DLA awards $11.8M contract for Robins AFB building construction, highlighting firm fixed-price terms

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,821,469 ($11.8M)

Contractor: Roundhouse-Mv JV

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-09-22

End Date: 2026-03-20

Contract Duration: 910 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DLA DISPOSITION ROBINS BLDG. 1602

Place of Performance

Location: WARNER ROBINS, HOUSTON County, GEORGIA, 31098

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.8 million to ROUNDHOUSE-MV JV for work described as: DLA DISPOSITION ROBINS BLDG. 1602 Key points: 1. Contract awarded using full and open competition after exclusion of sources, suggesting a deliberate selection process. 2. The firm fixed-price contract type indicates predictable costs for the government. 3. Delivery order valued at $11.8M for construction services at Robins AFB. 4. Contract duration of 910 days suggests a significant construction project. 5. The award to ROUNDHOUSE-MV JV signifies a competitive selection for this specific requirement. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's firm fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control. Benchmarking this specific construction project against similar DLA or Department of the Army contracts for building construction at military installations would provide a clearer picture of value. The base award amount of $12.99M (which appears to be a typo in the provided data, as the 'a' field is $11.8M) needs further context to assess if it aligns with market rates for similar scope and complexity.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded, possibly due to specific qualifications or prior relationships. The number of bidders is not specified, making it difficult to fully assess the breadth of competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources, even within an open competition framework, warrants scrutiny to ensure it did not unduly limit competitive offers and potentially impact taxpayer value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the Department of the Army, receiving upgraded or new building facilities at Robins AFB. Services delivered include commercial and institutional building construction, crucial for operational readiness and infrastructure maintenance. The geographic impact is localized to Robins Air Force Base in Georgia. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction workers and related trades during the contract period.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
Lack of specific details on the reasons for excluding certain sources.
No explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Awarded to a joint venture, potentially indicating specialized capabilities.
Long-term contract duration suggests a significant and necessary project.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. This sector encompasses the building of non-residential structures such as offices, warehouses, and facilities for government and military use. Spending in this area is often driven by infrastructure upgrades, modernization efforts, and the need for specialized facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other construction contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies for similar types of buildings on military installations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans or goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary contractor, ROUNDHOUSE-MV JV, will likely handle the majority of the work, with potential subcontracting opportunities not specifically mandated for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and engineering divisions, responsible for ensuring construction meets specifications and timelines. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, which penalizes cost overruns by the contractor. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though specific details regarding the 'exclusion of sources' may require further inquiry. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Construction Contracts
Robins Air Force Base Infrastructure Projects
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Awards
Federal Building Construction Services
Firm Fixed-Price Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
Lack of transparency regarding reasons for source exclusion.
No explicit small business subcontracting requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.8 million to ROUNDHOUSE-MV JV. DLA DISPOSITION ROBINS BLDG. 1602

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROUNDHOUSE-MV JV.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-22. End: 2026-03-20.

What specific criteria were used to exclude certain sources in this 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award?

The specific criteria for excluding sources in a 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award are not detailed in the provided data. This contract type typically implies that the agency determined that only certain responsible sources were capable of meeting the agency's needs, or that it was not practicable to conduct a competition among a larger number of sources. Reasons could include highly specialized requirements, urgent needs, or prior performance on related projects. Without further documentation from the awarding agency (Department of the Army), the exact rationale remains undisclosed, making it difficult to assess if the exclusion was fully justified and did not limit competition unnecessarily.

How does the $11.8 million award compare to similar building construction contracts at military installations?

Benchmarking the $11.8 million award requires comparing it to similar construction projects at Department of Defense installations. Factors such as the type of building (e.g., barracks, administrative, maintenance), square footage, complexity of systems (HVAC, electrical, plumbing), and geographic location significantly influence cost. For instance, a basic warehouse construction might cost less per square foot than a specialized research facility. Without access to a database of comparable projects with detailed scope and cost breakdowns, it's challenging to definitively state whether $11.8 million represents a competitive price. However, for a substantial building project at a major installation like Robins AFB, this figure suggests a significant undertaking.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for a project of this duration?

Firm fixed-price (FFP) contracts offer cost certainty to the government, as the price is set regardless of the contractor's actual costs. However, for a project spanning 910 days (approximately 2.5 years), risks can emerge. If the contractor underestimated labor, material, or unforeseen site conditions, they bear the loss, potentially leading to quality compromises or contractor financial distress. Conversely, if the contractor significantly overestimated costs, the government may have overpaid. The long duration increases the likelihood of market fluctuations in material prices, which the contractor must absorb under an FFP agreement. Effective government oversight is crucial to ensure the contractor maintains quality and financial stability throughout the project lifecycle.

What is the track record of ROUNDHOUSE-MV JV in performing federal construction contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of ROUNDHOUSE-MV JV in performing federal construction contracts is not provided in the data. As a joint venture, its performance history might be a composite of its individual member companies or specific to projects undertaken as a JV. To assess their reliability, one would typically look at past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), the number and size of previous federal contracts awarded, and any history of disputes or contract terminations. A thorough review would involve searching federal procurement databases and performance assessment systems for projects previously completed by this entity.

What are the implications of this contract award for small businesses in the construction sector?

Since this contract was not a small business set-aside and there's no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears limited. The primary contractor, ROUNDHOUSE-MV JV, will likely manage the project. While they may engage subcontractors, there's no guarantee these will be small businesses unless specified in their subcontracting plan (which is not detailed here). This means opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific $11.8 million project might be less than if it had been specifically targeted for small business participation or included robust subcontracting requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W912HP18R6000

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 104 PARK DRIVE SUITE K, WARNER ROBINS, GA, 31088

Business Categories: Category Business, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,821,469

Exercised Options: $11,821,469

Current Obligation: $11,821,469

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912HP21D6004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline