DoD's Army Awarded $16.8M for Architectural Services Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,852,807 ($16.9M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-03-19
End Date: 2016-12-30
Contract Duration: 2,843 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 7.1.2 - 7.1.4 SERVICES
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: 7.1.2 - 7.1.4 SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $16.8M for architectural services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating broad market engagement. 3. Contract duration spans nearly 8 years, suggesting long-term needs. 4. No small business participation noted, potentially missing opportunities for smaller firms.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's firm fixed price structure suggests a clear understanding of costs. Benchmarking against similar architectural services contracts would provide further insight into value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition is a positive sign for price discovery, allowing multiple bidders to compete. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award likely resulted in a fair price for taxpayers, though the total value is substantial.
Public Impact
Ensures access to a wide range of architectural expertise for military projects. Supports infrastructure development and modernization within the Department of Defense. Potential for long-term impact on military facility design and functionality.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration could lead to scope creep or changing requirements.
- Lack of small business participation might indicate barriers for smaller firms.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition promotes market efficiency.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically architectural services. Spending in this area is crucial for government infrastructure projects, with benchmarks varying widely based on project complexity and scale.
Small Business Impact
The absence of small business participation is notable. Further analysis could explore if the contract's scope or bidding requirements inadvertently excluded smaller firms, potentially limiting opportunities for economic diversity.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a transparent process. Oversight would focus on contract performance, adherence to scope, and final delivery of architectural services.
Related Government Programs
- Architectural Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration
- No small business participation
- Potential for scope creep
- Vague service description ('MISCELLANEOUS')
Tags
architectural-services, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.9 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. 7.1.2 - 7.1.4 SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-03-19. End: 2016-12-30.
What specific architectural projects were undertaken with this $16.8M contract, and did they align with the Army's strategic infrastructure goals?
The contract was for miscellaneous architectural services, likely supporting various projects across the Department of the Army. Without specific project details, it's difficult to definitively link them to strategic goals. However, such contracts typically support facility design, renovation, and planning, which are essential for maintaining and modernizing military infrastructure.
Given the nearly 8-year duration, what mechanisms were in place to manage potential cost overruns or scope creep, especially with a firm fixed price contract?
Firm fixed price contracts inherently place the risk of cost overruns on the contractor. However, mechanisms like phased delivery, clear statement of work, and regular performance reviews are crucial for managing scope. The contract's duration suggests these services were likely delivered in stages, allowing for adjustments and oversight at key milestones.
How did the full and open competition process ensure the most effective and innovative architectural solutions were selected for the Army's needs?
Full and open competition allows a wide range of qualified firms to submit proposals, fostering a competitive environment that theoretically drives innovation and efficiency. The selection process would have evaluated technical merit, past performance, and price to ensure the chosen firm offered the best value and solutions tailored to the Army's specific architectural requirements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $20,726,782
Exercised Options: $20,726,782
Current Obligation: $16,852,807
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-03-19
Current End Date: 2016-12-30
Potential End Date: 2016-12-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-12-30
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)