DoD's Army spent $17.5M on Architectural Services via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,526,344 ($17.5M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-06-02
End Date: 2020-12-12
Contract Duration: 4,211 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 7.1.2 - 7.1.4 SERVICES
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.5 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: 7.1.2 - 7.1.4 SERVICES Key points: 1. Spending of $17.5M on architectural services over 11 years. 2. Contract awarded to miscellaneous foreign awardees. 3. Risk of limited oversight due to foreign awardees. 4. Sector: Construction/Professional Services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $17.5M for architectural services over 11 years appears reasonable given the duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale architectural projects would provide a clearer picture of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the award to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' raises questions about the effectiveness of price discovery and potential for cost overruns.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for architectural services, with the ultimate impact depending on the efficiency and effectiveness of the services rendered and the competitive pricing achieved.
Public Impact
Significant investment in architectural services for potential infrastructure or facility projects. Award to foreign entities may impact local job creation and economic benefits. Long contract duration suggests ongoing or phased project needs.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Foreign awardees may present oversight challenges.
- Long contract duration could lead to scope creep or cost escalation.
- Lack of specific project details limits assessment of necessity.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition was utilized.
- Firm fixed price contract type can control costs.
Sector Analysis
The construction and architectural services sector is vital for government infrastructure development. Spending benchmarks vary widely based on project complexity, location, and scale. This $17.5M expenditure over 11 years for architectural services falls within a broad range for major federal projects.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees,' indicating no direct benefit or subcontracting opportunities for U.S. small businesses under this specific award. The focus was on global competition.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight of contracts awarded to foreign entities can be more complex, requiring robust communication channels and adherence to international legal frameworks. The long duration necessitates continuous monitoring to ensure compliance and value.
Related Government Programs
- Architectural Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for increased oversight complexity with foreign awardees.
- Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation and scope creep.
- Lack of specific project details hinders performance assessment.
- Ambiguity in 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' could mask non-competitive awards.
Tags
architectural-services, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.5 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. 7.1.2 - 7.1.4 SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-06-02. End: 2020-12-12.
What specific architectural projects were undertaken with this $17.5M funding, and were they completed on time and within budget?
The provided data does not specify the exact projects. The contract's long duration (2009-2020) suggests multiple phases or ongoing needs. Without project-specific details, it's impossible to assess timeliness or budget adherence. Further investigation into task orders and deliverables is required.
What are the risks associated with awarding architectural services to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' in terms of quality control and intellectual property protection?
Awarding to foreign entities can introduce risks related to differing quality standards, communication barriers, and challenges in enforcing intellectual property rights. Robust contract clauses, clear performance metrics, and potentially on-site oversight mechanisms would be crucial to mitigate these risks.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure competitive pricing given the award to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees'?
While 'full and open competition' theoretically maximizes bidder participation, the 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' designation raises questions. It's unclear if this truly represented the most competitive landscape or if specific foreign firms were targeted. Further analysis of the bidding pool and final pricing against benchmarks is needed to confirm cost-effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,733,032
Exercised Options: $21,733,032
Current Obligation: $17,526,344
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-06-02
Current End Date: 2020-12-12
Potential End Date: 2020-12-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2019-08-21
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)