and final outcomes.
Public Impact
Infrastructure development funded by the Department of Defense. Potential impact on local economies where site development occurs. Contract awarded to foreign entities, raising questions about domestic economic benefit.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 56 / 10
Warning Flags
- Foreign awardees may limit domestic economic benefits.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Fixed-price contract type offers cost control.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a sector vital for infrastructure development. The $39.2M award is a significant sum, and benchmarks for similar large-scale construction projects would be needed for precise comparison.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the award went to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' and does not specify small business participation. It is unlikely that small businesses were primary awardees in this scenario.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of full and open competition suggests a structured procurement process. However, ongoing oversight would be crucial to ensure project completion, quality, and adherence to contract terms, especially given the foreign awardees.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed project scope.
- Foreign awardees may limit domestic economic impact.
- No clear performance metrics provided.
- Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $39.2 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. SITE DEVELOPMENT / IMPROVEMENTS FARAH
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $39.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-02-11. End: 2010-01-05.
What specific site development or improvements were undertaken, and how do they align with the Department of Defense's strategic needs?
The provided data lacks specifics on the nature of the 'SITE DEVELOPMENT / IMPROVEMENTS'. Understanding the exact scope, such as new construction, renovation, or utility upgrades, is crucial. Aligning these improvements with DoD's operational requirements and long-term strategic goals would determine the true value and necessity of this expenditure.
What were the key factors considered during the full and open competition that led to this specific award, and were there any performance concerns raised?
The data does not detail the evaluation criteria used in the full and open competition. Typically, factors include technical approach, past performance, price, and socioeconomic considerations. Without this information, it's impossible to assess if the award was based on the best value proposition or if any potential risks associated with the awardee were identified and mitigated.
How does the $39.2 million expenditure compare to industry benchmarks for similar site development projects, and what is the projected return on investment for the DoD?
A direct comparison to industry benchmarks is difficult without detailed project specifications (e.g., square footage, type of improvements, location). The $39.2 million represents a significant investment. Assessing the return on investment would require evaluating the long-term utility, operational efficiency gains, or enhanced security the site improvements provide to the Department of Defense.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W917PM08R0017
Offers Received: 15
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $41,961,378
Exercised Options: $39,227,378
Current Obligation: $39,227,378
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-02-11
Current End Date: 2010-01-05
Potential End Date: 2010-01-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-06-06
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)