DoD's Army Spent $17.8M on Architectural Services via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,806,273 ($17.8M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-04-23
End Date: 2016-09-30
Contract Duration: 2,717 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 7.1.2 & SECONDARY SERVICES
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: 7.1.2 & SECONDARY SERVICES Key points: 1. Spending on architectural services reached $17.8 million. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 3. The contract spanned nearly 7.5 years, indicating long-term needs. 4. No small business participation was noted.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's duration and fixed-price nature suggest a degree of price predictability. However, without specific benchmarks for architectural services of this scale and complexity, a definitive value assessment is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for a broad range of potential bidders. The use of a definitive contract suggests a well-defined scope of work.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through market forces.
Public Impact
Taxpayers funded significant architectural services for the Department of the Army. The long contract duration implies ongoing infrastructure or project development needs. The absence of small business involvement may indicate a missed opportunity for economic diversification.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation
- Long contract duration could mask potential cost overruns if scope changes
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized
- Fixed-price contract type
Sector Analysis
This spending falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically architectural services. Benchmarks for such contracts vary widely based on project scope, location, and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The contract did not involve small businesses, which could represent a missed opportunity to support smaller firms in the architectural services sector. Further analysis would be needed to understand why small businesses were not primary awardees.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of full and open competition and a fixed-price contract type suggests a structured procurement process. However, oversight of the long-term execution and any potential scope creep would be crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Architectural Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of small business participation
- Long contract duration (nearly 7.5 years)
- Vague description of services ('Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees')
- No specific project details provided
Tags
architectural-services, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. 7.1.2 & SECONDARY SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-04-23. End: 2016-09-30.
What was the average annual spending on architectural services under this contract?
The total contract value was $17,806,272.72 over a duration of 2717 days. This equates to approximately $6,554 per day. Annualizing this, the average annual spending would be roughly $2.37 million. This figure provides a clearer picture of the consistent investment in architectural services over the contract's lifespan.
What specific architectural projects or services were covered by this contract?
The data indicates the contract was for 'Architectural Services' (NAICS 541310) and involved 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees'. Without further details, the exact nature of the projects remains unclear. It could range from design and planning for military facilities abroad to specialized consulting, making it difficult to assess specific risks without more context.
How did the pricing compare to similar architectural service contracts awarded during the same period?
The provided data does not include pricing details or benchmarks for comparable contracts. While the contract was awarded under full and open competition and used a firm fixed-price structure, assessing its cost-effectiveness requires external data on market rates for similar architectural services during the 2009-2016 period.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,814,034
Exercised Options: $22,814,034
Current Obligation: $17,806,273
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-04-23
Current End Date: 2016-09-30
Potential End Date: 2016-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-09-30
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)