DoD Awards $25.7M Hangar Renovation Contract to CPJ Joint Venture, Including Floor Coating and Blinds
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,724,593 ($25.7M)
Contractor: CPJ Joint Venture
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-09-20
End Date: 2022-09-21
Contract Duration: 1,827 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF REPAIR HANGAR INTERIORS B301-B302. PROJECT INCLUDES COMPLETE INTERIOR RENOVATION TO INCLUDE FIRE SYSTEMS REPLACEMENT AND ASBESTOS REMOVAL, AS WELL AS COMPLETE COMMUNICATIONS REPLACEMENT. EXERCISE OPTION 1 - URETHANE COATING FOR HANGAR FLOORS. EXERCISE OPTION 2 - PROVIDE&INSTALL WINDOW BLINDS&DISPLAY BOARDS.
Place of Performance
Location: CORAOPOLIS, ALLEGHENY County, PENNSYLVANIA, 15108
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $25.7 million to CPJ JOINT VENTURE for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF REPAIR HANGAR INTERIORS B301-B302. PROJECT INCLUDES COMPLETE INTERIOR RENOVATION TO INCLUDE FIRE SYSTEMS REPLACEMENT AND ASBESTOS REMOVAL, AS WELL AS COMPLETE COMMUNICATIONS REPLACEMENT. EXERCISE OPTION 1 - URETHANE COATING FOR HANGAR FLOORS. EXERCISE OPTION 2 - … Key points: 1. The contract covers comprehensive interior renovation of hangar bays, including critical fire systems and asbestos removal. 2. Option 1 adds urethane coating for hangar floors, while Option 2 includes window blinds and display boards. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. 4. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, with a significant value.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $25.7 million for a multi-year renovation project appears reasonable given the scope, which includes structural elements like fire systems and asbestos removal. Benchmarking against similar large-scale hangar renovations would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' suggesting that while competition was sought, specific sources may have been initially excluded before a broader competition was opened. This method aims for competitive pricing but can be complex.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential infrastructure upgrades to military facilities, ensuring operational readiness and safety. The competitive award process aims to secure the best value for the investment.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness and safety of critical military aviation infrastructure. Supports the construction sector through a significant contract award. Addresses environmental concerns through asbestos removal. Modernizes communication systems within the hangar facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to the complexity of asbestos removal and system replacements.
- Long contract duration (1827 days) could lead to scope creep or changing requirements.
- Lack of specific detail on the 'exclusion of sources' process raises minor transparency concerns.
Positive Signals
- Comprehensive scope addresses multiple critical infrastructure needs.
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the base scope.
- Inclusion of options allows for phased upgrades and flexibility.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector for government projects is substantial, covering a wide range of facilities maintenance, repair, and new construction, with values often in the millions for complex projects like hangar renovations.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that neither the prime contractor (CPJ JOINT VENTURE) nor the award itself specifically mention small business participation. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract management personnel within the Army to ensure adherence to terms, quality, and budget. The 'PA' status might indicate a specific type of contract or reporting requirement.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Complexity of asbestos abatement and fire system replacement.
- Long contract duration potentially leading to requirement changes.
- Potential for cost overruns on options if not carefully managed.
- Lack of explicit small business subcontracting information.
- Ambiguity in the 'exclusion of sources' competition method.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, pa, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $25.7 million to CPJ JOINT VENTURE. IGF::OT::IGF REPAIR HANGAR INTERIORS B301-B302. PROJECT INCLUDES COMPLETE INTERIOR RENOVATION TO INCLUDE FIRE SYSTEMS REPLACEMENT AND ASBESTOS REMOVAL, AS WELL AS COMPLETE COMMUNICATIONS REPLACEMENT. EXERCISE OPTION 1 - URETHANE COATING FOR HANGAR FLOORS. EXERCISE OPTION 2 - PROVIDE&INSTALL WINDOW BLINDS&DISPLAY BOARDS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CPJ JOINT VENTURE.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-09-20. End: 2022-09-21.
What is the specific justification for 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' and how did it impact the final price?
The justification for excluding sources prior to full and open competition is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, such exclusions are based on specific technical requirements, past performance, or unique capabilities. Understanding this rationale is crucial to assess if it limited competition and potentially impacted price discovery, although the 'full and open' aspect suggests a broad competitive field was ultimately engaged.
What are the potential risks associated with the asbestos removal and fire system replacement, and how are they being mitigated?
Asbestos removal carries significant health and environmental risks, requiring specialized handling and disposal. Fire system replacement involves complex integration with existing infrastructure. Mitigation strategies likely include strict adherence to environmental regulations, employing certified asbestos abatement contractors, rigorous testing protocols, and detailed planning for system integration to minimize disruption and ensure safety.
How does the urethane coating for hangar floors contribute to the overall value and operational effectiveness of the facility?
Urethane coatings provide a durable, chemical-resistant, and easy-to-clean surface for hangar floors, protecting the concrete from wear, spills (like hydraulic fluid or de-icing agents), and impacts. This enhances the longevity of the facility, reduces maintenance costs, improves safety by providing a non-slip surface, and maintains a cleaner, more professional environment essential for aircraft operations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912KC17R0001
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 225 N SHORE DR, PITTSBURGH, PA, 15212
Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $25,730,731
Exercised Options: $25,730,731
Current Obligation: $25,724,593
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 26
Total Subaward Amount: $12,714,036
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-09-20
Current End Date: 2022-09-21
Potential End Date: 2022-09-21 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-22
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)