DoD awards $13.2M construction contract to TTFC-Eagle Joint Venture for Willow Grove facility

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,248,876 ($13.2M)

Contractor: Ttfc-Eagle Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-09-25

End Date: 2011-01-12

Contract Duration: 839 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: WILLOW GROVE RC

Place of Performance

Location: WILLOW GROVE, MONTGOMERY County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19090

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.2 million to TTFC-EAGLE JOINT VENTURE for work described as: WILLOW GROVE RC Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. The duration of 839 days indicates a significant construction project. 4. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a major component of the DoD. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction. 6. The contract was awarded in Pennsylvania, indicating a specific geographic focus.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $13.2 million for a construction project of this duration appears within a reasonable range for commercial and institutional building construction. However, without specific details on the scope of work, the exact nature of the facility, and comparable projects in the Willow Grove area, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar DoD construction projects of comparable size and complexity would provide a clearer picture of whether the price reflects competitive market rates.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 6 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this project. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process like this one helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the personnel who will utilize the Willow Grove facility. The contract delivers construction services for a commercial and institutional building. The geographic impact is localized to Willow Grove, Pennsylvania. The contract supports the construction workforce, including skilled trades and labor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen construction challenges arise, despite the firm-fixed-price structure.
Ensuring timely completion within the 839-day duration is critical to avoid project delays and associated costs.
Quality control and adherence to construction standards must be rigorously monitored to ensure the facility meets DoD requirements.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract structure transfers significant cost risk to the contractor.
Full and open competition with multiple bidders suggests a competitive pricing environment.
Award to a joint venture may indicate specialized capabilities brought together for this project.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. The Department of Defense is a significant client for construction services, undertaking numerous projects to build, renovate, and maintain its vast infrastructure. Spending in this sub-sector is influenced by military readiness needs, base consolidation or expansion, and modernization efforts. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other DoD construction contracts for similar facilities or projects of equivalent dollar value and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications specifically tied to small business set-aside requirements for this particular award. The prime contractor, TTFC-Eagle Joint Venture, would determine its own subcontracting strategy, which may or may not involve small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards, delivery schedules, and payment milestones. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though specific project details and ongoing oversight activities may not always be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Military Construction
General Services Administration (GSA) Public Buildings Service
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen construction issues arise.
Risk of schedule delays impacting facility readiness.
Ensuring adherence to stringent DoD construction standards and quality requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.2 million to TTFC-EAGLE JOINT VENTURE. WILLOW GROVE RC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TTFC-EAGLE JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-09-25. End: 2011-01-12.

What specific type of commercial and institutional building is being constructed at Willow Grove?

The provided data does not specify the exact type of building being constructed at Willow Grove. The NAICS code 236220, 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction,' is broad and encompasses a wide range of structures such as offices, administrative facilities, barracks, training centers, or support buildings. To understand the specific purpose and function of the facility, further details from the contract's statement of work or project descriptions would be necessary. This information is crucial for assessing the project's complexity, potential risks, and its alignment with the Department of the Army's operational needs.

How does the $13.2 million award compare to similar construction projects by the Department of the Army?

Benchmarking the $13.2 million award requires comparing it to similar construction projects undertaken by the Department of the Army in terms of scope, complexity, and location. Without specific details on the facility's size (square footage), type (e.g., administrative, housing, specialized facility), and the duration of construction (839 days), a direct comparison is difficult. However, for a project lasting over two years, $13.2 million suggests a medium-sized construction effort. Larger projects could easily run into tens or hundreds of millions, while smaller renovations might be in the low millions. A detailed analysis would involve querying contract databases for similar projects awarded within the last few years to establish a price-per-square-foot or price-per-day range.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this construction contract?

Key performance indicators for a construction contract like this typically revolve around schedule adherence, cost control, quality of work, and safety. For this specific contract, the primary KPI would be completing the construction within the 839-day duration. Cost control is managed through the Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type, where the contractor is responsible for any cost overruns. Quality of work would be assessed against contract specifications, building codes, and DoD standards, likely involving regular inspections and testing. Safety performance is also critical, with metrics often including incident rates and compliance with safety regulations. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring these KPIs.

What is the track record of TTFC-Eagle Joint Venture in executing similar federal construction contracts?

The provided data does not include specific details on the past performance or track record of the TTFC-Eagle Joint Venture. To assess their capabilities, one would need to research their contract history with the federal government, looking at factors such as on-time delivery, adherence to budget (especially relevant for FFP contracts), quality of work, and any past performance issues or disputes. Information on previous projects, their values, and client feedback (if available through sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) would be essential for a comprehensive evaluation of their reliability and expertise in handling projects of this magnitude.

What are the potential risks associated with a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for a construction project of this duration?

While an FFP contract shifts cost risk to the contractor, potential risks remain for both parties. For the government, the primary risk is that the contractor might cut corners on quality or safety to maintain profitability if unforeseen issues arise, although contract specifications and oversight aim to mitigate this. The contractor bears the risk of cost overruns due to factors like unexpected site conditions, material price increases, labor shortages, or design changes not covered by contract modifications. For a project of 839 days, the longer duration increases the likelihood of encountering such unforeseen circumstances, making accurate initial bidding crucial for the contractor's success and potentially impacting the government if the contractor struggles financially or defaults.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP

Solicitation ID: W912KC08R0003

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 DIAGONAL RD STE 500, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,248,876

Exercised Options: $13,248,876

Current Obligation: $13,248,876

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline