DoD's $51.7M DBE Border Road Segment 1 Contract Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $51,772,500 ($51.8M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-12-16
End Date: 2011-08-29
Contract Duration: 621 days
Daily Burn Rate: $83.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: DBE BORDER ROAD, SEGMENT 1
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $51.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: DBE BORDER ROAD, SEGMENT 1 Key points: 1. The contract value is $51.7 million for highway, street, and bridge construction. 2. Competition was limited, with the award going to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'. 3. The contract was awarded on a firm fixed-price basis. 4. The project duration was 621 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $51.7 million for a border road segment is substantial. Without comparable contract data or a clear breakdown of costs, assessing its pricing against similar projects is difficult. The 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' designation raises questions about the typical competitive landscape for such infrastructure projects.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, indicating a limited procurement approach. This lack of open competition may have impacted price discovery, potentially leading to a less competitive price than if multiple bidders had been involved.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of limited competition for a significant infrastructure project raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best possible value. Further justification for the limited competition is needed to ensure fiscal responsibility.
Public Impact
Taxpayer funds are being used for border infrastructure development. The award to foreign entities for a domestic infrastructure project may raise national security or economic concerns. The lack of transparency in the award process could lead to public distrust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Award to foreign entities
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract can provide cost certainty
- Project completed within the specified duration
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction sector. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on government infrastructure initiatives and national security needs. The benchmark for such projects depends heavily on location, scope, and materials.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific involvement or benefit for small businesses in this contract award. The nature of the award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' suggests that small businesses were likely not primary participants.
Oversight & Accountability
The limited competition and award to foreign entities warrant further oversight to ensure the contract was managed effectively and taxpayer funds were used appropriately. Accountability for the procurement decision is crucial.
Related Government Programs
- Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition raises concerns about value for money.
- Award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' lacks transparency and potential security implications.
- No clear justification for sole-source or limited competition.
- Potential for higher costs due to lack of competitive bidding.
- Lack of small business participation.
Tags
highway-street-and-bridge-construction, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $51.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. DBE BORDER ROAD, SEGMENT 1
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $51.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-12-16. End: 2011-08-29.
What specific criteria were used to justify the limited competition for this border road project, and were alternative procurement methods considered?
The justification for limited competition is not provided in the data. Typically, agencies must demonstrate specific circumstances, such as urgent and compelling needs or the unavailability of qualified sources, to restrict competition. Without this information, it's impossible to assess if the procurement process adhered to best practices for maximizing value and ensuring fairness.
What are the potential risks associated with awarding a border infrastructure project to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' in terms of security, quality, and long-term maintenance?
Awarding border infrastructure to foreign entities can introduce risks related to national security, data privacy, and adherence to U.S. construction standards and quality control. There may also be challenges in ensuring long-term maintenance and accountability. The 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' designation lacks specificity, making it difficult to assess the vetting process and potential vulnerabilities.
How does the $51.7 million cost compare to similar border infrastructure projects, and what factors contributed to this specific price point?
A direct comparison of the $51.7 million cost is challenging without more specific project details and market data for comparable border infrastructure projects. Factors influencing the price could include the terrain, materials required, security considerations, labor costs (potentially foreign), and the firm fixed-price nature of the contract, which may include contingency for unforeseen issues.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W917BK10R0011
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $51,772,500
Exercised Options: $51,772,500
Current Obligation: $51,772,500
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-12-16
Current End Date: 2011-08-29
Potential End Date: 2012-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-09-20
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)