DoD's $18.3M Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees contract for building equipment shows a high number of awards over 987 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,339,778 ($18.3M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-03-19

End Date: 2009-11-30

Contract Duration: 987 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ANA GARDEZ

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.3 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: ANA GARDEZ Key points: 1. The contract's value, while substantial, needs to be assessed against the specific equipment and services procured. 2. Competition dynamics appear strong with 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' indicated, suggesting a potentially competitive pricing environment. 3. The duration of the contract (987 days) implies a long-term need for these building equipment services. 4. Performance context is limited without specific details on the equipment or services rendered. 5. Sector positioning is within the broader 'Defense' category, specifically supporting the Department of the Army. 6. The contract type is 'DEFINITIVE CONTRACT', which can be used for various purposes, including long-term requirements. 7. The awardee is listed as 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES', indicating a broad category rather than a single entity.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $18.3 million contract is challenging without knowing the specific types and quantities of building equipment procured. The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', which generally supports fair pricing. However, the broad categorization of the awardee as 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' makes direct comparison to specific contractor performance difficult. Further analysis would require details on the equipment specifications and market rates for similar items.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data shows 7 bids were received, suggesting a moderate level of competition for this procurement. While a good number of bids, it's important to understand if this represented the full spectrum of capable suppliers for the specific equipment needed.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and value for money.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army is the primary beneficiary, receiving necessary building equipment. Services delivered likely include the supply and potentially installation or maintenance of various building equipment. Geographic impact is likely concentrated on military installations or facilities managed by the Department of the Army. Workforce implications could involve support staff for installation, maintenance, or logistics related to the equipment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' hinders performance assessment.
The broad nature of 'Other Building Equipment Contractors' makes it difficult to ascertain specialized capabilities.
Contract duration of 987 days without clear performance metrics raises questions about ongoing value.
The absence of specific product or service descriptions limits the ability to benchmark pricing effectively.

Positive Signals

Awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', suggesting a broad search for qualified vendors.
Receipt of 7 bids indicates a degree of market interest and potential for competitive pricing.
The contract's existence points to a recognized need for building equipment within the Department of the Army.
The 'DEFINITIVE CONTRACT' type, while broad, can be used to establish long-term relationships for essential supplies.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader 'Defense' sector, specifically supporting the Department of the Army's infrastructure needs. The procurement of building equipment is a common requirement across many government agencies and private industries. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific type of equipment (e.g., HVAC systems, generators, construction materials) and the scale of the facilities being supported.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (sb: false) was not a specific set-aside for this contract. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were indirectly involved or if opportunities were missed.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically involve the Department of Defense's contracting officers and potentially the Inspector General's office. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the 'DEFINITIVE CONTRACT', including delivery schedules and equipment specifications. Transparency is facilitated by the public availability of contract data, but detailed performance reports are often not publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Procurement
Army Infrastructure Support
Building Equipment Procurement
Foreign Military Sales Support (potential, given awardee type)
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules (potential alternative procurement)

Risk Flags

Lack of Specificity in Awardee Identification
Broad NAICS Code Limits Detailed Analysis
Absence of Specific Deliverables and Performance Metrics
Limited Benchmarking Data Due to Foreign Awardee Category

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.3 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. ANA GARDEZ

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-03-19. End: 2009-11-30.

What specific types of building equipment were procured under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact types of building equipment procured under contract number 238290. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 'Other Building Equipment Contractors' is very broad and could encompass a wide range of items, from HVAC systems and generators to specialized construction tools or components. To understand the value and impact, a detailed breakdown of the equipment specifications, quantities, and their intended use within Army facilities would be necessary. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if the $18.3 million expenditure was aligned with market prices for the specific items acquired.

Who are the 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES', and what is their track record?

The designation 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' is a broad categorization used in federal procurement data and does not identify specific companies. It suggests that the contract was awarded to one or more foreign entities, possibly through a mechanism that aggregates multiple vendors or where specific vendor identification was deemed less critical for public reporting. Consequently, assessing the individual track record, past performance, or reliability of these 'awardees' is not possible with the given data. This lack of specificity raises questions about due diligence and the ability to hold specific entities accountable for performance.

How does the $18.3 million spending compare to similar building equipment contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?

Comparing the $18.3 million spending requires identifying contracts with similar scope, equipment types, and quantities. Given the broad nature of 'Other Building Equipment Contractors' and the 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' designation, direct comparisons are difficult. However, for context, major building equipment procurements can range from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars, depending on the scale and complexity. A more precise benchmark would involve analyzing other Army contracts for specific items like generators, HVAC units, or construction materials over similar timeframes. The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' and 7 bids suggest a potentially competitive price, but without itemized details, a definitive value assessment is limited.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?

The provided contract data does not explicitly list the key performance indicators (KPIs) or specific deliverables for this contract. As a 'DEFINITIVE CONTRACT' awarded to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' for 'Other Building Equipment Contractors', the expectations would likely revolve around the timely delivery of specified equipment, adherence to quality standards, and potentially installation or maintenance services as outlined in the contract's statement of work. The duration of 987 days suggests ongoing requirements, possibly involving phased deliveries or service agreements. Without access to the full contract document or performance reports, the precise KPIs and deliverables remain unknown.

What is the historical spending pattern for 'Other Building Equipment Contractors' by the Department of the Army?

Historical spending patterns for 'Other Building Equipment Contractors' by the Department of the Army can be analyzed by querying federal procurement databases for contracts under the relevant NAICS codes (like 333319, 333999, etc., depending on specifics) and the awarding agency. This particular contract represents a single award of $18.3 million over approximately 2.7 years. To establish a pattern, one would need to aggregate spending across multiple fiscal years and identify trends in contract values, award types, and primary awardee categories. Such analysis could reveal whether spending in this category is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and whether there's a shift towards or away from foreign awardees or specific types of equipment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Building Equipment Contractors › Other Building Equipment Contractors

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W917PM07R0042

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,339,778

Exercised Options: $18,339,778

Current Obligation: $18,339,778

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline