Army Awards $13.5M Contract for Non-Building Facilities Construction to Circle, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,545,595 ($13.5M)

Contractor: Circle, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-10-22

End Date: 2013-12-31

Contract Duration: 3,723 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200408!000061!2100!W912P8!* !W912P804C0004 !A!N! !N! ! !20031022!20051028!034199810!034199810!034199810!N!CIRCLE INC !1204 ENGINEERS RD !BELLE CHASSE !LA!70037!99051!051!22!JEFFERSON !JEFFERSON !LOUISIANA !+000000010000!N!N!000000000000!Y299!ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!011!A! !D!N!C! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !D! !A!A!00 !A!B!Y!S!N! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: HARVEY, JEFFERSON County, LOUISIANA, 70058

State: Louisiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.5 million to CIRCLE, LLC for work described as: 200408!000061!2100!W912P8!* !W912P804C0004 !A!N! !N! ! !20031022!20051028!034199810!034199810!034199810!N!CIRCLE INC !1204 ENGINEERS RD !BELLE CHASSE !LA!70037!99051!051!22!JEFFERSON !JEFF… Key points: 1. The contract value is $13.5 million, awarded by the Department of the Army. 2. Circle, LLC secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is over 10 years, indicating a long-term need. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 237990 suggests a focus on heavy civil engineering construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $13.5 million over 10 years appears reasonable for heavy civil engineering construction services. Benchmarking against similar contracts would provide a more definitive assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The fixed-price nature of the contract further aids in price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is expected to yield a fair price, minimizing unnecessary taxpayer expenditure.

Public Impact

This contract supports infrastructure development and maintenance within the Department of Defense. The long contract duration suggests ongoing projects and a sustained need for these construction services. The award to Circle, LLC contributes to economic activity within Louisiana.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Long contract duration (over 10 years) could lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
  • Lack of specific details on the scope of 'ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES' makes it difficult to fully assess value.
  • No indication of small business participation.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
  • Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs.
  • Awardee is located in Louisiana, potentially benefiting the local economy.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly heavy civil engineering (NAICS 237990), involves significant infrastructure projects. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on government priorities and economic conditions. This contract falls within the broader construction services spending category.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business set-asides were considered or if opportunities were missed.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Standard government oversight mechanisms for contract performance and financial management would apply.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration may increase risk of cost escalation or scope creep.
  • Vague description of services ('ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES') hinders full value assessment.
  • No small business participation noted.
  • Potential for performance issues over an extended period.

Tags

other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, la, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.5 million to CIRCLE, LLC. 200408!000061!2100!W912P8!* !W912P804C0004 !A!N! !N! ! !20031022!20051028!034199810!034199810!034199810!N!CIRCLE INC !1204 ENGINEERS RD !BELLE CHASSE !LA!70037!99051!051!22!JEFFERSON !JEFFERSON !LOUISIANA !+000000010000!N!N!000000000000!Y299!ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CIRCLE, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-10-22. End: 2013-12-31.

What specific types of 'non-building facilities' are covered under this contract, and how does their scope align with the awarded price?

The contract description 'ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES' is broad. A detailed breakdown of the specific facilities (e.g., roads, utilities, levees, airfields) and their required maintenance or construction would be necessary to accurately assess if the $13.5 million price is justified and competitive for the actual work involved.

Given the 10+ year duration, what mechanisms are in place to manage potential cost increases or scope creep over the contract's life?

While the contract is Firm Fixed Price, long-term contracts often include provisions for economic price adjustments or change order processes. Understanding these specific clauses and the frequency/triggers for reviews is crucial for assessing long-term cost control and mitigating risks associated with scope creep.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value was obtained, considering the long-term nature of the services required?

Full and open competition is a strong indicator of potential value. However, for long-term, specialized construction needs, the evaluation criteria used during the competition are critical. Assessing whether the award prioritized not just price but also technical capability, past performance, and long-term cost-effectiveness would provide insight into the effectiveness of the competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1204 ENGINEERS RD, BELLE CHASSE, LA, 70037

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-10-22

Current End Date: 2013-12-31

Potential End Date: 2013-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-25

More Contracts from Circle, LLC

View all Circle, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending