DoD Awards $10.9M Construction Contract for Miscellaneous Foreign Buildings in Iraq

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,976,177 ($11.0M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-06-09

End Date: 2008-07-20

Contract Duration: 772 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 45

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200608!601444!2100!W917BK!GULF REGIONAL DIV - SOUTHERN !W917BK06C0037 !A!N! !N! ! !20060609!20070930!123456787!123456787!123456787!N!MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN CONTRACT!2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911 !ARLINGTON !VA!22202!00000! !IZ! ! !IRAQ !+000010000001!N!N!000010000001!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!045!B! !Z!N!Z!B!IZ!N!L!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.0 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: 200608!601444!2100!W917BK!GULF REGIONAL DIV - SOUTHERN !W917BK06C0037 !A!N! !N! ! !20060609!20070930!123456787!123456787!123456787!N!MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN CONTRACT!2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911 !ARLINGTON !VA!22202!00000! !IZ! ! … Key points: 1. Contract awarded for miscellaneous foreign building construction in Iraq. 2. Full and open competition was utilized. 3. The contract type is Fixed Price. 4. The awardee is 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES'. 5. The contract duration is 772 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $10.9 million for miscellaneous foreign buildings is difficult to assess without specific project details. Benchmarking against similar construction projects in conflict zones is challenging due to unique risk factors and logistical complexities.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Full and open competition was used, suggesting an attempt to achieve fair pricing. However, the award to a generic entity 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' raises questions about the actual competition and price discovery process.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of taxpayer funds for construction in a foreign, potentially unstable region requires careful oversight to ensure value for money and prevent waste.

Public Impact

Supports U.S. foreign policy objectives by facilitating infrastructure development in Iraq. Potential for job creation, both locally and for U.S. contractors. Risk of cost overruns due to the volatile operating environment. Transparency concerns given the generic awardee name.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Generic awardee name lacks specificity.
Operating in a high-risk environment (Iraq).
Fixed Price contract may not account for unforeseen costs.
Limited information on specific deliverables.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition utilized.
Contract awarded for essential infrastructure.
Clear start and end dates.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. Spending in this area can vary significantly based on geopolitical factors and infrastructure needs, especially in post-conflict regions.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. The awardee is listed as 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES', which does not suggest a small business entity.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial for contracts in foreign, high-risk environments. The generic nature of the awardee necessitates enhanced scrutiny to ensure accountability and proper use of funds.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of specific awardee information.
Potential for cost overruns in a high-risk environment.
Ambiguity in project scope ('Miscellaneous Buildings').
Limited transparency on price justification.
Contract duration is lengthy (772 days).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.0 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. 200608!601444!2100!W917BK!GULF REGIONAL DIV - SOUTHERN !W917BK06C0037 !A!N! !N! ! !20060609!20070930!123456787!123456787!123456787!N!MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN CONTRACT!2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911 !ARLINGTON !VA!22202!00000! !IZ! ! !IRAQ !+000010000001!N!N!000010000001!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-06-09. End: 2008-07-20.

What specific types of 'Miscellaneous Foreign Buildings' were constructed, and how did their scope align with the $10.9 million budget?

The contract details do not specify the exact nature of the 'Miscellaneous Foreign Buildings.' Further investigation would be needed to determine if the scope included essential facilities, administrative buildings, or other structures, and how the $10.9 million was allocated across these potential categories to ensure it represented a fair value.

What measures were in place to mitigate risks associated with construction in Iraq, and how did they impact the final cost?

Given the inherent risks of operating in Iraq, such as security threats and logistical challenges, it is important to understand what risk mitigation strategies were employed. These could include security protocols, insurance, and contingency planning. The effectiveness of these measures would directly influence the contract's final cost and the overall value delivered.

How was the effectiveness of the completed construction projects evaluated to ensure they met the intended purpose and quality standards?

Evaluating the effectiveness of construction projects in a foreign theater is critical. This involves assessing whether the buildings serve their intended purpose, meet quality standards, and were completed within a reasonable timeframe. Without clear metrics and post-completion assessments, it's difficult to ascertain the true value and impact of this $10.9 million investment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 45

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline