DoD's $10.7M Medium Security Building Contract Awarded to Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,690,054 ($10.7M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-06-26

End Date: 2010-03-30

Contract Duration: 642 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: MAXIMUM/MEDIUM SECURITY BUILDING (06)

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.7 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: MAXIMUM/MEDIUM SECURITY BUILDING (06) Key points: 1. The contract awarded by the Department of the Army for building construction represents a significant investment. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' raises questions about the specific entities involved and their qualifications. 4. The construction sector is vital for infrastructure development, with this contract contributing to that.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10.7 million for a medium-security building is within a typical range for such projects. However, without specific details on the building's size, features, and location, a precise pricing assessment against similar contracts is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing. The use of 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' as the contractor type, however, might indicate a less direct or more complex procurement path, potentially impacting price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for infrastructure development. The competitive nature of the award is intended to ensure reasonable pricing, but the specifics of the foreign awardees warrant scrutiny to confirm value for money.

Public Impact

Construction of secure facilities is essential for government operations and national security. The use of foreign awardees may have implications for local job creation and economic impact. Transparency in the award to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' is crucial for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specificity regarding 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'
Potential for less direct oversight with foreign contractors
Long duration (642 days) for a single building project

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition
Clear contract type (Firm Fixed Price) for cost certainty

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector is driven by infrastructure needs, government facility upgrades, and economic development initiatives. Benchmarks vary widely based on project scope and location.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this contract. The award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' suggests that small business participation may have been limited or not a primary consideration.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of construction projects, especially those involving foreign entities, requires diligent monitoring to ensure quality, adherence to specifications, and timely completion. The Department of the Army is responsible for this oversight.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Ambiguity of 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'
Potential for increased logistical complexity and cost
Limited insight into specific security vetting processes for foreign entities
Long project duration could indicate potential for delays or scope creep

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.7 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. MAXIMUM/MEDIUM SECURITY BUILDING (06)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-06-26. End: 2010-03-30.

What specific criteria were used to vet and select the 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' to ensure they met security and performance standards for a medium-security building?

The vetting process for 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' is critical. Standard procedures likely involve checks against watchlists, verification of financial stability, past performance reviews, and confirmation of compliance with relevant international and U.S. security regulations. The Department of Defense would have specific protocols to ensure these entities are capable and trustworthy for sensitive construction projects.

How does the cost of this $10.7 million project compare to similar medium-security building constructions, considering the potential complexities of engaging foreign contractors?

Comparing the cost requires detailed project specifications (size, materials, security features, location). While full and open competition aims for competitive pricing, engaging foreign awardees can introduce indirect costs (e.g., logistics, currency exchange, compliance) that might influence the final price. A benchmark analysis would need to account for these factors to determine if the $10.7 million represents good value.

What mechanisms are in place to ensure accountability and effective project management given the award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' for a duration of 642 days?

Accountability is typically managed through rigorous contract administration, regular progress reporting, site inspections, and performance metrics. For foreign awardees, this might involve designated points of contact, clear communication channels, and potentially third-party oversight. The firm fixed price contract provides a baseline, but ensuring quality and adherence to schedule over 642 days requires proactive management by the contracting officer's representative.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W917BK07R0089

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,714,054

Exercised Options: $10,714,054

Current Obligation: $10,690,054

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline