Army awards $10.4M contract for GIWW pipeline dredging in Texas to King Fisher Marine Service

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,407,313 ($10.4M)

Contractor: King Fisher Marine Service, L.P.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-12-28

End Date: 2009-06-28

Contract Duration: 913 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: GIWW, TX, BOGGY BAYOU TO UPPER MATAGORDA BAY AND CHANNEL TO PALACIOS IN BRAZORIA AND MATAGORDA COUNTIES, TX, PIPELINE DREDGING.

Place of Performance

Location: MATAGORDA, MATAGORDA County, TEXAS, 77457

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.4 million to KING FISHER MARINE SERVICE, L.P. for work described as: GIWW, TX, BOGGY BAYOU TO UPPER MATAGORDA BAY AND CHANNEL TO PALACIOS IN BRAZORIA AND MATAGORDA COUNTIES, TX, PIPELINE DREDGING. Key points: 1. The contract was awarded using full and open competition. 2. The project involves pipeline dredging for the GIWW in Brazoria and Matagoria Counties, Texas. 3. King Fisher Marine Service, L.P. is the contractor. 4. The contract duration is 913 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $10.4 million for a 913-day dredging project appears within a reasonable range for heavy civil engineering construction. However, without specific per-unit cost data or detailed project scope, a precise valuation is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process that should lead to a fair price discovery. The use of a definitive contract indicates a clear scope of work.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential waterway maintenance, ensuring navigation and economic activity. The competitive award process aims to maximize value for the investment.

Public Impact

Ensures continued navigation and economic activity along the GIWW. Supports infrastructure maintenance critical for regional commerce. Provides employment opportunities in the construction and maritime sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Contract duration is long (913 days), potentially leading to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
  • Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes it difficult to assess value for money.
  • No mention of small business participation.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition.
  • Addresses critical infrastructure needs for waterway navigation.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' sector. Spending in this sector is crucial for maintaining and upgrading national infrastructure, including waterways, ports, and transportation networks. Benchmarks for dredging projects vary significantly based on location, scope, and environmental considerations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed for small businesses in this large civil engineering contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The definitive contract structure suggests a defined scope, which aids oversight. However, the long duration necessitates robust monitoring by the Department of the Army to ensure timely completion and adherence to budget, especially given the fixed-price nature.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration (913 days).
  • Lack of detailed cost breakdown for analysis.
  • No indication of small business involvement.
  • Potential for unforeseen subsurface conditions.
  • Weather and environmental risks impacting schedule.

Tags

other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, tx, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.4 million to KING FISHER MARINE SERVICE, L.P.. GIWW, TX, BOGGY BAYOU TO UPPER MATAGORDA BAY AND CHANNEL TO PALACIOS IN BRAZORIA AND MATAGORDA COUNTIES, TX, PIPELINE DREDGING.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KING FISHER MARINE SERVICE, L.P..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-12-28. End: 2009-06-28.

What specific dredging metrics (e.g., cubic yards, depth achieved) were used to establish the fixed price, and how do they compare to industry standards for similar projects?

The provided data does not include specific dredging metrics used for pricing. A fixed-price contract for a project of this scale typically relies on estimated quantities and unit prices for various dredging activities. To assess value, these estimates would need to be benchmarked against historical data for similar GIWW projects or other waterway dredging contracts, considering factors like soil type, disposal methods, and environmental compliance costs.

Given the 913-day duration, what are the primary risks associated with potential delays or cost escalations under this fixed-price contract?

The primary risks include unforeseen subsurface conditions (e.g., hard rock, debris), adverse weather impacting work schedules, and potential environmental permit issues. Under a fixed-price contract, the contractor absorbs cost overruns due to these factors, but significant delays could still impact project completion and potentially lead to claims or contract modifications if scope changes are necessitated.

How does the $10.4 million award compare to the estimated cost or budget for this specific segment of the GIWW maintenance?

Without the government's original cost estimate or budget allocation for this specific dredging task, it's challenging to definitively assess if $10.4 million represents good value. The fact that it was awarded under full and open competition suggests the price was deemed acceptable through the bidding process, but a comparison to internal estimates would provide a clearer picture of fiscal prudence.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W912HY07B0001

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Orion Construction, LLC (UEI: 827665688)

Address: 159 HWY 316, PORT LAVACA, TX, 77979

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,940,538

Exercised Options: $10,407,313

Current Obligation: $10,407,313

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-12-28

Current End Date: 2009-06-28

Potential End Date: 2009-06-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-25

More Contracts from King Fisher Marine Service, L.P.

View all King Fisher Marine Service, L.P. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending